Cargando…

Arrhythmia Risk During the 2016 US Presidential Election: The Cost of Stressful Politics

BACKGROUND: Anger and extreme stress can trigger potentially fatal cardiovascular events in susceptible people. Political elections, such as the 2016 US presidential election, are significant stressors. Whether they can trigger cardiac arrhythmias is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosman, Lindsey, Salmoirago‐Blotcher, Elena, Mahmood, Rafat, Yang, Hannan, Li, Quefeng, Mazzella, Anthony J., Lawrence Klein, Jeffrey, Bumgarner, Joseph, Gehi, Anil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020559
_version_ 1784577143882121216
author Rosman, Lindsey
Salmoirago‐Blotcher, Elena
Mahmood, Rafat
Yang, Hannan
Li, Quefeng
Mazzella, Anthony J.
Lawrence Klein, Jeffrey
Bumgarner, Joseph
Gehi, Anil
author_facet Rosman, Lindsey
Salmoirago‐Blotcher, Elena
Mahmood, Rafat
Yang, Hannan
Li, Quefeng
Mazzella, Anthony J.
Lawrence Klein, Jeffrey
Bumgarner, Joseph
Gehi, Anil
author_sort Rosman, Lindsey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anger and extreme stress can trigger potentially fatal cardiovascular events in susceptible people. Political elections, such as the 2016 US presidential election, are significant stressors. Whether they can trigger cardiac arrhythmias is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective case‐crossover study, we linked cardiac device data, electronic health records, and historic voter registration records from 2436 patients with implanted cardiac devices. The incidence of arrhythmias during the election was compared with a control period with Poisson regression. We also tested for effect modification by demographics, comorbidities, political affiliation, and whether an individual's political affiliation was concordant with county‐level election results. Overall, 2592 arrhythmic events occurred in 655 patients during the hazard period compared with 1533 events in 472 patients during the control period. There was a significant increase in the incidence of composite outcomes for any arrhythmia (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.77 [95% CI, 1.42–2.21]), supraventricular arrhythmia (IRR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.36–2.43]), and ventricular arrhythmia (IRR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.22–2.10]) during the election relative to the control period. There was also an increase in specific types of arrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation (IRR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.06–2.11]), supraventricular tachycardia (IRR, 3.7 [95% CI, 2.2–6.2]), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (IRR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.3–2.2]), and daily atrial fibrillation burden (P<0.001). No significant interaction was found for sex, race/ethnicity, device type, age ≥65 years, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, political affiliation, or concordance between individual political affiliation and county‐level election results. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in cardiac arrhythmias during the 2016 US presidential election. These findings suggest that exposure to stressful sociopolitical events may trigger arrhythmogenesis in susceptible people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8483504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84835042021-10-06 Arrhythmia Risk During the 2016 US Presidential Election: The Cost of Stressful Politics Rosman, Lindsey Salmoirago‐Blotcher, Elena Mahmood, Rafat Yang, Hannan Li, Quefeng Mazzella, Anthony J. Lawrence Klein, Jeffrey Bumgarner, Joseph Gehi, Anil J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Anger and extreme stress can trigger potentially fatal cardiovascular events in susceptible people. Political elections, such as the 2016 US presidential election, are significant stressors. Whether they can trigger cardiac arrhythmias is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective case‐crossover study, we linked cardiac device data, electronic health records, and historic voter registration records from 2436 patients with implanted cardiac devices. The incidence of arrhythmias during the election was compared with a control period with Poisson regression. We also tested for effect modification by demographics, comorbidities, political affiliation, and whether an individual's political affiliation was concordant with county‐level election results. Overall, 2592 arrhythmic events occurred in 655 patients during the hazard period compared with 1533 events in 472 patients during the control period. There was a significant increase in the incidence of composite outcomes for any arrhythmia (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.77 [95% CI, 1.42–2.21]), supraventricular arrhythmia (IRR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.36–2.43]), and ventricular arrhythmia (IRR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.22–2.10]) during the election relative to the control period. There was also an increase in specific types of arrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation (IRR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.06–2.11]), supraventricular tachycardia (IRR, 3.7 [95% CI, 2.2–6.2]), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (IRR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.3–2.2]), and daily atrial fibrillation burden (P<0.001). No significant interaction was found for sex, race/ethnicity, device type, age ≥65 years, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, political affiliation, or concordance between individual political affiliation and county‐level election results. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in cardiac arrhythmias during the 2016 US presidential election. These findings suggest that exposure to stressful sociopolitical events may trigger arrhythmogenesis in susceptible people. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8483504/ /pubmed/34014121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020559 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rosman, Lindsey
Salmoirago‐Blotcher, Elena
Mahmood, Rafat
Yang, Hannan
Li, Quefeng
Mazzella, Anthony J.
Lawrence Klein, Jeffrey
Bumgarner, Joseph
Gehi, Anil
Arrhythmia Risk During the 2016 US Presidential Election: The Cost of Stressful Politics
title Arrhythmia Risk During the 2016 US Presidential Election: The Cost of Stressful Politics
title_full Arrhythmia Risk During the 2016 US Presidential Election: The Cost of Stressful Politics
title_fullStr Arrhythmia Risk During the 2016 US Presidential Election: The Cost of Stressful Politics
title_full_unstemmed Arrhythmia Risk During the 2016 US Presidential Election: The Cost of Stressful Politics
title_short Arrhythmia Risk During the 2016 US Presidential Election: The Cost of Stressful Politics
title_sort arrhythmia risk during the 2016 us presidential election: the cost of stressful politics
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020559
work_keys_str_mv AT rosmanlindsey arrhythmiariskduringthe2016uspresidentialelectionthecostofstressfulpolitics
AT salmoiragoblotcherelena arrhythmiariskduringthe2016uspresidentialelectionthecostofstressfulpolitics
AT mahmoodrafat arrhythmiariskduringthe2016uspresidentialelectionthecostofstressfulpolitics
AT yanghannan arrhythmiariskduringthe2016uspresidentialelectionthecostofstressfulpolitics
AT liquefeng arrhythmiariskduringthe2016uspresidentialelectionthecostofstressfulpolitics
AT mazzellaanthonyj arrhythmiariskduringthe2016uspresidentialelectionthecostofstressfulpolitics
AT lawrencekleinjeffrey arrhythmiariskduringthe2016uspresidentialelectionthecostofstressfulpolitics
AT bumgarnerjoseph arrhythmiariskduringthe2016uspresidentialelectionthecostofstressfulpolitics
AT gehianil arrhythmiariskduringthe2016uspresidentialelectionthecostofstressfulpolitics