Cargando…
Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany
BACKGROUND: Disease management programs (DMPs) were set up in Germany in 2003 to improve outpatient care of chronically ill patients. The present study looks at the attitudes and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in relation to DMPs, how they rate them almost 20 years after their introducti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34338907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-021-00867-1 |
_version_ | 1784577275746844672 |
---|---|
author | Wangler, Julian Jansky, Michael |
author_facet | Wangler, Julian Jansky, Michael |
author_sort | Wangler, Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Disease management programs (DMPs) were set up in Germany in 2003 to improve outpatient care of chronically ill patients. The present study looks at the attitudes and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in relation to DMPs, how they rate them almost 20 years after their introduction and where they see a need for improvement. METHODS: A total of 1504 GPs in the Federal States of Rhineland Palatinate, Saarland and Hesse were surveyed between December 2019 and March 2020 using a written questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 58% of respondents rate DMPs positively and regard them as making a useful contribution to primary care. The guarantee of regular, structured patient care and greater compliance are regarded as particularly positive aspects. It was also established that diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge was expanded through participation in DMPs. 57% essentially follow the DMP recommendations for (drug) treatment. Despite positive experiences of DMPs in patient care, the GPs surveyed mention various challenges (documentation requirements, frequent changes to the programmes, inflexibility). Univariant linear regression analysis revealed factors influencing the satisfaction with DMPs, such as improvement of compliance and clearly defined procedures in medical care. CONCLUSION: Most of the GPs surveyed consider the combination of continuous patient care and evidence-based diagnosis and treatment to be a great advantage. To better adapt DMPs to the conditions of primary care, it makes sense to simplify the documentation requirements, to regulate cooperation with other healthcare levels more clearly and to give GPs more decision-making flexibility. Increased inclusion of GP experience in the process of developing and refining DMPs can be helpful. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10354-021-00867-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8484225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84842252021-10-04 Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany Wangler, Julian Jansky, Michael Wien Med Wochenschr Original Article BACKGROUND: Disease management programs (DMPs) were set up in Germany in 2003 to improve outpatient care of chronically ill patients. The present study looks at the attitudes and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in relation to DMPs, how they rate them almost 20 years after their introduction and where they see a need for improvement. METHODS: A total of 1504 GPs in the Federal States of Rhineland Palatinate, Saarland and Hesse were surveyed between December 2019 and March 2020 using a written questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 58% of respondents rate DMPs positively and regard them as making a useful contribution to primary care. The guarantee of regular, structured patient care and greater compliance are regarded as particularly positive aspects. It was also established that diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge was expanded through participation in DMPs. 57% essentially follow the DMP recommendations for (drug) treatment. Despite positive experiences of DMPs in patient care, the GPs surveyed mention various challenges (documentation requirements, frequent changes to the programmes, inflexibility). Univariant linear regression analysis revealed factors influencing the satisfaction with DMPs, such as improvement of compliance and clearly defined procedures in medical care. CONCLUSION: Most of the GPs surveyed consider the combination of continuous patient care and evidence-based diagnosis and treatment to be a great advantage. To better adapt DMPs to the conditions of primary care, it makes sense to simplify the documentation requirements, to regulate cooperation with other healthcare levels more clearly and to give GPs more decision-making flexibility. Increased inclusion of GP experience in the process of developing and refining DMPs can be helpful. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10354-021-00867-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2021-08-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8484225/ /pubmed/34338907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-021-00867-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wangler, Julian Jansky, Michael Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany |
title | Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany |
title_full | Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany |
title_fullStr | Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany |
title_short | Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany |
title_sort | attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in germany |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34338907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-021-00867-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanglerjulian attitudestoandexperienceofdiseasemanagementprogramsinprimarycareanexploratorysurveyofgeneralpractitionersingermany AT janskymichael attitudestoandexperienceofdiseasemanagementprogramsinprimarycareanexploratorysurveyofgeneralpractitionersingermany |