Cargando…

Pooling Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens to Improve Testing Capacity for SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time RT-PCR

BACKGROUND: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 using qRT-PCR with the pooling of samples can reduce workload and costs especially when the prevalence rate of COVID-19 in a population is low. To analyse the effect of pooling samples on the sensitivity of RT-qPCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Handous, Imene, Hannachi, Naila, Marzouk, Manel, Hazgui, Olfa, Bouafif Ep Ben Alaya, Nissaf, Boukadida, Jalel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-021-00156-6
_version_ 1784577178825916416
author Handous, Imene
Hannachi, Naila
Marzouk, Manel
Hazgui, Olfa
Bouafif Ep Ben Alaya, Nissaf
Boukadida, Jalel
author_facet Handous, Imene
Hannachi, Naila
Marzouk, Manel
Hazgui, Olfa
Bouafif Ep Ben Alaya, Nissaf
Boukadida, Jalel
author_sort Handous, Imene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 using qRT-PCR with the pooling of samples can reduce workload and costs especially when the prevalence rate of COVID-19 in a population is low. To analyse the effect of pooling samples on the sensitivity of RT-qPCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection, we compared the cycle threshold (Ct) values of pools of 5 and 10 that tested positive with Ct values of individual samples that tested positive in that pool. Twenty positive nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens with low to high viral load were selected and pooled individually with four and nine negative NP. RESULTS: In NP specimens, the sensitivity of pools of 5 and 10 were 90 and 85%, compared to individual sample testing, respectively. The RT-qPCR sensitivity of pools of 5 and 10 against individual testing were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Detection of positive samples with low Ct values (< 36) was consistently achieved in pools of 5 and 10. However, there were higher false negatives when samples with high ct values (> 36) were pooled and tested. The mean C(t) values obtained with the 5-sample pooled testing exceeded individual sample testing by 1.85 ± 1.09 cycles, while C(t) values obtained with the 10-sample pooling exceeded individual sample testing by 3.4 ± 1.65 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: In a low prevalence setting, testing capacity can be increased by pooling 5 or 10 samples, but the risk of additional false negatives needs to be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8483732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84837322021-10-01 Pooling Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens to Improve Testing Capacity for SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time RT-PCR Handous, Imene Hannachi, Naila Marzouk, Manel Hazgui, Olfa Bouafif Ep Ben Alaya, Nissaf Boukadida, Jalel Biol Proced Online Research BACKGROUND: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 using qRT-PCR with the pooling of samples can reduce workload and costs especially when the prevalence rate of COVID-19 in a population is low. To analyse the effect of pooling samples on the sensitivity of RT-qPCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection, we compared the cycle threshold (Ct) values of pools of 5 and 10 that tested positive with Ct values of individual samples that tested positive in that pool. Twenty positive nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens with low to high viral load were selected and pooled individually with four and nine negative NP. RESULTS: In NP specimens, the sensitivity of pools of 5 and 10 were 90 and 85%, compared to individual sample testing, respectively. The RT-qPCR sensitivity of pools of 5 and 10 against individual testing were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Detection of positive samples with low Ct values (< 36) was consistently achieved in pools of 5 and 10. However, there were higher false negatives when samples with high ct values (> 36) were pooled and tested. The mean C(t) values obtained with the 5-sample pooled testing exceeded individual sample testing by 1.85 ± 1.09 cycles, while C(t) values obtained with the 10-sample pooling exceeded individual sample testing by 3.4 ± 1.65 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: In a low prevalence setting, testing capacity can be increased by pooling 5 or 10 samples, but the risk of additional false negatives needs to be considered. BioMed Central 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8483732/ /pubmed/34592917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-021-00156-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Handous, Imene
Hannachi, Naila
Marzouk, Manel
Hazgui, Olfa
Bouafif Ep Ben Alaya, Nissaf
Boukadida, Jalel
Pooling Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens to Improve Testing Capacity for SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time RT-PCR
title Pooling Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens to Improve Testing Capacity for SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time RT-PCR
title_full Pooling Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens to Improve Testing Capacity for SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time RT-PCR
title_fullStr Pooling Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens to Improve Testing Capacity for SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time RT-PCR
title_full_unstemmed Pooling Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens to Improve Testing Capacity for SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time RT-PCR
title_short Pooling Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens to Improve Testing Capacity for SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time RT-PCR
title_sort pooling nasopharyngeal swab specimens to improve testing capacity for sars-cov-2 by real-time rt-pcr
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-021-00156-6
work_keys_str_mv AT handousimene poolingnasopharyngealswabspecimenstoimprovetestingcapacityforsarscov2byrealtimertpcr
AT hannachinaila poolingnasopharyngealswabspecimenstoimprovetestingcapacityforsarscov2byrealtimertpcr
AT marzoukmanel poolingnasopharyngealswabspecimenstoimprovetestingcapacityforsarscov2byrealtimertpcr
AT hazguiolfa poolingnasopharyngealswabspecimenstoimprovetestingcapacityforsarscov2byrealtimertpcr
AT bouafifepbenalayanissaf poolingnasopharyngealswabspecimenstoimprovetestingcapacityforsarscov2byrealtimertpcr
AT boukadidajalel poolingnasopharyngealswabspecimenstoimprovetestingcapacityforsarscov2byrealtimertpcr