Cargando…

Outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: To improve nutritional status and dysphagia, esophageal cancer patients starting neoadjuvant therapy in advance of curative-intent surgery may receive a jejunostomy tube (J-tube) or esophageal stent, or they may be managed without a feeding modality. We examined percent total weight loss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velotta, Jeffrey B., Dusendang, Jennifer R., Kwak, Hyunjee, Huyser, Michelle, Patel, Ashish, Ashiku, Simon K., Herrinton, Lisa J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659814
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3220
_version_ 1784576878081736704
author Velotta, Jeffrey B.
Dusendang, Jennifer R.
Kwak, Hyunjee
Huyser, Michelle
Patel, Ashish
Ashiku, Simon K.
Herrinton, Lisa J.
author_facet Velotta, Jeffrey B.
Dusendang, Jennifer R.
Kwak, Hyunjee
Huyser, Michelle
Patel, Ashish
Ashiku, Simon K.
Herrinton, Lisa J.
author_sort Velotta, Jeffrey B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To improve nutritional status and dysphagia, esophageal cancer patients starting neoadjuvant therapy in advance of curative-intent surgery may receive a jejunostomy tube (J-tube) or esophageal stent, or they may be managed without a feeding modality. We examined percent total weight loss (%TWL), reinterventions, and progression to surgery in relation to these options. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study included stage II–III esophageal cancer patients diagnosed during 2010–2017 who received J-tube, stent, or nutritional counseling only, without a procedure, when starting chemotherapy or combined modality chemoradiation. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record and chart review. We compared median %TWL between intervention groups and reinterventions using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Among the 366 patients, median %TWL reached a nadir at 120 days, when it was 7% for patients with no procedure (N=307), 4% for J-tube (N=39), and 16% for stent (N=20) (P=0.01). Individual case analysis revealed 72–80% of the patients in the three groups started chemotherapy or chemoradiation as neoadjuvant curative-intent therapy (P difference =0.79). In J-tube patients, the reasons for intervention was anticipation of weight loss in 49% and mitigation of actual weight loss in 15%, whereas 95% of stent patients received the stent for dysphagia (P<0.001). A complication of the procedure was recorded in 85% of stent patients and 74% of J-tube patients (P<0.001). Among those who received no procedure initially, 25% received one later, compared with 15% of J-tube patients and 70% of stent patients who received a second procedure (P<0.001). Progression to surgery was observed in 65% of patients with no procedure, 51% of patients with J-tube, and 40% of stent patients, P=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: For stage II–III esophageal cancer patients starting chemotherapy, this study gives evidence that stents were associated with significant %TWL and risk of reintervention. Although J-tube patients returned to baseline weight sooner than those with no procedure, they experienced complications from their J-tubes. For esophageal cancer patients undergoing curative-intent treatment and with acceptable levels of weight loss, no procedure at all may be superior to placing a J-tube in terms of complications, weight loss, and progression to curative-intent surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8482328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84823282021-10-14 Outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study Velotta, Jeffrey B. Dusendang, Jennifer R. Kwak, Hyunjee Huyser, Michelle Patel, Ashish Ashiku, Simon K. Herrinton, Lisa J. J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: To improve nutritional status and dysphagia, esophageal cancer patients starting neoadjuvant therapy in advance of curative-intent surgery may receive a jejunostomy tube (J-tube) or esophageal stent, or they may be managed without a feeding modality. We examined percent total weight loss (%TWL), reinterventions, and progression to surgery in relation to these options. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study included stage II–III esophageal cancer patients diagnosed during 2010–2017 who received J-tube, stent, or nutritional counseling only, without a procedure, when starting chemotherapy or combined modality chemoradiation. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record and chart review. We compared median %TWL between intervention groups and reinterventions using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Among the 366 patients, median %TWL reached a nadir at 120 days, when it was 7% for patients with no procedure (N=307), 4% for J-tube (N=39), and 16% for stent (N=20) (P=0.01). Individual case analysis revealed 72–80% of the patients in the three groups started chemotherapy or chemoradiation as neoadjuvant curative-intent therapy (P difference =0.79). In J-tube patients, the reasons for intervention was anticipation of weight loss in 49% and mitigation of actual weight loss in 15%, whereas 95% of stent patients received the stent for dysphagia (P<0.001). A complication of the procedure was recorded in 85% of stent patients and 74% of J-tube patients (P<0.001). Among those who received no procedure initially, 25% received one later, compared with 15% of J-tube patients and 70% of stent patients who received a second procedure (P<0.001). Progression to surgery was observed in 65% of patients with no procedure, 51% of patients with J-tube, and 40% of stent patients, P=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: For stage II–III esophageal cancer patients starting chemotherapy, this study gives evidence that stents were associated with significant %TWL and risk of reintervention. Although J-tube patients returned to baseline weight sooner than those with no procedure, they experienced complications from their J-tubes. For esophageal cancer patients undergoing curative-intent treatment and with acceptable levels of weight loss, no procedure at all may be superior to placing a J-tube in terms of complications, weight loss, and progression to curative-intent surgery. AME Publishing Company 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8482328/ /pubmed/34659814 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3220 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Velotta, Jeffrey B.
Dusendang, Jennifer R.
Kwak, Hyunjee
Huyser, Michelle
Patel, Ashish
Ashiku, Simon K.
Herrinton, Lisa J.
Outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study
title Outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort outcomes following interventions to sustain body weight in esophageal cancer patients starting preoperative therapy: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659814
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3220
work_keys_str_mv AT velottajeffreyb outcomesfollowinginterventionstosustainbodyweightinesophagealcancerpatientsstartingpreoperativetherapyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dusendangjenniferr outcomesfollowinginterventionstosustainbodyweightinesophagealcancerpatientsstartingpreoperativetherapyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kwakhyunjee outcomesfollowinginterventionstosustainbodyweightinesophagealcancerpatientsstartingpreoperativetherapyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huysermichelle outcomesfollowinginterventionstosustainbodyweightinesophagealcancerpatientsstartingpreoperativetherapyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT patelashish outcomesfollowinginterventionstosustainbodyweightinesophagealcancerpatientsstartingpreoperativetherapyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ashikusimonk outcomesfollowinginterventionstosustainbodyweightinesophagealcancerpatientsstartingpreoperativetherapyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT herrintonlisaj outcomesfollowinginterventionstosustainbodyweightinesophagealcancerpatientsstartingpreoperativetherapyaretrospectivecohortstudy