Cargando…

Klinische Umsetzbarkeit der kognitiven Screeningbatterie BICAMS bei Patienten mit Multipler Sklerose: Ergebnisse der Machbarkeitsstudie in Deutschland

BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from cognitive impairment in 40–70% of the cases. There is evidence that the cognitive status is predictive for working ability and early retirement. Regular assessment of cognitive functionality is therefore urgently needed. PURPOSE: The Germ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penner, Iris-Katharina, Filser, Melanie, Bätge, Sharon Jean, Renner, Alina, Ullrich, Sebastian, Lassek, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-021-01073-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from cognitive impairment in 40–70% of the cases. There is evidence that the cognitive status is predictive for working ability and early retirement. Regular assessment of cognitive functionality is therefore urgently needed. PURPOSE: The German validation of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) battery was evaluated in a multicentric way with respect to its feasibility in private neurological centers across Germany. METHODS: Physician assistants were trained with respect to application and scoring of BICAMS. All scored test materials were evaluated by independent neuropsychological experts. RESULTS: A total of 1606 BICAMS datasets were collected from 65 neurological centers. Of these 1573 datasets were analyzed of which 49.7% were correctly applied and scored while mistakes in application, scoring and transformation were found in 50.3%. Interrater reliability for each subtest was found to be ICC [Formula: see text] 0.953 when datasets containing mistakes were excluded. DISCUSSION: In general, BICAMS is highly recommended to be applied in standard clinical care; however, it should be emphasized that although the interrater reliability in the final sample was high, serious mistakes were found in 50.3% of cases. From these findings we conclude that nonpsychological staff have to be even more intensively trained and supervised by experts in the application and scoring of BICAMS.