Cargando…
Evaluation on curative effects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach for patients with lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis aims to conduct a systematic comparative study of the curative effects of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy (PETD) and Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy (PEID) when used to treat Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH). METHODS: The following...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34596110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027089 |
_version_ | 1784577202143100928 |
---|---|
author | Li, Rui Chen, Bo Shen, Weiwen Wang, Qing |
author_facet | Li, Rui Chen, Bo Shen, Weiwen Wang, Qing |
author_sort | Li, Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis aims to conduct a systematic comparative study of the curative effects of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy (PETD) and Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy (PEID) when used to treat Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH). METHODS: The following online databases will be searched to find articles related to treating of LDH using PETD and PEID, namely PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Database, and Web of Science. The search will include all articles published from inception until August 2021. Articles will be included according to the inclusion criteria. Two authors will independently screen and assess the quality of each study. RevMan (version 5.3) will be adopted to complete data analysis and evaluate the statistical significance of each operating technique in various outcomes. RESULTS: The present meta-analysis will evaluate the curative effects of using PETD and PEID to treat LDH patients. CONCLUSION: Compare the clinical efficiency of PETD and PEID as therapy for LDH with postoperative hypoesthesia, complications in surgical site wounds, nerve root injury, transfer to open surgery, recurrence, partial decompression, and other complications. The comparative analysis will help determine the difference between the 2 surgical methods of PETD and PEID for treating LDH. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: August 2, 2021.osf.io/hr964. (https://osf.io/hr964/) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8483854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84838542021-10-04 Evaluation on curative effects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach for patients with lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Rui Chen, Bo Shen, Weiwen Wang, Qing Medicine (Baltimore) 4200 BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis aims to conduct a systematic comparative study of the curative effects of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy (PETD) and Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy (PEID) when used to treat Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH). METHODS: The following online databases will be searched to find articles related to treating of LDH using PETD and PEID, namely PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Database, and Web of Science. The search will include all articles published from inception until August 2021. Articles will be included according to the inclusion criteria. Two authors will independently screen and assess the quality of each study. RevMan (version 5.3) will be adopted to complete data analysis and evaluate the statistical significance of each operating technique in various outcomes. RESULTS: The present meta-analysis will evaluate the curative effects of using PETD and PEID to treat LDH patients. CONCLUSION: Compare the clinical efficiency of PETD and PEID as therapy for LDH with postoperative hypoesthesia, complications in surgical site wounds, nerve root injury, transfer to open surgery, recurrence, partial decompression, and other complications. The comparative analysis will help determine the difference between the 2 surgical methods of PETD and PEID for treating LDH. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: August 2, 2021.osf.io/hr964. (https://osf.io/hr964/) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8483854/ /pubmed/34596110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027089 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 4200 Li, Rui Chen, Bo Shen, Weiwen Wang, Qing Evaluation on curative effects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach for patients with lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Evaluation on curative effects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach for patients with lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Evaluation on curative effects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach for patients with lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation on curative effects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach for patients with lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation on curative effects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach for patients with lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Evaluation on curative effects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach for patients with lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | evaluation on curative effects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach for patients with lumbar disc herniation: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 4200 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34596110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lirui evaluationoncurativeeffectsofpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyviaatransforaminalapproachversusaninterlaminarapproachforpatientswithlumbardischerniationaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenbo evaluationoncurativeeffectsofpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyviaatransforaminalapproachversusaninterlaminarapproachforpatientswithlumbardischerniationaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenweiwen evaluationoncurativeeffectsofpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyviaatransforaminalapproachversusaninterlaminarapproachforpatientswithlumbardischerniationaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangqing evaluationoncurativeeffectsofpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyviaatransforaminalapproachversusaninterlaminarapproachforpatientswithlumbardischerniationaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |