Cargando…
PAM-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring CRISPR-Cas systems
BACKGROUND: The adaptive CRISPR-Cas immune system stores sequences from past invaders as spacers in CRISPR arrays and thereby provides direct evidence that links invaders to hosts. Mapping CRISPR spacers has revealed many aspects of CRISPR-Cas biology, including target requirements such as the proto...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02495-9 |
_version_ | 1784576942629978112 |
---|---|
author | Vink, Jochem N. A. Baijens, Jan H. L. Brouns, Stan J. J. |
author_facet | Vink, Jochem N. A. Baijens, Jan H. L. Brouns, Stan J. J. |
author_sort | Vink, Jochem N. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The adaptive CRISPR-Cas immune system stores sequences from past invaders as spacers in CRISPR arrays and thereby provides direct evidence that links invaders to hosts. Mapping CRISPR spacers has revealed many aspects of CRISPR-Cas biology, including target requirements such as the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). However, studies have so far been limited by a low number of mapped spacers in the database. RESULTS: By using vast metagenomic sequence databases, we map approximately one-third of more than 200,000 unique CRISPR spacers from a variety of microbes and derive a catalog of more than two hundred unique PAM sequences associated with specific CRISPR-Cas subtypes. These PAMs are further used to correctly assign the orientation of CRISPR arrays, revealing conserved patterns between the last nucleotides of the CRISPR repeat and PAM. We could also deduce CRISPR-Cas subtype-specific preferences for targeting either template or coding strand of open reading frames. While some DNA-targeting systems (type I-E and type II systems) prefer the template strand and avoid mRNA, other DNA- and RNA-targeting systems (types I-A and I-B and type III systems) prefer the coding strand and mRNA. In addition, we find large-scale evidence that both CRISPR-Cas adaptation machinery and CRISPR arrays are shared between different CRISPR-Cas systems. This could lead to simultaneous DNA and RNA targeting of invaders, which may be effective at combating mobile genetic invaders. CONCLUSIONS: This study has broad implications for our understanding of how CRISPR-Cas systems work in a wide range of organisms for which only the genome sequence is known. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13059-021-02495-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8482600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84826002021-10-04 PAM-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring CRISPR-Cas systems Vink, Jochem N. A. Baijens, Jan H. L. Brouns, Stan J. J. Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: The adaptive CRISPR-Cas immune system stores sequences from past invaders as spacers in CRISPR arrays and thereby provides direct evidence that links invaders to hosts. Mapping CRISPR spacers has revealed many aspects of CRISPR-Cas biology, including target requirements such as the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). However, studies have so far been limited by a low number of mapped spacers in the database. RESULTS: By using vast metagenomic sequence databases, we map approximately one-third of more than 200,000 unique CRISPR spacers from a variety of microbes and derive a catalog of more than two hundred unique PAM sequences associated with specific CRISPR-Cas subtypes. These PAMs are further used to correctly assign the orientation of CRISPR arrays, revealing conserved patterns between the last nucleotides of the CRISPR repeat and PAM. We could also deduce CRISPR-Cas subtype-specific preferences for targeting either template or coding strand of open reading frames. While some DNA-targeting systems (type I-E and type II systems) prefer the template strand and avoid mRNA, other DNA- and RNA-targeting systems (types I-A and I-B and type III systems) prefer the coding strand and mRNA. In addition, we find large-scale evidence that both CRISPR-Cas adaptation machinery and CRISPR arrays are shared between different CRISPR-Cas systems. This could lead to simultaneous DNA and RNA targeting of invaders, which may be effective at combating mobile genetic invaders. CONCLUSIONS: This study has broad implications for our understanding of how CRISPR-Cas systems work in a wide range of organisms for which only the genome sequence is known. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13059-021-02495-9. BioMed Central 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8482600/ /pubmed/34593010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02495-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Vink, Jochem N. A. Baijens, Jan H. L. Brouns, Stan J. J. PAM-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring CRISPR-Cas systems |
title | PAM-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring CRISPR-Cas systems |
title_full | PAM-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring CRISPR-Cas systems |
title_fullStr | PAM-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring CRISPR-Cas systems |
title_full_unstemmed | PAM-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring CRISPR-Cas systems |
title_short | PAM-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring CRISPR-Cas systems |
title_sort | pam-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring crispr-cas systems |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02495-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vinkjochemna pamrepeatassociationsandspacerselectionpreferencesinsingleandcooccurringcrisprcassystems AT baijensjanhl pamrepeatassociationsandspacerselectionpreferencesinsingleandcooccurringcrisprcassystems AT brounsstanjj pamrepeatassociationsandspacerselectionpreferencesinsingleandcooccurringcrisprcassystems |