Cargando…

Scaling-up social needs screening in practice: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records from Bronx county, New York, USA

OBJECTIVES: There has been renewed focus on health systems integrating social care to improve health outcomes with relatively less related research focusing on ‘real-world’ practice. This study describes a health system’s experience from 2018 to 2020, following the successful pilot in 2017, to scale...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiori, Kevin P, Heller, Caroline G, Flattau, Anna, Harris-Hollingsworth, Nicole R, Parsons, Amanda, Rinke, Michael L, Chambers, Earle, Hodgson, Sybil, Chodon, Tashi, Racine, Andrew D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053633
_version_ 1784577037600555008
author Fiori, Kevin P
Heller, Caroline G
Flattau, Anna
Harris-Hollingsworth, Nicole R
Parsons, Amanda
Rinke, Michael L
Chambers, Earle
Hodgson, Sybil
Chodon, Tashi
Racine, Andrew D
author_facet Fiori, Kevin P
Heller, Caroline G
Flattau, Anna
Harris-Hollingsworth, Nicole R
Parsons, Amanda
Rinke, Michael L
Chambers, Earle
Hodgson, Sybil
Chodon, Tashi
Racine, Andrew D
author_sort Fiori, Kevin P
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There has been renewed focus on health systems integrating social care to improve health outcomes with relatively less related research focusing on ‘real-world’ practice. This study describes a health system’s experience from 2018 to 2020, following the successful pilot in 2017, to scale social needs screening of patients within a large urban primary care ambulatory network. SETTING: Academic medical centre with an ambulatory network of 18 primary care practices located in an urban county in New York City (USA). PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study used electronic health records of 244 764 patients who had a clinical visit between 10 April 2018 and 8 December 2019 across any one of 18 primary care practices. METHODS: We organised measures using the RE-AIM framework domains of reach and adoption to ascertain the number of patients who were screened and the number of providers who adopted screening and associated documentation, respectively. We used descriptive statistics to summarise factors comparing patients screened versus those not screened, the prevalence of social needs screening and adoption across 18 practices. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and December 2019, 53 093 patients were screened for social needs, representing approximately 21.7% of the patients seen. Almost one-fifth (19.6%) of patients reported at least one unmet social need. The percentage of screened patients varied by both practice location (range 1.6%–81.6%) and specialty within practices. 51.8% of providers (n=1316) screened at least one patient. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate both the potential and challenges of integrating social care in practice. We observed significant variability in uptake across the health system. More research is needed to better understand factors driving adoption and may include harmonising workflows, establishing unified targets and using data to drive improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8483051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84830512021-10-08 Scaling-up social needs screening in practice: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records from Bronx county, New York, USA Fiori, Kevin P Heller, Caroline G Flattau, Anna Harris-Hollingsworth, Nicole R Parsons, Amanda Rinke, Michael L Chambers, Earle Hodgson, Sybil Chodon, Tashi Racine, Andrew D BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: There has been renewed focus on health systems integrating social care to improve health outcomes with relatively less related research focusing on ‘real-world’ practice. This study describes a health system’s experience from 2018 to 2020, following the successful pilot in 2017, to scale social needs screening of patients within a large urban primary care ambulatory network. SETTING: Academic medical centre with an ambulatory network of 18 primary care practices located in an urban county in New York City (USA). PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study used electronic health records of 244 764 patients who had a clinical visit between 10 April 2018 and 8 December 2019 across any one of 18 primary care practices. METHODS: We organised measures using the RE-AIM framework domains of reach and adoption to ascertain the number of patients who were screened and the number of providers who adopted screening and associated documentation, respectively. We used descriptive statistics to summarise factors comparing patients screened versus those not screened, the prevalence of social needs screening and adoption across 18 practices. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and December 2019, 53 093 patients were screened for social needs, representing approximately 21.7% of the patients seen. Almost one-fifth (19.6%) of patients reported at least one unmet social need. The percentage of screened patients varied by both practice location (range 1.6%–81.6%) and specialty within practices. 51.8% of providers (n=1316) screened at least one patient. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate both the potential and challenges of integrating social care in practice. We observed significant variability in uptake across the health system. More research is needed to better understand factors driving adoption and may include harmonising workflows, establishing unified targets and using data to drive improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8483051/ /pubmed/34588265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053633 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Fiori, Kevin P
Heller, Caroline G
Flattau, Anna
Harris-Hollingsworth, Nicole R
Parsons, Amanda
Rinke, Michael L
Chambers, Earle
Hodgson, Sybil
Chodon, Tashi
Racine, Andrew D
Scaling-up social needs screening in practice: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records from Bronx county, New York, USA
title Scaling-up social needs screening in practice: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records from Bronx county, New York, USA
title_full Scaling-up social needs screening in practice: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records from Bronx county, New York, USA
title_fullStr Scaling-up social needs screening in practice: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records from Bronx county, New York, USA
title_full_unstemmed Scaling-up social needs screening in practice: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records from Bronx county, New York, USA
title_short Scaling-up social needs screening in practice: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records from Bronx county, New York, USA
title_sort scaling-up social needs screening in practice: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from electronic health records from bronx county, new york, usa
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053633
work_keys_str_mv AT fiorikevinp scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa
AT hellercarolineg scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa
AT flattauanna scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa
AT harrishollingsworthnicoler scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa
AT parsonsamanda scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa
AT rinkemichaell scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa
AT chambersearle scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa
AT hodgsonsybil scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa
AT chodontashi scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa
AT racineandrewd scalingupsocialneedsscreeninginpracticearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysisofdatafromelectronichealthrecordsfrombronxcountynewyorkusa