Cargando…
Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches)
The recent introduction of various high-dimensional modeling methods, such as radiomics and deep learning, has created a much greater diversity in modeling approaches for survival prediction (or, more generally, time-to-event prediction). The newness of the recent modeling approaches and unfamiliari...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0223 |
_version_ | 1784577258163273728 |
---|---|
author | Park, Seo Young Park, Ji Eun Kim, Hyungjin Park, Seong Ho |
author_facet | Park, Seo Young Park, Ji Eun Kim, Hyungjin Park, Seong Ho |
author_sort | Park, Seo Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | The recent introduction of various high-dimensional modeling methods, such as radiomics and deep learning, has created a much greater diversity in modeling approaches for survival prediction (or, more generally, time-to-event prediction). The newness of the recent modeling approaches and unfamiliarity with the model outputs may confuse some researchers and practitioners about the evaluation of the performance of such models. Methodological literacy to critically appraise the performance evaluation of the models and, ideally, the ability to conduct such an evaluation would be needed for those who want to develop models or apply them in practice. This article intends to provide intuitive, conceptual, and practical explanations of the statistical methods for evaluating the performance of survival prediction models with minimal usage of mathematical descriptions. It covers from conventional to deep learning methods, and emphasis has been placed on recent modeling approaches. This review article includes straightforward explanations of C indices (Harrell's C index, etc.), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, calibration plot, other methods for evaluating the calibration performance, and Brier score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8484151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84841512021-10-01 Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches) Park, Seo Young Park, Ji Eun Kim, Hyungjin Park, Seong Ho Korean J Radiol Technology, Experiment, and Physics The recent introduction of various high-dimensional modeling methods, such as radiomics and deep learning, has created a much greater diversity in modeling approaches for survival prediction (or, more generally, time-to-event prediction). The newness of the recent modeling approaches and unfamiliarity with the model outputs may confuse some researchers and practitioners about the evaluation of the performance of such models. Methodological literacy to critically appraise the performance evaluation of the models and, ideally, the ability to conduct such an evaluation would be needed for those who want to develop models or apply them in practice. This article intends to provide intuitive, conceptual, and practical explanations of the statistical methods for evaluating the performance of survival prediction models with minimal usage of mathematical descriptions. It covers from conventional to deep learning methods, and emphasis has been placed on recent modeling approaches. This review article includes straightforward explanations of C indices (Harrell's C index, etc.), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, calibration plot, other methods for evaluating the calibration performance, and Brier score. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-10 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8484151/ /pubmed/34269532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0223 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technology, Experiment, and Physics Park, Seo Young Park, Ji Eun Kim, Hyungjin Park, Seong Ho Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches) |
title | Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches) |
title_full | Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches) |
title_fullStr | Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches) |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches) |
title_short | Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches) |
title_sort | review of statistical methods for evaluating the performance of survival or other time-to-event prediction models (from conventional to deep learning approaches) |
topic | Technology, Experiment, and Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkseoyoung reviewofstatisticalmethodsforevaluatingtheperformanceofsurvivalorothertimetoeventpredictionmodelsfromconventionaltodeeplearningapproaches AT parkjieun reviewofstatisticalmethodsforevaluatingtheperformanceofsurvivalorothertimetoeventpredictionmodelsfromconventionaltodeeplearningapproaches AT kimhyungjin reviewofstatisticalmethodsforevaluatingtheperformanceofsurvivalorothertimetoeventpredictionmodelsfromconventionaltodeeplearningapproaches AT parkseongho reviewofstatisticalmethodsforevaluatingtheperformanceofsurvivalorothertimetoeventpredictionmodelsfromconventionaltodeeplearningapproaches |