Cargando…

What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?: Results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in Germany

Medical guidelines aim to ensure that care processes take place in an evidence-based and structured manner. They are especially relevant in outpatient primary care due to the wide range of symptoms and clinical pictures. In German-speaking countries, there is a lack of current findings documenting g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wangler, Julian, Jansky, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-021-00849-3
_version_ 1784577280099483648
author Wangler, Julian
Jansky, Michael
author_facet Wangler, Julian
Jansky, Michael
author_sort Wangler, Julian
collection PubMed
description Medical guidelines aim to ensure that care processes take place in an evidence-based and structured manner. They are especially relevant in outpatient primary care due to the wide range of symptoms and clinical pictures. In German-speaking countries, there is a lack of current findings documenting general practitioners’ opinions and experiences regarding guidelines, their expectations and their views on what improvements could be made to increase the use of this type of evidence-based instrument in the primary care setting. Between April and August 2020, a total of 3098 general practitioners were surveyed in the states of Baden–Württemberg, Hesse and Rhineland–Palatinate via an online questionnaire. Alongside the descriptive evaluation, t‑testing was used to determine significant differences between two independent sampling groups. A factor analysis was also used to cluster the expectations of those surveyed regarding the fulfilment of requirements relating to guidelines. A total of 52% of those surveyed have a positive view of guidelines. Overall, guidelines are associated with an increased evidence-based approach (69%), standardisation of diagnosis and treatment (62%) and a reduction in overprovision or underprovision of care (57%). In all, 62% of the physicians who implemented guidelines observed positive effects on the quality of care provided, and 67% reported that the implementation of guidelines improved the quality of their diagnostic or therapeutic skills. However, implementation is often seen as being complicated (43%) and restricting the physician’s ability to act independently (63%). Survey participants suggested that guidelines could be optimised by giving greater consideration to nondrug alternatives (46%), focusing on issues related to quality of life (42%) and offering a comparative assessment of various treatment options (39%). In order to further promote the attractiveness of guidelines for primary care the design of guidelines should be oriented more towards their application; they should be well-presented to make them easier to implement. The scope of action available to the physician should be stressed. The guidelines should provide recommendations on opportunities for the delegation of tasks within practice teams. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10354-021-00849-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8484242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84842422021-10-04 What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?: Results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in Germany Wangler, Julian Jansky, Michael Wien Med Wochenschr Original Article Medical guidelines aim to ensure that care processes take place in an evidence-based and structured manner. They are especially relevant in outpatient primary care due to the wide range of symptoms and clinical pictures. In German-speaking countries, there is a lack of current findings documenting general practitioners’ opinions and experiences regarding guidelines, their expectations and their views on what improvements could be made to increase the use of this type of evidence-based instrument in the primary care setting. Between April and August 2020, a total of 3098 general practitioners were surveyed in the states of Baden–Württemberg, Hesse and Rhineland–Palatinate via an online questionnaire. Alongside the descriptive evaluation, t‑testing was used to determine significant differences between two independent sampling groups. A factor analysis was also used to cluster the expectations of those surveyed regarding the fulfilment of requirements relating to guidelines. A total of 52% of those surveyed have a positive view of guidelines. Overall, guidelines are associated with an increased evidence-based approach (69%), standardisation of diagnosis and treatment (62%) and a reduction in overprovision or underprovision of care (57%). In all, 62% of the physicians who implemented guidelines observed positive effects on the quality of care provided, and 67% reported that the implementation of guidelines improved the quality of their diagnostic or therapeutic skills. However, implementation is often seen as being complicated (43%) and restricting the physician’s ability to act independently (63%). Survey participants suggested that guidelines could be optimised by giving greater consideration to nondrug alternatives (46%), focusing on issues related to quality of life (42%) and offering a comparative assessment of various treatment options (39%). In order to further promote the attractiveness of guidelines for primary care the design of guidelines should be oriented more towards their application; they should be well-presented to make them easier to implement. The scope of action available to the physician should be stressed. The guidelines should provide recommendations on opportunities for the delegation of tasks within practice teams. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10354-021-00849-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2021-06-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8484242/ /pubmed/34101082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-021-00849-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wangler, Julian
Jansky, Michael
What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?: Results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in Germany
title What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?: Results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in Germany
title_full What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?: Results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in Germany
title_fullStr What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?: Results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in Germany
title_full_unstemmed What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?: Results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in Germany
title_short What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?: Results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in Germany
title_sort what is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?: results of an exploratory online survey of general practitioners in germany
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-021-00849-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglerjulian whatisthesignificanceofguidelinesintheprimarycaresettingresultsofanexploratoryonlinesurveyofgeneralpractitionersingermany
AT janskymichael whatisthesignificanceofguidelinesintheprimarycaresettingresultsofanexploratoryonlinesurveyofgeneralpractitionersingermany