Cargando…

To 1000 Gy and back again: a systematic review on dose-response evaluation in selective internal radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver cancer

PURPOSE: To systematically review all current evidence into the dose-response relation of yttrium-90 and holmium-166 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in primary and secondary liver cancer. METHODS: A standardized search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roosen, Joey, Klaassen, Nienke J. M., Westlund Gotby, Lovisa E. L., Overduin, Christiaan G., Verheij, Marcel, Konijnenberg, Mark W., Nijsen, J. Frank W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33839892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05340-0
_version_ 1784577273463046144
author Roosen, Joey
Klaassen, Nienke J. M.
Westlund Gotby, Lovisa E. L.
Overduin, Christiaan G.
Verheij, Marcel
Konijnenberg, Mark W.
Nijsen, J. Frank W.
author_facet Roosen, Joey
Klaassen, Nienke J. M.
Westlund Gotby, Lovisa E. L.
Overduin, Christiaan G.
Verheij, Marcel
Konijnenberg, Mark W.
Nijsen, J. Frank W.
author_sort Roosen, Joey
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To systematically review all current evidence into the dose-response relation of yttrium-90 and holmium-166 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in primary and secondary liver cancer. METHODS: A standardized search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library in order to identify all published articles on dose-response evaluation in SIRT. In order to limit the results, all articles that investigated SIRT in combination with other therapy modalities (such as chemotherapy) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 3038 records were identified of which 487 were screened based on the full text. Ultimately, 37 studies were included for narrative analysis. Meta-analysis could not be performed due to the large heterogeneity in study and reporting designs. Out of 37 studies, 30 reported a ‘mean dose threshold’ that needs to be achieved in order to expect a response. This threshold appears to be higher for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 100–250 Gy) than for colorectal cancer metastases (CRC, 40–60 Gy). Reported thresholds tend to be lower for resin microspheres than when glass microspheres are used. CONCLUSION: Although the existing evidence demonstrates a dose-response relationship in SIRT for both primary liver tumours and liver metastases, many pieces of the puzzle are still missing, hampering the definition of standardized dose thresholds. Nonetheless, most current evidence points towards a target mean dose of 100–250 Gy for HCC and 40–60 Gy for CRC. The field would greatly benefit from a reporting standard and prospective studies designed to elucidate the dose-response relation in different tumour types. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05340-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8484215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84842152021-10-04 To 1000 Gy and back again: a systematic review on dose-response evaluation in selective internal radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver cancer Roosen, Joey Klaassen, Nienke J. M. Westlund Gotby, Lovisa E. L. Overduin, Christiaan G. Verheij, Marcel Konijnenberg, Mark W. Nijsen, J. Frank W. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Review Article PURPOSE: To systematically review all current evidence into the dose-response relation of yttrium-90 and holmium-166 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in primary and secondary liver cancer. METHODS: A standardized search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library in order to identify all published articles on dose-response evaluation in SIRT. In order to limit the results, all articles that investigated SIRT in combination with other therapy modalities (such as chemotherapy) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 3038 records were identified of which 487 were screened based on the full text. Ultimately, 37 studies were included for narrative analysis. Meta-analysis could not be performed due to the large heterogeneity in study and reporting designs. Out of 37 studies, 30 reported a ‘mean dose threshold’ that needs to be achieved in order to expect a response. This threshold appears to be higher for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 100–250 Gy) than for colorectal cancer metastases (CRC, 40–60 Gy). Reported thresholds tend to be lower for resin microspheres than when glass microspheres are used. CONCLUSION: Although the existing evidence demonstrates a dose-response relationship in SIRT for both primary liver tumours and liver metastases, many pieces of the puzzle are still missing, hampering the definition of standardized dose thresholds. Nonetheless, most current evidence points towards a target mean dose of 100–250 Gy for HCC and 40–60 Gy for CRC. The field would greatly benefit from a reporting standard and prospective studies designed to elucidate the dose-response relation in different tumour types. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05340-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8484215/ /pubmed/33839892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05340-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Roosen, Joey
Klaassen, Nienke J. M.
Westlund Gotby, Lovisa E. L.
Overduin, Christiaan G.
Verheij, Marcel
Konijnenberg, Mark W.
Nijsen, J. Frank W.
To 1000 Gy and back again: a systematic review on dose-response evaluation in selective internal radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver cancer
title To 1000 Gy and back again: a systematic review on dose-response evaluation in selective internal radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver cancer
title_full To 1000 Gy and back again: a systematic review on dose-response evaluation in selective internal radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver cancer
title_fullStr To 1000 Gy and back again: a systematic review on dose-response evaluation in selective internal radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver cancer
title_full_unstemmed To 1000 Gy and back again: a systematic review on dose-response evaluation in selective internal radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver cancer
title_short To 1000 Gy and back again: a systematic review on dose-response evaluation in selective internal radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver cancer
title_sort to 1000 gy and back again: a systematic review on dose-response evaluation in selective internal radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver cancer
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33839892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05340-0
work_keys_str_mv AT roosenjoey to1000gyandbackagainasystematicreviewondoseresponseevaluationinselectiveinternalradiationtherapyforprimaryandsecondarylivercancer
AT klaassennienkejm to1000gyandbackagainasystematicreviewondoseresponseevaluationinselectiveinternalradiationtherapyforprimaryandsecondarylivercancer
AT westlundgotbylovisael to1000gyandbackagainasystematicreviewondoseresponseevaluationinselectiveinternalradiationtherapyforprimaryandsecondarylivercancer
AT overduinchristiaang to1000gyandbackagainasystematicreviewondoseresponseevaluationinselectiveinternalradiationtherapyforprimaryandsecondarylivercancer
AT verheijmarcel to1000gyandbackagainasystematicreviewondoseresponseevaluationinselectiveinternalradiationtherapyforprimaryandsecondarylivercancer
AT konijnenbergmarkw to1000gyandbackagainasystematicreviewondoseresponseevaluationinselectiveinternalradiationtherapyforprimaryandsecondarylivercancer
AT nijsenjfrankw to1000gyandbackagainasystematicreviewondoseresponseevaluationinselectiveinternalradiationtherapyforprimaryandsecondarylivercancer