Cargando…
A New Quantitative Classification of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Related to Cystic Duct Implantation
BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding biliary anatomy and its variations, including the cystic duct (CD), is important in the pre-surgical setting and for predicting biliary diseases. However, no large series has focused on CD evaluation using a quantitative analysis. The primary aim of this prospective s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04852-8 |
_version_ | 1784577253323046912 |
---|---|
author | Renzulli, Matteo Brocchi, Stefano Marasco, Giovanni Spinelli, Daniele Balacchi, Caterina Barakat, Massimo Pettinari, Irene Golfieri, Rita |
author_facet | Renzulli, Matteo Brocchi, Stefano Marasco, Giovanni Spinelli, Daniele Balacchi, Caterina Barakat, Massimo Pettinari, Irene Golfieri, Rita |
author_sort | Renzulli, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding biliary anatomy and its variations, including the cystic duct (CD), is important in the pre-surgical setting and for predicting biliary diseases. However, no large series has focused on CD evaluation using a quantitative analysis. The primary aim of this prospective study was to create a ‘taxonomic’ classification of CD anatomy in a large cohort of subjects who underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). The secondary aim was to evaluate the correlations between extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) variants and biliary diseases. METHODS: We enrolled patients who underwent MRCP for different clinical indications from January 2017 to May 2019. Demographical, anatomical and clinical data were evaluated using statistical analyses, as appropriate. The anatomical assessment of EHBD was performed using the standard classification for CD in low, medium, and high insertions, and the lengths of CD to the duodenal papilla (DP), and EHBD was determined to conduct a new quantitative analysis. RESULTS: The final study population comprised 1004 subjects. A new classification for EHBD as per the percentile distribution of the ratio CDDP/EHBD was designed, and the following categories were obtained: type 1 (below the 25th percentile) for CDDP/EHBD ratio ≤ 50%; type 2 (25th to 75th percentile) for CDDP/EHBD ratio 51–75% and type 3 (above the 75th percentiles) for CDDP/EHBD ratio > 75%. Type 1 of the new classification of CD implantation was significantly superior in terms of the detection of low, medial and intra-pancreatic CD that was significantly correlated with a high risk of choledochal lithiasis in comparison with the standard classification (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The new classification of CD implantation enables identification of the vast majority of intra-pancreatic CDs that are correlated with a high risk of choledochal lithiasis in a single category (type 1) that is easy to identify using imaging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11605-020-04852-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8484130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84841302021-10-08 A New Quantitative Classification of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Related to Cystic Duct Implantation Renzulli, Matteo Brocchi, Stefano Marasco, Giovanni Spinelli, Daniele Balacchi, Caterina Barakat, Massimo Pettinari, Irene Golfieri, Rita J Gastrointest Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding biliary anatomy and its variations, including the cystic duct (CD), is important in the pre-surgical setting and for predicting biliary diseases. However, no large series has focused on CD evaluation using a quantitative analysis. The primary aim of this prospective study was to create a ‘taxonomic’ classification of CD anatomy in a large cohort of subjects who underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). The secondary aim was to evaluate the correlations between extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) variants and biliary diseases. METHODS: We enrolled patients who underwent MRCP for different clinical indications from January 2017 to May 2019. Demographical, anatomical and clinical data were evaluated using statistical analyses, as appropriate. The anatomical assessment of EHBD was performed using the standard classification for CD in low, medium, and high insertions, and the lengths of CD to the duodenal papilla (DP), and EHBD was determined to conduct a new quantitative analysis. RESULTS: The final study population comprised 1004 subjects. A new classification for EHBD as per the percentile distribution of the ratio CDDP/EHBD was designed, and the following categories were obtained: type 1 (below the 25th percentile) for CDDP/EHBD ratio ≤ 50%; type 2 (25th to 75th percentile) for CDDP/EHBD ratio 51–75% and type 3 (above the 75th percentiles) for CDDP/EHBD ratio > 75%. Type 1 of the new classification of CD implantation was significantly superior in terms of the detection of low, medial and intra-pancreatic CD that was significantly correlated with a high risk of choledochal lithiasis in comparison with the standard classification (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The new classification of CD implantation enables identification of the vast majority of intra-pancreatic CDs that are correlated with a high risk of choledochal lithiasis in a single category (type 1) that is easy to identify using imaging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11605-020-04852-8. Springer US 2020-12-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8484130/ /pubmed/33269458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04852-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Renzulli, Matteo Brocchi, Stefano Marasco, Giovanni Spinelli, Daniele Balacchi, Caterina Barakat, Massimo Pettinari, Irene Golfieri, Rita A New Quantitative Classification of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Related to Cystic Duct Implantation |
title | A New Quantitative Classification of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Related to Cystic Duct Implantation |
title_full | A New Quantitative Classification of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Related to Cystic Duct Implantation |
title_fullStr | A New Quantitative Classification of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Related to Cystic Duct Implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Quantitative Classification of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Related to Cystic Duct Implantation |
title_short | A New Quantitative Classification of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Related to Cystic Duct Implantation |
title_sort | new quantitative classification of the extrahepatic biliary tract related to cystic duct implantation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04852-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renzullimatteo anewquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT brocchistefano anewquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT marascogiovanni anewquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT spinellidaniele anewquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT balacchicaterina anewquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT barakatmassimo anewquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT pettinariirene anewquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT golfieririta anewquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT renzullimatteo newquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT brocchistefano newquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT marascogiovanni newquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT spinellidaniele newquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT balacchicaterina newquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT barakatmassimo newquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT pettinariirene newquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation AT golfieririta newquantitativeclassificationoftheextrahepaticbiliarytractrelatedtocysticductimplantation |