Cargando…

Increasing the power of interpretation for soil metaproteomics data

BACKGROUND: Soil and sediment microorganisms are highly phylogenetically diverse but are currently largely under-represented in public molecular databases. Their functional characterization by means of metaproteomics is usually performed using metagenomic sequences acquired for the same sample. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jouffret, Virginie, Miotello, Guylaine, Culotta, Karen, Ayrault, Sophie, Pible, Olivier, Armengaud, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01139-1
_version_ 1784576948795604992
author Jouffret, Virginie
Miotello, Guylaine
Culotta, Karen
Ayrault, Sophie
Pible, Olivier
Armengaud, Jean
author_facet Jouffret, Virginie
Miotello, Guylaine
Culotta, Karen
Ayrault, Sophie
Pible, Olivier
Armengaud, Jean
author_sort Jouffret, Virginie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Soil and sediment microorganisms are highly phylogenetically diverse but are currently largely under-represented in public molecular databases. Their functional characterization by means of metaproteomics is usually performed using metagenomic sequences acquired for the same sample. However, such hugely diverse metagenomic datasets are difficult to assemble; in parallel, theoretical proteomes from isolates available in generic databases are of high quality. Both these factors advocate for the use of theoretical proteomes in metaproteomics interpretation pipelines. Here, we examined a number of database construction strategies with a view to increasing the outputs of metaproteomics studies performed on soil samples. RESULTS: The number of peptide-spectrum matches was found to be of comparable magnitude when using public or sample-specific metagenomics-derived databases. However, numbers were significantly increased when a combination of both types of information was used in a two-step cascaded search. Our data also indicate that the functional annotation of the metaproteomics dataset can be maximized by using a combination of both types of databases. CONCLUSIONS: A two-step strategy combining sample-specific metagenome database and public databases such as the non-redundant NCBI database and a massive soil gene catalog allows maximizing the metaproteomic interpretation both in terms of ratio of assigned spectra and retrieval of function-derived information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-021-01139-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8482631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84826312021-10-04 Increasing the power of interpretation for soil metaproteomics data Jouffret, Virginie Miotello, Guylaine Culotta, Karen Ayrault, Sophie Pible, Olivier Armengaud, Jean Microbiome Methodology BACKGROUND: Soil and sediment microorganisms are highly phylogenetically diverse but are currently largely under-represented in public molecular databases. Their functional characterization by means of metaproteomics is usually performed using metagenomic sequences acquired for the same sample. However, such hugely diverse metagenomic datasets are difficult to assemble; in parallel, theoretical proteomes from isolates available in generic databases are of high quality. Both these factors advocate for the use of theoretical proteomes in metaproteomics interpretation pipelines. Here, we examined a number of database construction strategies with a view to increasing the outputs of metaproteomics studies performed on soil samples. RESULTS: The number of peptide-spectrum matches was found to be of comparable magnitude when using public or sample-specific metagenomics-derived databases. However, numbers were significantly increased when a combination of both types of information was used in a two-step cascaded search. Our data also indicate that the functional annotation of the metaproteomics dataset can be maximized by using a combination of both types of databases. CONCLUSIONS: A two-step strategy combining sample-specific metagenome database and public databases such as the non-redundant NCBI database and a massive soil gene catalog allows maximizing the metaproteomic interpretation both in terms of ratio of assigned spectra and retrieval of function-derived information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-021-01139-1. BioMed Central 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8482631/ /pubmed/34587999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01139-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Jouffret, Virginie
Miotello, Guylaine
Culotta, Karen
Ayrault, Sophie
Pible, Olivier
Armengaud, Jean
Increasing the power of interpretation for soil metaproteomics data
title Increasing the power of interpretation for soil metaproteomics data
title_full Increasing the power of interpretation for soil metaproteomics data
title_fullStr Increasing the power of interpretation for soil metaproteomics data
title_full_unstemmed Increasing the power of interpretation for soil metaproteomics data
title_short Increasing the power of interpretation for soil metaproteomics data
title_sort increasing the power of interpretation for soil metaproteomics data
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01139-1
work_keys_str_mv AT jouffretvirginie increasingthepowerofinterpretationforsoilmetaproteomicsdata
AT miotelloguylaine increasingthepowerofinterpretationforsoilmetaproteomicsdata
AT culottakaren increasingthepowerofinterpretationforsoilmetaproteomicsdata
AT ayraultsophie increasingthepowerofinterpretationforsoilmetaproteomicsdata
AT pibleolivier increasingthepowerofinterpretationforsoilmetaproteomicsdata
AT armengaudjean increasingthepowerofinterpretationforsoilmetaproteomicsdata