Cargando…
The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler
BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a circular stapled anastomosis, the optimal diameter of the used circular stapler to restore continuity is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the 25 mm stapled versus the 28 mm stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after I...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04895-x |
_version_ | 1784577262598750208 |
---|---|
author | Tagkalos, E. van der Sluis, P. C. Uzun, E. Berlth, F. Staubitz, J. Gockel, I. van Hillegersberg, R. Lang, H. Grimminger, Peter P. |
author_facet | Tagkalos, E. van der Sluis, P. C. Uzun, E. Berlth, F. Staubitz, J. Gockel, I. van Hillegersberg, R. Lang, H. Grimminger, Peter P. |
author_sort | Tagkalos, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a circular stapled anastomosis, the optimal diameter of the used circular stapler to restore continuity is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the 25 mm stapled versus the 28 mm stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, focusing on anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic strictures. METHODS: Between February 2008 and June 2019, 349 consecutive patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction and circular stapled anastomosis. Patient characteristics and postoperative results, such as anastomotic insufficiency rates, postoperative anastomotic stricture rates, time to anastomotic stricture rate, and the number of dilatations, were recorded in a prospective database and analyzed. RESULTS: In 222 patients (64%), the 25 mm circular stapler was used and in 127 patients (36%) the 28 mm circular stapler was used. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Anastomotic insufficiency rates were comparable between the 25 mm (12%) and the 28 mm groups (11%) (p = 0.751). There were no differences between postoperative anastomotic strictures in the 25 mm (14%) and the 28 mm groups (14%) (p = 0.863). Within patients with postoperative anastomotic strictures, a median number of 2 dilatations were observed in each group (p = 0.573) without differences in the time to first diagnosis (p = 0.412). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic stricture rates between the 25 mm and the 28 mm circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Both the 25 mm and 28 mm stapler can be safely used to create a circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis to restore continuity after esophagectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8484169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84841692021-10-08 The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler Tagkalos, E. van der Sluis, P. C. Uzun, E. Berlth, F. Staubitz, J. Gockel, I. van Hillegersberg, R. Lang, H. Grimminger, Peter P. J Gastrointest Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a circular stapled anastomosis, the optimal diameter of the used circular stapler to restore continuity is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the 25 mm stapled versus the 28 mm stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, focusing on anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic strictures. METHODS: Between February 2008 and June 2019, 349 consecutive patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction and circular stapled anastomosis. Patient characteristics and postoperative results, such as anastomotic insufficiency rates, postoperative anastomotic stricture rates, time to anastomotic stricture rate, and the number of dilatations, were recorded in a prospective database and analyzed. RESULTS: In 222 patients (64%), the 25 mm circular stapler was used and in 127 patients (36%) the 28 mm circular stapler was used. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Anastomotic insufficiency rates were comparable between the 25 mm (12%) and the 28 mm groups (11%) (p = 0.751). There were no differences between postoperative anastomotic strictures in the 25 mm (14%) and the 28 mm groups (14%) (p = 0.863). Within patients with postoperative anastomotic strictures, a median number of 2 dilatations were observed in each group (p = 0.573) without differences in the time to first diagnosis (p = 0.412). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic stricture rates between the 25 mm and the 28 mm circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Both the 25 mm and 28 mm stapler can be safely used to create a circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis to restore continuity after esophagectomy. Springer US 2021-01-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8484169/ /pubmed/33506342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04895-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tagkalos, E. van der Sluis, P. C. Uzun, E. Berlth, F. Staubitz, J. Gockel, I. van Hillegersberg, R. Lang, H. Grimminger, Peter P. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler |
title | The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler |
title_full | The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler |
title_fullStr | The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler |
title_full_unstemmed | The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler |
title_short | The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler |
title_sort | circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis in esophagectomy: no differences in anastomotic insufficiency and stricture rates between the 25 mm and 28 mm circular stapler |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04895-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tagkalose thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT vandersluispc thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT uzune thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT berlthf thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT staubitzj thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT gockeli thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT vanhillegersbergr thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT langh thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT grimmingerpeterp thecircularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT tagkalose circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT vandersluispc circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT uzune circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT berlthf circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT staubitzj circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT gockeli circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT vanhillegersbergr circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT langh circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler AT grimmingerpeterp circularstapledesophagogastricanastomosisinesophagectomynodifferencesinanastomoticinsufficiencyandstrictureratesbetweenthe25mmand28mmcircularstapler |