Cargando…
A Descriptive analysis of urine drug screen results in patients with opioid use disorder managed in a primary care setting
BACKGROUND: Urine drug screening (UDS) is commonly used as part of treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), including treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone for OUD in a primary care setting. Very little is known about the value of UDS, the optimum screening frequency in general, or its specific use...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13722-021-00264-4 |
_version_ | 1784576936469594112 |
---|---|
author | Sobel, Halle G. Warrington, Jill S. Francis-Fath, Samuel Crocker, Abigail M. Berger, Claudia A. |
author_facet | Sobel, Halle G. Warrington, Jill S. Francis-Fath, Samuel Crocker, Abigail M. Berger, Claudia A. |
author_sort | Sobel, Halle G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Urine drug screening (UDS) is commonly used as part of treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), including treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone for OUD in a primary care setting. Very little is known about the value of UDS, the optimum screening frequency in general, or its specific use for buprenorphine treatment in primary care. To address this question, we thought that in a stable population receiving buprenorphine-naloxone in the primary care setting it would be useful to know how often UDS yielded expected and unexpected results. METHODS: We present a descriptive analysis of UDS results in patients treated with buprenorphine-naloxone for OUD in a primary care setting over a two-year period. An unexpected test result is: 1. A negative test for buprenorphine and/or. 2. A positive test for opioids, methadone, cocaine and/or heroin. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients received care during the study period and a total of 2588 test results were analyzed from this population. We found that 64.4% of the patient population (n = 104 patients) demonstrated both treatment adherence (as measured by buprenorphine positive test results) and no apparent unexpected test findings, as defined by negative tests for opioids, methadone, cocaine and heroin. Of the 161 patients, 20 results were positive for opioids, 5 for methadone, 39 for heroin and 2 for cocaine. Analysis at the UDS level demonstrated that, of the 2588 test results, 38 (1.5%) results did not have buprenorphine. Of the 2588, 28 (1.1%) test results were positive for opioids, 8 (0.3%) were positive for methadone, 39 (1.5%) for cocaine and 2 (0.1%) for heroin. CONCLUSION: Given that the majority of patients in our study had expected urine results, it may be reasonable for less frequent urine testing in certain patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13722-021-00264-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8482571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84825712021-09-30 A Descriptive analysis of urine drug screen results in patients with opioid use disorder managed in a primary care setting Sobel, Halle G. Warrington, Jill S. Francis-Fath, Samuel Crocker, Abigail M. Berger, Claudia A. Addict Sci Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: Urine drug screening (UDS) is commonly used as part of treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), including treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone for OUD in a primary care setting. Very little is known about the value of UDS, the optimum screening frequency in general, or its specific use for buprenorphine treatment in primary care. To address this question, we thought that in a stable population receiving buprenorphine-naloxone in the primary care setting it would be useful to know how often UDS yielded expected and unexpected results. METHODS: We present a descriptive analysis of UDS results in patients treated with buprenorphine-naloxone for OUD in a primary care setting over a two-year period. An unexpected test result is: 1. A negative test for buprenorphine and/or. 2. A positive test for opioids, methadone, cocaine and/or heroin. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients received care during the study period and a total of 2588 test results were analyzed from this population. We found that 64.4% of the patient population (n = 104 patients) demonstrated both treatment adherence (as measured by buprenorphine positive test results) and no apparent unexpected test findings, as defined by negative tests for opioids, methadone, cocaine and heroin. Of the 161 patients, 20 results were positive for opioids, 5 for methadone, 39 for heroin and 2 for cocaine. Analysis at the UDS level demonstrated that, of the 2588 test results, 38 (1.5%) results did not have buprenorphine. Of the 2588, 28 (1.1%) test results were positive for opioids, 8 (0.3%) were positive for methadone, 39 (1.5%) for cocaine and 2 (0.1%) for heroin. CONCLUSION: Given that the majority of patients in our study had expected urine results, it may be reasonable for less frequent urine testing in certain patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13722-021-00264-4. BioMed Central 2021-09-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8482571/ /pubmed/34593036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13722-021-00264-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sobel, Halle G. Warrington, Jill S. Francis-Fath, Samuel Crocker, Abigail M. Berger, Claudia A. A Descriptive analysis of urine drug screen results in patients with opioid use disorder managed in a primary care setting |
title | A Descriptive analysis of urine drug screen results in patients with opioid use disorder managed in a primary care setting |
title_full | A Descriptive analysis of urine drug screen results in patients with opioid use disorder managed in a primary care setting |
title_fullStr | A Descriptive analysis of urine drug screen results in patients with opioid use disorder managed in a primary care setting |
title_full_unstemmed | A Descriptive analysis of urine drug screen results in patients with opioid use disorder managed in a primary care setting |
title_short | A Descriptive analysis of urine drug screen results in patients with opioid use disorder managed in a primary care setting |
title_sort | descriptive analysis of urine drug screen results in patients with opioid use disorder managed in a primary care setting |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13722-021-00264-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sobelhalleg adescriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting AT warringtonjills adescriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting AT francisfathsamuel adescriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting AT crockerabigailm adescriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting AT bergerclaudiaa adescriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting AT sobelhalleg descriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting AT warringtonjills descriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting AT francisfathsamuel descriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting AT crockerabigailm descriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting AT bergerclaudiaa descriptiveanalysisofurinedrugscreenresultsinpatientswithopioidusedisordermanagedinaprimarycaresetting |