Cargando…
Risk Prediction in Women With Congenital Long QT Syndrome
BACKGROUND: We aimed to provide personalized risk estimates for cardiac events (CEs) and life‐threatening events in women with either type 1 or type 2 long QT. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prognostic model was derived from the Rochester Long QT Syndrome Registry, comprising 767 women with type 1 long QT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34238014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021088 |
_version_ | 1784577130615537664 |
---|---|
author | Goldenberg, Ilan Bos, J. Martijn Yoruk, Ayhan Chen, Anita Y. Lopes, Coeli Huang, David T. Kutyifa, Valentina Younis, Arwa Aktas, Mehmet K. Z. Rosero, Spencer McNitt, Scott Sotoodehnia, Nona Kudenchuk, Peter J. Rea, Thomas D. Arking, Dan E. Scott, Christopher G. Briske, Kaylie A. Sorensen, Katrina J. Ackerman, Michael Zareba, Wojciech |
author_facet | Goldenberg, Ilan Bos, J. Martijn Yoruk, Ayhan Chen, Anita Y. Lopes, Coeli Huang, David T. Kutyifa, Valentina Younis, Arwa Aktas, Mehmet K. Z. Rosero, Spencer McNitt, Scott Sotoodehnia, Nona Kudenchuk, Peter J. Rea, Thomas D. Arking, Dan E. Scott, Christopher G. Briske, Kaylie A. Sorensen, Katrina J. Ackerman, Michael Zareba, Wojciech |
author_sort | Goldenberg, Ilan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to provide personalized risk estimates for cardiac events (CEs) and life‐threatening events in women with either type 1 or type 2 long QT. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prognostic model was derived from the Rochester Long QT Syndrome Registry, comprising 767 women with type 1 long QT (n=404) and type 2 long QT (n=363) from age 15 through 60 years. The risk prediction model included the following variables: genotype/mutation location, QTc‐specific thresholds, history of syncope, and β‐blocker therapy. A model was developed with the end point of CEs (syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, or long QT syndrome–related sudden cardiac death), and was applied with the end point of life‐threatening events (aborted cardiac arrest, sudden cardiac death, or appropriate defibrillator shocks). External validation was performed with data from the Mayo Clinic Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic (N=467; type 1 long QT [n=286] and type 2 long QT [n=181]). The cumulative follow‐up duration among the 767 enrolled women was 22 243 patient‐years, during which 323 patients (42%) experienced ≥1 CE. Based on genotype‐phenotype data, we identified 3 risk groups with 10‐year projected rates of CEs ranging from 15%, 29%, to 51%. The corresponding 10‐year projected rates of life‐threatening events were 2%, 5%, and 14%. C statistics for the prediction model for the 2 respective end points were 0.68 (95% CI 0.65–0.71) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.66–0.76). Corresponding C statistics for the model in the external validation Mayo Clinic cohort were 0.65 (95% CI 0.60–0.70) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.70–0.84). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first risk prediction model that provides absolute risk estimates for CEs and life‐threatening events in women with type 1 or type 2 long QT based on personalized genotype‐phenotype data. The projected risk estimates can be used to guide female‐specific management in long QT syndrome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8483453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84834532021-10-06 Risk Prediction in Women With Congenital Long QT Syndrome Goldenberg, Ilan Bos, J. Martijn Yoruk, Ayhan Chen, Anita Y. Lopes, Coeli Huang, David T. Kutyifa, Valentina Younis, Arwa Aktas, Mehmet K. Z. Rosero, Spencer McNitt, Scott Sotoodehnia, Nona Kudenchuk, Peter J. Rea, Thomas D. Arking, Dan E. Scott, Christopher G. Briske, Kaylie A. Sorensen, Katrina J. Ackerman, Michael Zareba, Wojciech J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: We aimed to provide personalized risk estimates for cardiac events (CEs) and life‐threatening events in women with either type 1 or type 2 long QT. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prognostic model was derived from the Rochester Long QT Syndrome Registry, comprising 767 women with type 1 long QT (n=404) and type 2 long QT (n=363) from age 15 through 60 years. The risk prediction model included the following variables: genotype/mutation location, QTc‐specific thresholds, history of syncope, and β‐blocker therapy. A model was developed with the end point of CEs (syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, or long QT syndrome–related sudden cardiac death), and was applied with the end point of life‐threatening events (aborted cardiac arrest, sudden cardiac death, or appropriate defibrillator shocks). External validation was performed with data from the Mayo Clinic Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic (N=467; type 1 long QT [n=286] and type 2 long QT [n=181]). The cumulative follow‐up duration among the 767 enrolled women was 22 243 patient‐years, during which 323 patients (42%) experienced ≥1 CE. Based on genotype‐phenotype data, we identified 3 risk groups with 10‐year projected rates of CEs ranging from 15%, 29%, to 51%. The corresponding 10‐year projected rates of life‐threatening events were 2%, 5%, and 14%. C statistics for the prediction model for the 2 respective end points were 0.68 (95% CI 0.65–0.71) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.66–0.76). Corresponding C statistics for the model in the external validation Mayo Clinic cohort were 0.65 (95% CI 0.60–0.70) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.70–0.84). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first risk prediction model that provides absolute risk estimates for CEs and life‐threatening events in women with type 1 or type 2 long QT based on personalized genotype‐phenotype data. The projected risk estimates can be used to guide female‐specific management in long QT syndrome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8483453/ /pubmed/34238014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021088 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Goldenberg, Ilan Bos, J. Martijn Yoruk, Ayhan Chen, Anita Y. Lopes, Coeli Huang, David T. Kutyifa, Valentina Younis, Arwa Aktas, Mehmet K. Z. Rosero, Spencer McNitt, Scott Sotoodehnia, Nona Kudenchuk, Peter J. Rea, Thomas D. Arking, Dan E. Scott, Christopher G. Briske, Kaylie A. Sorensen, Katrina J. Ackerman, Michael Zareba, Wojciech Risk Prediction in Women With Congenital Long QT Syndrome |
title | Risk Prediction in Women With Congenital Long QT Syndrome |
title_full | Risk Prediction in Women With Congenital Long QT Syndrome |
title_fullStr | Risk Prediction in Women With Congenital Long QT Syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Prediction in Women With Congenital Long QT Syndrome |
title_short | Risk Prediction in Women With Congenital Long QT Syndrome |
title_sort | risk prediction in women with congenital long qt syndrome |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34238014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldenbergilan riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT bosjmartijn riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT yorukayhan riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT chenanitay riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT lopescoeli riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT huangdavidt riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT kutyifavalentina riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT younisarwa riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT aktasmehmetk riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT zroserospencer riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT mcnittscott riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT sotoodehnianona riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT kudenchukpeterj riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT reathomasd riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT arkingdane riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT scottchristopherg riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT briskekayliea riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT sorensenkatrina riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT jackermanmichael riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome AT zarebawojciech riskpredictioninwomenwithcongenitallongqtsyndrome |