Cargando…
Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe
Somatic gene editing (SGE) holds great promise for making genetic therapy possible for many monogenic conditions very soon. Is our current system of European market authorization and reimbursement ready for the expected tsunami of gene therapies? At a recent workshop of the Netherlands ZonMw consort...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00877-y |
_version_ | 1784577368435720192 |
---|---|
author | Rigter, Tessel Klein, David Weinreich, Stephanie S. Cornel, Martina C. |
author_facet | Rigter, Tessel Klein, David Weinreich, Stephanie S. Cornel, Martina C. |
author_sort | Rigter, Tessel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Somatic gene editing (SGE) holds great promise for making genetic therapy possible for many monogenic conditions very soon. Is our current system of European market authorization and reimbursement ready for the expected tsunami of gene therapies? At a recent workshop of the Netherlands ZonMw consortium on ethical, legal, and social implications of personalized medicine, we discussed the current possibilities for bringing new gene therapies to the clinic. In Europe, it is not yet clear whether the route via the European medicines agency as an advanced therapy medicinal product is the most appropriate for evaluation of highly personalized SGE applications, although this may optimally guarantee safety and effectiveness. Compassionate use may ensure faster access than the centralized procedure but does not stimulate the commercial development of products. Prescription to named patients may only provide adequate access for single patients. Temporary authorization of use may allow access to medication half a year before formal market authorization has been granted, but may also have large budget impacts. Magistral compounding under a hospital exemption may be an attractive solution for rare, tailor-made applications at an acceptable price. To approve local experimental use of a therapy on a case-by-case basis may be fast, but does not guarantee optimal safety, effectiveness, and broad implementation. We argue that alternative routes should be considered for products developed for a market of large groups of patients versus unique personalized treatments. A balance between scientific evidence for safety and effectiveness, affordability, and fast access may demand a range of alternative solutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8484669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84846692021-10-12 Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe Rigter, Tessel Klein, David Weinreich, Stephanie S. Cornel, Martina C. Eur J Hum Genet Viewpoint Somatic gene editing (SGE) holds great promise for making genetic therapy possible for many monogenic conditions very soon. Is our current system of European market authorization and reimbursement ready for the expected tsunami of gene therapies? At a recent workshop of the Netherlands ZonMw consortium on ethical, legal, and social implications of personalized medicine, we discussed the current possibilities for bringing new gene therapies to the clinic. In Europe, it is not yet clear whether the route via the European medicines agency as an advanced therapy medicinal product is the most appropriate for evaluation of highly personalized SGE applications, although this may optimally guarantee safety and effectiveness. Compassionate use may ensure faster access than the centralized procedure but does not stimulate the commercial development of products. Prescription to named patients may only provide adequate access for single patients. Temporary authorization of use may allow access to medication half a year before formal market authorization has been granted, but may also have large budget impacts. Magistral compounding under a hospital exemption may be an attractive solution for rare, tailor-made applications at an acceptable price. To approve local experimental use of a therapy on a case-by-case basis may be fast, but does not guarantee optimal safety, effectiveness, and broad implementation. We argue that alternative routes should be considered for products developed for a market of large groups of patients versus unique personalized treatments. A balance between scientific evidence for safety and effectiveness, affordability, and fast access may demand a range of alternative solutions. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-14 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8484669/ /pubmed/33850300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00877-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Rigter, Tessel Klein, David Weinreich, Stephanie S. Cornel, Martina C. Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe |
title | Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe |
title_full | Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe |
title_fullStr | Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe |
title_short | Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe |
title_sort | moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in europe |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00877-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rigtertessel movingsomaticgeneeditingtotheclinicroutestomarketaccessandreimbursementineurope AT kleindavid movingsomaticgeneeditingtotheclinicroutestomarketaccessandreimbursementineurope AT weinreichstephanies movingsomaticgeneeditingtotheclinicroutestomarketaccessandreimbursementineurope AT cornelmartinac movingsomaticgeneeditingtotheclinicroutestomarketaccessandreimbursementineurope |