Cargando…

Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience

Background: Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are becoming widespread, accounting for approximately 2% of all births in the western countries. Concerns exist on the potential association of ART with congenital anomalies. Few studies have addressed if a relationship exists between ART and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iacusso, Chiara, Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela, Morini, Francesco, Totonelli, Giorgia, Viggiano, Milena, Caforio, Leonardo, Bagolan, Pietro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.705385
_version_ 1784576997633032192
author Iacusso, Chiara
Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela
Morini, Francesco
Totonelli, Giorgia
Viggiano, Milena
Caforio, Leonardo
Bagolan, Pietro
author_facet Iacusso, Chiara
Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela
Morini, Francesco
Totonelli, Giorgia
Viggiano, Milena
Caforio, Leonardo
Bagolan, Pietro
author_sort Iacusso, Chiara
collection PubMed
description Background: Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are becoming widespread, accounting for approximately 2% of all births in the western countries. Concerns exist on the potential association of ART with congenital anomalies. Few studies have addressed if a relationship exists between ART and the development of anorectal malformation (ARM). Our aim was to analyze the relationship between ARM and ART. Methods: Single-center retrospective case control study of all patients treated for ARM between 2010 and 2017. Patients with bronchiolitis treated since 2014 were used as controls. Variables analyzed include the following: prevalence of ART, gestational age, birth weight, and maternal age. Patients with ARM born after ART were also compared with those naturally conceived for disease complexity. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used as appropriate. Results: Three hundred sixty-nine patients were analyzed (143 cases and 226 controls). Prevalence of ART was significantly higher in ARM patients than in controls [7.6 vs. 3.0%; odds ratio: 2.59 (95% CI, 0.98–0.68); p = 0.05]. Among ARM patients, incidence of VACTERL association (17%) is more frequent in ART babies. Conclusion: Patients with ARM were more likely to be conceived following ART as compared with controls without congenital anomalies. Disease complexity of patients with ARM born after ART seems greater that those born after nonassisted conception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8482871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84828712021-10-01 Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience Iacusso, Chiara Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela Morini, Francesco Totonelli, Giorgia Viggiano, Milena Caforio, Leonardo Bagolan, Pietro Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are becoming widespread, accounting for approximately 2% of all births in the western countries. Concerns exist on the potential association of ART with congenital anomalies. Few studies have addressed if a relationship exists between ART and the development of anorectal malformation (ARM). Our aim was to analyze the relationship between ARM and ART. Methods: Single-center retrospective case control study of all patients treated for ARM between 2010 and 2017. Patients with bronchiolitis treated since 2014 were used as controls. Variables analyzed include the following: prevalence of ART, gestational age, birth weight, and maternal age. Patients with ARM born after ART were also compared with those naturally conceived for disease complexity. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used as appropriate. Results: Three hundred sixty-nine patients were analyzed (143 cases and 226 controls). Prevalence of ART was significantly higher in ARM patients than in controls [7.6 vs. 3.0%; odds ratio: 2.59 (95% CI, 0.98–0.68); p = 0.05]. Among ARM patients, incidence of VACTERL association (17%) is more frequent in ART babies. Conclusion: Patients with ARM were more likely to be conceived following ART as compared with controls without congenital anomalies. Disease complexity of patients with ARM born after ART seems greater that those born after nonassisted conception. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8482871/ /pubmed/34604138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.705385 Text en Copyright © 2021 Iacusso, Iacobelli, Morini, Totonelli, Viggiano, Caforio and Bagolan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Iacusso, Chiara
Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela
Morini, Francesco
Totonelli, Giorgia
Viggiano, Milena
Caforio, Leonardo
Bagolan, Pietro
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience
title Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Assisted Reproductive Technology and Anorectal Malformation: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort assisted reproductive technology and anorectal malformation: a single-center experience
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.705385
work_keys_str_mv AT iacussochiara assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience
AT iacobellibarbaradaniela assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience
AT morinifrancesco assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience
AT totonelligiorgia assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience
AT viggianomilena assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience
AT caforioleonardo assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience
AT bagolanpietro assistedreproductivetechnologyandanorectalmalformationasinglecenterexperience