Cargando…

Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes can negatively impact long term health outcomes, healthcare costs and quality of life. However, intensive lifestyle interventions, including the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), can significantly lower risk of incident type 2 diabetes among overweight adults with predia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gholami, Maryam, Jackson, Nicholas J., Chung, Un Young Rebecca, Duru, O. Kenrik, Shedd, Kelly, Soetenga, Samantha, Loeb, Tamara, Elashoff, David, Hamilton, Alison B., Mangione, Carol M., Slusser, Wendelin, Moin, Tannaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11731-7
_version_ 1784576933592301568
author Gholami, Maryam
Jackson, Nicholas J.
Chung, Un Young Rebecca
Duru, O. Kenrik
Shedd, Kelly
Soetenga, Samantha
Loeb, Tamara
Elashoff, David
Hamilton, Alison B.
Mangione, Carol M.
Slusser, Wendelin
Moin, Tannaz
author_facet Gholami, Maryam
Jackson, Nicholas J.
Chung, Un Young Rebecca
Duru, O. Kenrik
Shedd, Kelly
Soetenga, Samantha
Loeb, Tamara
Elashoff, David
Hamilton, Alison B.
Mangione, Carol M.
Slusser, Wendelin
Moin, Tannaz
author_sort Gholami, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes can negatively impact long term health outcomes, healthcare costs and quality of life. However, intensive lifestyle interventions, including the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), can significantly lower risk of incident type 2 diabetes among overweight adults with prediabetes. Unfortunately, the majority of adults in the US who are at risk of developing diabetes do not engage in DPP-based lifestyle change programs. Increased adoption of evidence-based obesity and diabetes prevention interventions, such as the DPP, may help large employers reduce health risks and improve health outcomes among employees. In 2018, the University of California Office of thePresident (UCOP) implemented the UC DPP Initiative, a novel, multi-component program to address diabetes and obesity prevention across the UC system. METHODS: The goal of our study is to conduct a multifaceted evaluation of the UC DPP Initiative using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Our evaluation will integrate unique and diverse UC data sources, including electronic health record (EHR) data, administrative claims, campus-based DPP cohort data, qualitative interviews and site visits. Our primary outcome of interest is the mean percent weight change among three groups of overweight/obese UC beneficiaries at risk for diabetes at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include mean percent weight change at 24-month follow-up, barriers and facilitators associated with implementatio, as well as  the degree of program adoption and maintenance. DISCUSSION: Our study will help inform diabetes and obesity prevention efforts across the UC system. Findings from this evaluation will also be highly applicable to universities and large employers, as well as community organizers, healthcare organizations and insurers implementing the DPP and/or other health promotion interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8482560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84825602021-09-30 Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative Gholami, Maryam Jackson, Nicholas J. Chung, Un Young Rebecca Duru, O. Kenrik Shedd, Kelly Soetenga, Samantha Loeb, Tamara Elashoff, David Hamilton, Alison B. Mangione, Carol M. Slusser, Wendelin Moin, Tannaz BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes can negatively impact long term health outcomes, healthcare costs and quality of life. However, intensive lifestyle interventions, including the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), can significantly lower risk of incident type 2 diabetes among overweight adults with prediabetes. Unfortunately, the majority of adults in the US who are at risk of developing diabetes do not engage in DPP-based lifestyle change programs. Increased adoption of evidence-based obesity and diabetes prevention interventions, such as the DPP, may help large employers reduce health risks and improve health outcomes among employees. In 2018, the University of California Office of thePresident (UCOP) implemented the UC DPP Initiative, a novel, multi-component program to address diabetes and obesity prevention across the UC system. METHODS: The goal of our study is to conduct a multifaceted evaluation of the UC DPP Initiative using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Our evaluation will integrate unique and diverse UC data sources, including electronic health record (EHR) data, administrative claims, campus-based DPP cohort data, qualitative interviews and site visits. Our primary outcome of interest is the mean percent weight change among three groups of overweight/obese UC beneficiaries at risk for diabetes at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include mean percent weight change at 24-month follow-up, barriers and facilitators associated with implementatio, as well as  the degree of program adoption and maintenance. DISCUSSION: Our study will help inform diabetes and obesity prevention efforts across the UC system. Findings from this evaluation will also be highly applicable to universities and large employers, as well as community organizers, healthcare organizations and insurers implementing the DPP and/or other health promotion interventions. BioMed Central 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8482560/ /pubmed/34592981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11731-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gholami, Maryam
Jackson, Nicholas J.
Chung, Un Young Rebecca
Duru, O. Kenrik
Shedd, Kelly
Soetenga, Samantha
Loeb, Tamara
Elashoff, David
Hamilton, Alison B.
Mangione, Carol M.
Slusser, Wendelin
Moin, Tannaz
Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative
title Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative
title_full Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative
title_fullStr Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative
title_short Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative
title_sort evaluation of the university of california diabetes prevention program (uc dpp) initiative
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11731-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gholamimaryam evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT jacksonnicholasj evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT chungunyoungrebecca evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT duruokenrik evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT sheddkelly evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT soetengasamantha evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT loebtamara evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT elashoffdavid evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT hamiltonalisonb evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT mangionecarolm evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT slusserwendelin evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative
AT mointannaz evaluationoftheuniversityofcaliforniadiabetespreventionprogramucdppinitiative