Cargando…

Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, UK

BACKGROUND: Increasing pressure threatens to overwhelm primary care services, affecting the quality of care and their role as gatekeepers to specialised care services. This study investigated healthcare users’ acceptability of – and the effectiveness of – an e-consultation system in primary care ser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nijhof, Dewy, Ingram, Andy, Ochieng, Rebecca, Roberts, Emma-Jane, Poulton, Barnaby, Ochieng, Bertha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07039-2
_version_ 1784576973224280064
author Nijhof, Dewy
Ingram, Andy
Ochieng, Rebecca
Roberts, Emma-Jane
Poulton, Barnaby
Ochieng, Bertha
author_facet Nijhof, Dewy
Ingram, Andy
Ochieng, Rebecca
Roberts, Emma-Jane
Poulton, Barnaby
Ochieng, Bertha
author_sort Nijhof, Dewy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing pressure threatens to overwhelm primary care services, affecting the quality of care and their role as gatekeepers to specialised care services. This study investigated healthcare users’ acceptability of – and the effectiveness of – an e-consultation system in primary care services. METHODS: Seven GP practices in East-Midlands, all of whom use online consultation system participated in the study, with a retrospective review being undertaken of 189 electronic patients’ records (age range of 18–76 years) over 5 months. The focus was on the electronic records of patients who accessed the service for five different conditions identified as presenting common conditions seen by the GPs practices. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS to perform an exploratory data analysis and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The results showed a positive reception of the online consultation platform, with an average satisfaction score of 4.15 (most likely to recommend score = 5). Given the nature of the conditions, 47.6% of patients had experienced a previous episode of the health condition they were seeking consultation for, and a total of 72% had existing comorbidities. Follow-up activity occurred for 87.3% of patients, 66.1% of which included at least one follow-up visit for the same condition as the initial online consultation. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that online consultation is convenient for patients, and it also has the potential to relieve pressure placed on primary care services. Although a number of challenges were identified, such as patient verification, this study gives insight into – and enhances our understanding of – the use of online GP consultations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8482740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84827402021-09-30 Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, UK Nijhof, Dewy Ingram, Andy Ochieng, Rebecca Roberts, Emma-Jane Poulton, Barnaby Ochieng, Bertha BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Increasing pressure threatens to overwhelm primary care services, affecting the quality of care and their role as gatekeepers to specialised care services. This study investigated healthcare users’ acceptability of – and the effectiveness of – an e-consultation system in primary care services. METHODS: Seven GP practices in East-Midlands, all of whom use online consultation system participated in the study, with a retrospective review being undertaken of 189 electronic patients’ records (age range of 18–76 years) over 5 months. The focus was on the electronic records of patients who accessed the service for five different conditions identified as presenting common conditions seen by the GPs practices. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS to perform an exploratory data analysis and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The results showed a positive reception of the online consultation platform, with an average satisfaction score of 4.15 (most likely to recommend score = 5). Given the nature of the conditions, 47.6% of patients had experienced a previous episode of the health condition they were seeking consultation for, and a total of 72% had existing comorbidities. Follow-up activity occurred for 87.3% of patients, 66.1% of which included at least one follow-up visit for the same condition as the initial online consultation. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that online consultation is convenient for patients, and it also has the potential to relieve pressure placed on primary care services. Although a number of challenges were identified, such as patient verification, this study gives insight into – and enhances our understanding of – the use of online GP consultations. BioMed Central 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8482740/ /pubmed/34592980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07039-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nijhof, Dewy
Ingram, Andy
Ochieng, Rebecca
Roberts, Emma-Jane
Poulton, Barnaby
Ochieng, Bertha
Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, UK
title Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, UK
title_full Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, UK
title_fullStr Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, UK
title_full_unstemmed Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, UK
title_short Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, UK
title_sort examining gp online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, uk
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07039-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nijhofdewy examininggponlineconsultationinaprimarycaresettingineastmidlandsuk
AT ingramandy examininggponlineconsultationinaprimarycaresettingineastmidlandsuk
AT ochiengrebecca examininggponlineconsultationinaprimarycaresettingineastmidlandsuk
AT robertsemmajane examininggponlineconsultationinaprimarycaresettingineastmidlandsuk
AT poultonbarnaby examininggponlineconsultationinaprimarycaresettingineastmidlandsuk
AT ochiengbertha examininggponlineconsultationinaprimarycaresettingineastmidlandsuk