Cargando…

The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler

BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a circular stapled anastomosis, the optimal diameter of the used circular stapler to restore continuity is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the 25 mm stapled versus the 28 mm stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tagkalos, E., van der Sluis, P. C., Uzun, E., Berlth, F., Staubitz, J., Gockel, I., van Hillegersberg, R., Lang, H., Grimminger, Peter P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04895-x
_version_ 1784577262598750208
author Tagkalos, E.
van der Sluis, P. C.
Uzun, E.
Berlth, F.
Staubitz, J.
Gockel, I.
van Hillegersberg, R.
Lang, H.
Grimminger, Peter P.
author_facet Tagkalos, E.
van der Sluis, P. C.
Uzun, E.
Berlth, F.
Staubitz, J.
Gockel, I.
van Hillegersberg, R.
Lang, H.
Grimminger, Peter P.
author_sort Tagkalos, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a circular stapled anastomosis, the optimal diameter of the used circular stapler to restore continuity is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the 25 mm stapled versus the 28 mm stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, focusing on anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic strictures. METHODS: Between February 2008 and June 2019, 349 consecutive patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction and circular stapled anastomosis. Patient characteristics and postoperative results, such as anastomotic insufficiency rates, postoperative anastomotic stricture rates, time to anastomotic stricture rate, and the number of dilatations, were recorded in a prospective database and analyzed. RESULTS: In 222 patients (64%), the 25 mm circular stapler was used and in 127 patients (36%) the 28 mm circular stapler was used. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Anastomotic insufficiency rates were comparable between the 25 mm (12%) and the 28 mm groups (11%) (p = 0.751). There were no differences between postoperative anastomotic strictures in the 25 mm (14%) and the 28 mm groups (14%) (p = 0.863). Within patients with postoperative anastomotic strictures, a median number of 2 dilatations were observed in each group (p = 0.573) without differences in the time to first diagnosis (p = 0.412). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic stricture rates between the 25 mm and the 28 mm circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Both the 25 mm and 28 mm stapler can be safely used to create a circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis to restore continuity after esophagectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8484169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84841692021-10-08 The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler Tagkalos, E. van der Sluis, P. C. Uzun, E. Berlth, F. Staubitz, J. Gockel, I. van Hillegersberg, R. Lang, H. Grimminger, Peter P. J Gastrointest Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a circular stapled anastomosis, the optimal diameter of the used circular stapler to restore continuity is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the 25 mm stapled versus the 28 mm stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, focusing on anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic strictures. METHODS: Between February 2008 and June 2019, 349 consecutive patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction and circular stapled anastomosis. Patient characteristics and postoperative results, such as anastomotic insufficiency rates, postoperative anastomotic stricture rates, time to anastomotic stricture rate, and the number of dilatations, were recorded in a prospective database and analyzed. RESULTS: In 222 patients (64%), the 25 mm circular stapler was used and in 127 patients (36%) the 28 mm circular stapler was used. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Anastomotic insufficiency rates were comparable between the 25 mm (12%) and the 28 mm groups (11%) (p = 0.751). There were no differences between postoperative anastomotic strictures in the 25 mm (14%) and the 28 mm groups (14%) (p = 0.863). Within patients with postoperative anastomotic strictures, a median number of 2 dilatations were observed in each group (p = 0.573) without differences in the time to first diagnosis (p = 0.412). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic stricture rates between the 25 mm and the 28 mm circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Both the 25 mm and 28 mm stapler can be safely used to create a circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis to restore continuity after esophagectomy. Springer US 2021-01-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8484169/ /pubmed/33506342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04895-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Tagkalos, E.
van der Sluis, P. C.
Uzun, E.
Berlth, F.
Staubitz, J.
Gockel, I.
van Hillegersberg, R.
Lang, H.
Grimminger, Peter P.
The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler
title The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler
title_full The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler
title_fullStr The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler
title_full_unstemmed The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler
title_short The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler
title_sort circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis in esophagectomy: no differences in anastomotic insufficiency and stricture rates between the 25 mm and 28 mm circular stapler
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04895-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tagkalose thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT vandersluispc thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT uzune thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT berlthf thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT staubitzj thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT gockeli thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT vanhillegersbergr thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT langh thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT grimmingerpeterp thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT tagkalose circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT vandersluispc circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT uzune circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT berlthf circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT staubitzj circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT gockeli circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT vanhillegersbergr circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT langh circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler
AT grimmingerpeterp circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler