Cargando…

Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation

OBJECTIVE: To answer the question if the freeze-all strategy and subsequent frozen embryo transfer is preferable to fresh embryo transfer for patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation (4 to 15 oocytes recovered) during in vitro fertilization treatments. METHODS: A retrospective cohort fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa, Podgaec, Sérgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644745
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6290
_version_ 1784577166149681152
author Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa
Podgaec, Sérgio
author_facet Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa
Podgaec, Sérgio
author_sort Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To answer the question if the freeze-all strategy and subsequent frozen embryo transfer is preferable to fresh embryo transfer for patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation (4 to 15 oocytes recovered) during in vitro fertilization treatments. METHODS: A retrospective cohort from two human reproduction centers between 2013 and 2017. A total of 471 frozen embryo transfers from freeze-all cycles, and 3,208 fresh transfers were included. RESULTS: After propensity score matching adjustment for age and number of eggs, 467 freeze-all cycles and 934 fresh cycles were analyzed, revealing no statistically significant difference between groups in relation to clinical pregnancy rate (32.5% in the Freeze-all Group and 32.3% in the Fresh Group, p=0.936). For women aged 40 years and older, we observed a statistically significant higher clinical pregnancy rate when freeze-all strategy was used (29.3% in the Freeze-all Group and 19.8% in the Fresh Group, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Freeze-all strategy was not superior to fresh transfer for all patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation. However, women aged 40 years and older could benefit from this strategy. This deserves further investigation in future research, preferable in a prospective randomized study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8483637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84836372021-10-01 Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa Podgaec, Sérgio Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To answer the question if the freeze-all strategy and subsequent frozen embryo transfer is preferable to fresh embryo transfer for patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation (4 to 15 oocytes recovered) during in vitro fertilization treatments. METHODS: A retrospective cohort from two human reproduction centers between 2013 and 2017. A total of 471 frozen embryo transfers from freeze-all cycles, and 3,208 fresh transfers were included. RESULTS: After propensity score matching adjustment for age and number of eggs, 467 freeze-all cycles and 934 fresh cycles were analyzed, revealing no statistically significant difference between groups in relation to clinical pregnancy rate (32.5% in the Freeze-all Group and 32.3% in the Fresh Group, p=0.936). For women aged 40 years and older, we observed a statistically significant higher clinical pregnancy rate when freeze-all strategy was used (29.3% in the Freeze-all Group and 19.8% in the Fresh Group, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Freeze-all strategy was not superior to fresh transfer for all patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation. However, women aged 40 years and older could benefit from this strategy. This deserves further investigation in future research, preferable in a prospective randomized study. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8483637/ /pubmed/34644745 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6290 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa
Podgaec, Sérgio
Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title_full Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title_fullStr Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title_short Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title_sort freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644745
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6290
work_keys_str_mv AT duartefilhooscarbarbosa freezeallpolicyforinvitrofertilizationinwomenwithnormalresponsetoovarianstimulation
AT podgaecsergio freezeallpolicyforinvitrofertilizationinwomenwithnormalresponsetoovarianstimulation