Cargando…
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience
Background: Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are becoming widespread, accounting for approximately 2% of all births in the western countries. Concerns exist on the potential association of ART with congenital anomalies. Few studies have addressed if a relationship exists between ART and the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.705385 |
_version_ | 1784576997633032192 |
---|---|
author | Iacusso, Chiara Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela Morini, Francesco Totonelli, Giorgia Viggiano, Milena Caforio, Leonardo Bagolan, Pietro |
author_facet | Iacusso, Chiara Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela Morini, Francesco Totonelli, Giorgia Viggiano, Milena Caforio, Leonardo Bagolan, Pietro |
author_sort | Iacusso, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are becoming widespread, accounting for approximately 2% of all births in the western countries. Concerns exist on the potential association of ART with congenital anomalies. Few studies have addressed if a relationship exists between ART and the development of anorectal malformation (ARM). Our aim was to analyze the relationship between ARM and ART. Methods: Single-center retrospective case control study of all patients treated for ARM between 2010 and 2017. Patients with bronchiolitis treated since 2014 were used as controls. Variables analyzed include the following: prevalence of ART, gestational age, birth weight, and maternal age. Patients with ARM born after ART were also compared with those naturally conceived for disease complexity. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used as appropriate. Results: Three hundred sixty-nine patients were analyzed (143 cases and 226 controls). Prevalence of ART was significantly higher in ARM patients than in controls [7.6 vs. 3.0%; odds ratio: 2.59 (95% CI, 0.98–0.68); p = 0.05]. Among ARM patients, incidence of VACTERL association (17%) is more frequent in ART babies. Conclusion: Patients with ARM were more likely to be conceived following ART as compared with controls without congenital anomalies. Disease complexity of patients with ARM born after ART seems greater that those born after nonassisted conception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8482871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84828712021-10-01 Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience Iacusso, Chiara Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela Morini, Francesco Totonelli, Giorgia Viggiano, Milena Caforio, Leonardo Bagolan, Pietro Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are becoming widespread, accounting for approximately 2% of all births in the western countries. Concerns exist on the potential association of ART with congenital anomalies. Few studies have addressed if a relationship exists between ART and the development of anorectal malformation (ARM). Our aim was to analyze the relationship between ARM and ART. Methods: Single-center retrospective case control study of all patients treated for ARM between 2010 and 2017. Patients with bronchiolitis treated since 2014 were used as controls. Variables analyzed include the following: prevalence of ART, gestational age, birth weight, and maternal age. Patients with ARM born after ART were also compared with those naturally conceived for disease complexity. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used as appropriate. Results: Three hundred sixty-nine patients were analyzed (143 cases and 226 controls). Prevalence of ART was significantly higher in ARM patients than in controls [7.6 vs. 3.0%; odds ratio: 2.59 (95% CI, 0.98–0.68); p = 0.05]. Among ARM patients, incidence of VACTERL association (17%) is more frequent in ART babies. Conclusion: Patients with ARM were more likely to be conceived following ART as compared with controls without congenital anomalies. Disease complexity of patients with ARM born after ART seems greater that those born after nonassisted conception. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8482871/ /pubmed/34604138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.705385 Text en Copyright © 2021 Iacusso, Iacobelli, Morini, Totonelli, Viggiano, Caforio and Bagolan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics Iacusso, Chiara Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela Morini, Francesco Totonelli, Giorgia Viggiano, Milena Caforio, Leonardo Bagolan, Pietro Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience |
title | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience |
title_fullStr | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience |
title_short | Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience |
title_sort | assisted reproductive technology and anorectal malformation: a single-center experience |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.705385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iacussochiara assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience AT iacobellibarbaradaniela assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience AT morinifrancesco assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience AT totonelligiorgia assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience AT viggianomilena assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience AT caforioleonardo assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience AT bagolanpietro assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience |