Cargando…
Klinische Umsetzbarkeit der kognitiven Screeningbatterie BICAMS bei Patienten mit Multipler Sklerose: Ergebnisse der Machbarkeitsstudie in Deutschland
BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from cognitive impairment in 40–70% of the cases. There is evidence that the cognitive status is predictive for working ability and early retirement. Regular assessment of cognitive functionality is therefore urgently needed. PURPOSE: The Germ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-021-01073-5 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from cognitive impairment in 40–70% of the cases. There is evidence that the cognitive status is predictive for working ability and early retirement. Regular assessment of cognitive functionality is therefore urgently needed. PURPOSE: The German validation of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) battery was evaluated in a multicentric way with respect to its feasibility in private neurological centers across Germany. METHODS: Physician assistants were trained with respect to application and scoring of BICAMS. All scored test materials were evaluated by independent neuropsychological experts. RESULTS: A total of 1606 BICAMS datasets were collected from 65 neurological centers. Of these 1573 datasets were analyzed of which 49.7% were correctly applied and scored while mistakes in application, scoring and transformation were found in 50.3%. Interrater reliability for each subtest was found to be ICC [Formula: see text] 0.953 when datasets containing mistakes were excluded. DISCUSSION: In general, BICAMS is highly recommended to be applied in standard clinical care; however, it should be emphasized that although the interrater reliability in the final sample was high, serious mistakes were found in 50.3% of cases. From these findings we conclude that nonpsychological staff have to be even more intensively trained and supervised by experts in the application and scoring of BICAMS. |
---|