Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is appreciated as a promising model of communication between clinicians and patients. However, in acute mental health settings, its implementation is still unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine barriers and facilitators of SDM with ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becher, Stefanie, Holzhüter, Fabian, Heres, Stephan, Hamann, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13313
_version_ 1784577073483874304
author Becher, Stefanie
Holzhüter, Fabian
Heres, Stephan
Hamann, Johannes
author_facet Becher, Stefanie
Holzhüter, Fabian
Heres, Stephan
Hamann, Johannes
author_sort Becher, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is appreciated as a promising model of communication between clinicians and patients. However, in acute mental health settings, its implementation is still unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine barriers and facilitators of SDM with acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The analysis is based on interviews with participants (patients and staff members) of the intervention group of the randomised‐controlled SDM(PLUS) trial that demonstrated a significant improvement of SDM measures for patients with schizophrenia on acute psychiatric wards. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Interviews addressed treatment decisions made during the current inpatient stay. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40 interviews were analysed and 131 treatment decisions were identified. According to the interviewees, SDM had taken place in 29% of the decisions, whereas 59% of the decisions were made without SDM. In 16%, a clear judgement could not be made. Barriers and facilitators of SDM were categorised into patient factors, clinician factors, setting factors and others. Clinicians mostly reported patient factors (e.g., symptoms) as barriers towards SDM, which were not mirrored on the patients' side. Facilitators included patient as well as clinician behaviour during consultations. CONCLUSION: Even in the context of a successful SDM intervention, the implementation of SDM for patients in the very acute stages of schizophrenia is often not possible. However, strong facilitators for SDM have also been identified, which should be used for further implementation of SDM. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: During the development of the study protocol, meetings with user representatives were held.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8483208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84832082021-10-06 Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial Becher, Stefanie Holzhüter, Fabian Heres, Stephan Hamann, Johannes Health Expect Original Articles BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is appreciated as a promising model of communication between clinicians and patients. However, in acute mental health settings, its implementation is still unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine barriers and facilitators of SDM with acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The analysis is based on interviews with participants (patients and staff members) of the intervention group of the randomised‐controlled SDM(PLUS) trial that demonstrated a significant improvement of SDM measures for patients with schizophrenia on acute psychiatric wards. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Interviews addressed treatment decisions made during the current inpatient stay. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40 interviews were analysed and 131 treatment decisions were identified. According to the interviewees, SDM had taken place in 29% of the decisions, whereas 59% of the decisions were made without SDM. In 16%, a clear judgement could not be made. Barriers and facilitators of SDM were categorised into patient factors, clinician factors, setting factors and others. Clinicians mostly reported patient factors (e.g., symptoms) as barriers towards SDM, which were not mirrored on the patients' side. Facilitators included patient as well as clinician behaviour during consultations. CONCLUSION: Even in the context of a successful SDM intervention, the implementation of SDM for patients in the very acute stages of schizophrenia is often not possible. However, strong facilitators for SDM have also been identified, which should be used for further implementation of SDM. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: During the development of the study protocol, meetings with user representatives were held. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-13 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8483208/ /pubmed/34258833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13313 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Becher, Stefanie
Holzhüter, Fabian
Heres, Stephan
Hamann, Johannes
Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
title Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
title_full Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
title_short Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
title_sort barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13313
work_keys_str_mv AT becherstefanie barriersandfacilitatorsofshareddecisionmakinginacutelyillinpatientswithschizophreniaqualitativefindingsfromtheinterventiongroupofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT holzhuterfabian barriersandfacilitatorsofshareddecisionmakinginacutelyillinpatientswithschizophreniaqualitativefindingsfromtheinterventiongroupofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT heresstephan barriersandfacilitatorsofshareddecisionmakinginacutelyillinpatientswithschizophreniaqualitativefindingsfromtheinterventiongroupofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hamannjohannes barriersandfacilitatorsofshareddecisionmakinginacutelyillinpatientswithschizophreniaqualitativefindingsfromtheinterventiongroupofarandomisedcontrolledtrial