Cargando…

A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Involving patients and members of the public, together with researchers, in decisions about how studies are designed and conducted can create a study that is more person‐centred. The aim of this consultation process was to explore ways of designing a study which takes the person into con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rix, Jacqueline, Docherty, Sharon, Breen, Alexander C., Sewell, Philip, Branney, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13304
_version_ 1784577074246189056
author Rix, Jacqueline
Docherty, Sharon
Breen, Alexander C.
Sewell, Philip
Branney, Jonathan
author_facet Rix, Jacqueline
Docherty, Sharon
Breen, Alexander C.
Sewell, Philip
Branney, Jonathan
author_sort Rix, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Involving patients and members of the public, together with researchers, in decisions about how studies are designed and conducted can create a study that is more person‐centred. The aim of this consultation process was to explore ways of designing a study which takes the person into consideration for the randomized clinical study entitled ‘Biomechanical Effects of Manual Therapy—A Feasibility Study’ using the novel approach of usability testing. DESIGN: Patient and public volunteers were sought with experience of low back pain. Volunteers were invited to participate in usability testing (a physical walkthrough) of the proposed study method. This was followed by a discussion of areas where usability testing could not be used, such as recruitment strategies, continuity of participant care and dissemination of results. Resulting feedback was considered by the research team and alterations to the original study method were incorporated, provided the research questions could be answered and were practical within the resources available. RESULTS: Additional recruitment strategies were proposed. Alterations to the study included reduction in study time burden; completion of study paperwork in a quieter location; continuity of participant care after the study; and methods of dissemination of overall study results to participants. CONCLUSION: The consultation process used the unique method of usability testing, together with a post‐usability discussion, and resulted in alterations to the future study which may facilitate making it more person‐centred. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and public developed the future study design but did not participate in manuscript preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8483211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84832112021-10-06 A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial Rix, Jacqueline Docherty, Sharon Breen, Alexander C. Sewell, Philip Branney, Jonathan Health Expect Original Articles BACKGROUND: Involving patients and members of the public, together with researchers, in decisions about how studies are designed and conducted can create a study that is more person‐centred. The aim of this consultation process was to explore ways of designing a study which takes the person into consideration for the randomized clinical study entitled ‘Biomechanical Effects of Manual Therapy—A Feasibility Study’ using the novel approach of usability testing. DESIGN: Patient and public volunteers were sought with experience of low back pain. Volunteers were invited to participate in usability testing (a physical walkthrough) of the proposed study method. This was followed by a discussion of areas where usability testing could not be used, such as recruitment strategies, continuity of participant care and dissemination of results. Resulting feedback was considered by the research team and alterations to the original study method were incorporated, provided the research questions could be answered and were practical within the resources available. RESULTS: Additional recruitment strategies were proposed. Alterations to the study included reduction in study time burden; completion of study paperwork in a quieter location; continuity of participant care after the study; and methods of dissemination of overall study results to participants. CONCLUSION: The consultation process used the unique method of usability testing, together with a post‐usability discussion, and resulted in alterations to the future study which may facilitate making it more person‐centred. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and public developed the future study design but did not participate in manuscript preparation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-05 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8483211/ /pubmed/34223683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13304 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rix, Jacqueline
Docherty, Sharon
Breen, Alexander C.
Sewell, Philip
Branney, Jonathan
A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial
title A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial
title_full A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial
title_short A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial
title_sort public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13304
work_keys_str_mv AT rixjacqueline apublicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dochertysharon apublicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT breenalexanderc apublicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sewellphilip apublicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT branneyjonathan apublicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rixjacqueline publicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dochertysharon publicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT breenalexanderc publicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sewellphilip publicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT branneyjonathan publicandpatientconsultationprocessasanaidtodesignapersoncentredrandomizedclinicaltrial