Cargando…

Development and validation of a patient‐reported outcome measure for patients with chronic respiratory failure: The CRF‐PROM scale

BACKGROUND: Various health‐related quality‐of‐life (HRQOL) tools are used to evaluate patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF), but there is a relative lack of tools available for the evaluation of social support and treatment in these patients. The present study focused on the development of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Hangzhi, Li, Hao, Zeng, Xianhua, Zhao, Hui, Zhang, Yanbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13324
_version_ 1784577072700588032
author He, Hangzhi
Li, Hao
Zeng, Xianhua
Zhao, Hui
Zhang, Yanbo
author_facet He, Hangzhi
Li, Hao
Zeng, Xianhua
Zhao, Hui
Zhang, Yanbo
author_sort He, Hangzhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various health‐related quality‐of‐life (HRQOL) tools are used to evaluate patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF), but there is a relative lack of tools available for the evaluation of social support and treatment in these patients. The present study focused on the development of a systematic patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM) tool for use in patients with CRF. METHODS: The CRF‐PROM scale conceptual framework and item bank were generated after reviewing the corresponding literature and HRQOL scales, interviewing CRF patients and focus groups. After creation of the initial scale, the items in the scale were selected through two item selection theories, and the final scale was created. The reliability, validity and feasibility of the final scale were assessed. RESULTS: The CRF‐PROM scale includes four domains (i.e., physiological domain, psychological domain, social domain and therapeutic domain) and 10 dimensions. After the item selection process, the final scale included 50 items. Cronbach's α coefficients, which were all above 0.7, indicated the reliability of the scale. The results of structural validity met the relevant standards of confirmatory factor analysis. The response rates of the preinvestigation and the formal investigation were 93.3% and 97.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CRF‐PROM scale developed in the present study is effective and reliable. It could be used widely in the posthospital management of patients, in CRF studies and in clinical trials of new medical products and interventions. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Participants from eight different hospitals and communities participated in the development or validation phase of the CRF‐PROM scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8483203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84832032021-10-06 Development and validation of a patient‐reported outcome measure for patients with chronic respiratory failure: The CRF‐PROM scale He, Hangzhi Li, Hao Zeng, Xianhua Zhao, Hui Zhang, Yanbo Health Expect Original Articles BACKGROUND: Various health‐related quality‐of‐life (HRQOL) tools are used to evaluate patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF), but there is a relative lack of tools available for the evaluation of social support and treatment in these patients. The present study focused on the development of a systematic patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM) tool for use in patients with CRF. METHODS: The CRF‐PROM scale conceptual framework and item bank were generated after reviewing the corresponding literature and HRQOL scales, interviewing CRF patients and focus groups. After creation of the initial scale, the items in the scale were selected through two item selection theories, and the final scale was created. The reliability, validity and feasibility of the final scale were assessed. RESULTS: The CRF‐PROM scale includes four domains (i.e., physiological domain, psychological domain, social domain and therapeutic domain) and 10 dimensions. After the item selection process, the final scale included 50 items. Cronbach's α coefficients, which were all above 0.7, indicated the reliability of the scale. The results of structural validity met the relevant standards of confirmatory factor analysis. The response rates of the preinvestigation and the formal investigation were 93.3% and 97.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CRF‐PROM scale developed in the present study is effective and reliable. It could be used widely in the posthospital management of patients, in CRF studies and in clinical trials of new medical products and interventions. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Participants from eight different hospitals and communities participated in the development or validation phase of the CRF‐PROM scale. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-01 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8483203/ /pubmed/34337839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13324 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
He, Hangzhi
Li, Hao
Zeng, Xianhua
Zhao, Hui
Zhang, Yanbo
Development and validation of a patient‐reported outcome measure for patients with chronic respiratory failure: The CRF‐PROM scale
title Development and validation of a patient‐reported outcome measure for patients with chronic respiratory failure: The CRF‐PROM scale
title_full Development and validation of a patient‐reported outcome measure for patients with chronic respiratory failure: The CRF‐PROM scale
title_fullStr Development and validation of a patient‐reported outcome measure for patients with chronic respiratory failure: The CRF‐PROM scale
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a patient‐reported outcome measure for patients with chronic respiratory failure: The CRF‐PROM scale
title_short Development and validation of a patient‐reported outcome measure for patients with chronic respiratory failure: The CRF‐PROM scale
title_sort development and validation of a patient‐reported outcome measure for patients with chronic respiratory failure: the crf‐prom scale
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13324
work_keys_str_mv AT hehangzhi developmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforpatientswithchronicrespiratoryfailurethecrfpromscale
AT lihao developmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforpatientswithchronicrespiratoryfailurethecrfpromscale
AT zengxianhua developmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforpatientswithchronicrespiratoryfailurethecrfpromscale
AT zhaohui developmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforpatientswithchronicrespiratoryfailurethecrfpromscale
AT zhangyanbo developmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforpatientswithchronicrespiratoryfailurethecrfpromscale