Cargando…
Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes can negatively impact long term health outcomes, healthcare costs and quality of life. However, intensive lifestyle interventions, including the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), can significantly lower risk of incident type 2 diabetes among overweight adults with predia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11731-7 |
_version_ | 1784576933592301568 |
---|---|
author | Gholami, Maryam Jackson, Nicholas J. Chung, Un Young Rebecca Duru, O. Kenrik Shedd, Kelly Soetenga, Samantha Loeb, Tamara Elashoff, David Hamilton, Alison B. Mangione, Carol M. Slusser, Wendelin Moin, Tannaz |
author_facet | Gholami, Maryam Jackson, Nicholas J. Chung, Un Young Rebecca Duru, O. Kenrik Shedd, Kelly Soetenga, Samantha Loeb, Tamara Elashoff, David Hamilton, Alison B. Mangione, Carol M. Slusser, Wendelin Moin, Tannaz |
author_sort | Gholami, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes can negatively impact long term health outcomes, healthcare costs and quality of life. However, intensive lifestyle interventions, including the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), can significantly lower risk of incident type 2 diabetes among overweight adults with prediabetes. Unfortunately, the majority of adults in the US who are at risk of developing diabetes do not engage in DPP-based lifestyle change programs. Increased adoption of evidence-based obesity and diabetes prevention interventions, such as the DPP, may help large employers reduce health risks and improve health outcomes among employees. In 2018, the University of California Office of thePresident (UCOP) implemented the UC DPP Initiative, a novel, multi-component program to address diabetes and obesity prevention across the UC system. METHODS: The goal of our study is to conduct a multifaceted evaluation of the UC DPP Initiative using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Our evaluation will integrate unique and diverse UC data sources, including electronic health record (EHR) data, administrative claims, campus-based DPP cohort data, qualitative interviews and site visits. Our primary outcome of interest is the mean percent weight change among three groups of overweight/obese UC beneficiaries at risk for diabetes at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include mean percent weight change at 24-month follow-up, barriers and facilitators associated with implementatio, as well as the degree of program adoption and maintenance. DISCUSSION: Our study will help inform diabetes and obesity prevention efforts across the UC system. Findings from this evaluation will also be highly applicable to universities and large employers, as well as community organizers, healthcare organizations and insurers implementing the DPP and/or other health promotion interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8482560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84825602021-09-30 Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative Gholami, Maryam Jackson, Nicholas J. Chung, Un Young Rebecca Duru, O. Kenrik Shedd, Kelly Soetenga, Samantha Loeb, Tamara Elashoff, David Hamilton, Alison B. Mangione, Carol M. Slusser, Wendelin Moin, Tannaz BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes can negatively impact long term health outcomes, healthcare costs and quality of life. However, intensive lifestyle interventions, including the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), can significantly lower risk of incident type 2 diabetes among overweight adults with prediabetes. Unfortunately, the majority of adults in the US who are at risk of developing diabetes do not engage in DPP-based lifestyle change programs. Increased adoption of evidence-based obesity and diabetes prevention interventions, such as the DPP, may help large employers reduce health risks and improve health outcomes among employees. In 2018, the University of California Office of thePresident (UCOP) implemented the UC DPP Initiative, a novel, multi-component program to address diabetes and obesity prevention across the UC system. METHODS: The goal of our study is to conduct a multifaceted evaluation of the UC DPP Initiative using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Our evaluation will integrate unique and diverse UC data sources, including electronic health record (EHR) data, administrative claims, campus-based DPP cohort data, qualitative interviews and site visits. Our primary outcome of interest is the mean percent weight change among three groups of overweight/obese UC beneficiaries at risk for diabetes at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include mean percent weight change at 24-month follow-up, barriers and facilitators associated with implementatio, as well as the degree of program adoption and maintenance. DISCUSSION: Our study will help inform diabetes and obesity prevention efforts across the UC system. Findings from this evaluation will also be highly applicable to universities and large employers, as well as community organizers, healthcare organizations and insurers implementing the DPP and/or other health promotion interventions. BioMed Central 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8482560/ /pubmed/34592981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11731-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Gholami, Maryam Jackson, Nicholas J. Chung, Un Young Rebecca Duru, O. Kenrik Shedd, Kelly Soetenga, Samantha Loeb, Tamara Elashoff, David Hamilton, Alison B. Mangione, Carol M. Slusser, Wendelin Moin, Tannaz Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative |
title | Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative |
title_full | Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative |
title_short | Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative |
title_sort | evaluation of the university of california diabetes prevention program (uc dpp) initiative |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11731-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gholamimaryam evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT jacksonnicholasj evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT chungunyoungrebecca evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT duruokenrik evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT sheddkelly evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT soetengasamantha evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT loebtamara evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT elashoffdavid evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT hamiltonalisonb evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT mangionecarolm evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT slusserwendelin evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative AT mointannaz evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative |