Cargando…

Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe

Somatic gene editing (SGE) holds great promise for making genetic therapy possible for many monogenic conditions very soon. Is our current system of European market authorization and reimbursement ready for the expected tsunami of gene therapies? At a recent workshop of the Netherlands ZonMw consort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rigter, Tessel, Klein, David, Weinreich, Stephanie S., Cornel, Martina C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00877-y
_version_ 1784577368435720192
author Rigter, Tessel
Klein, David
Weinreich, Stephanie S.
Cornel, Martina C.
author_facet Rigter, Tessel
Klein, David
Weinreich, Stephanie S.
Cornel, Martina C.
author_sort Rigter, Tessel
collection PubMed
description Somatic gene editing (SGE) holds great promise for making genetic therapy possible for many monogenic conditions very soon. Is our current system of European market authorization and reimbursement ready for the expected tsunami of gene therapies? At a recent workshop of the Netherlands ZonMw consortium on ethical, legal, and social implications of personalized medicine, we discussed the current possibilities for bringing new gene therapies to the clinic. In Europe, it is not yet clear whether the route via the European medicines agency as an advanced therapy medicinal product is the most appropriate for evaluation of highly personalized SGE applications, although this may optimally guarantee safety and effectiveness. Compassionate use may ensure faster access than the centralized procedure but does not stimulate the commercial development of products. Prescription to named patients may only provide adequate access for single patients. Temporary authorization of use may allow access to medication half a year before formal market authorization has been granted, but may also have large budget impacts. Magistral compounding under a hospital exemption may be an attractive solution for rare, tailor-made applications at an acceptable price. To approve local experimental use of a therapy on a case-by-case basis may be fast, but does not guarantee optimal safety, effectiveness, and broad implementation. We argue that alternative routes should be considered for products developed for a market of large groups of patients versus unique personalized treatments. A balance between scientific evidence for safety and effectiveness, affordability, and fast access may demand a range of alternative solutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8484669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84846692021-10-12 Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe Rigter, Tessel Klein, David Weinreich, Stephanie S. Cornel, Martina C. Eur J Hum Genet Viewpoint Somatic gene editing (SGE) holds great promise for making genetic therapy possible for many monogenic conditions very soon. Is our current system of European market authorization and reimbursement ready for the expected tsunami of gene therapies? At a recent workshop of the Netherlands ZonMw consortium on ethical, legal, and social implications of personalized medicine, we discussed the current possibilities for bringing new gene therapies to the clinic. In Europe, it is not yet clear whether the route via the European medicines agency as an advanced therapy medicinal product is the most appropriate for evaluation of highly personalized SGE applications, although this may optimally guarantee safety and effectiveness. Compassionate use may ensure faster access than the centralized procedure but does not stimulate the commercial development of products. Prescription to named patients may only provide adequate access for single patients. Temporary authorization of use may allow access to medication half a year before formal market authorization has been granted, but may also have large budget impacts. Magistral compounding under a hospital exemption may be an attractive solution for rare, tailor-made applications at an acceptable price. To approve local experimental use of a therapy on a case-by-case basis may be fast, but does not guarantee optimal safety, effectiveness, and broad implementation. We argue that alternative routes should be considered for products developed for a market of large groups of patients versus unique personalized treatments. A balance between scientific evidence for safety and effectiveness, affordability, and fast access may demand a range of alternative solutions. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-14 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8484669/ /pubmed/33850300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00877-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Rigter, Tessel
Klein, David
Weinreich, Stephanie S.
Cornel, Martina C.
Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe
title Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe
title_full Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe
title_fullStr Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe
title_short Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe
title_sort moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in europe
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00877-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rigtertessel movingsomaticgeneeditingtotheclinicroutestomarketaccessandreimbursementineurope
AT kleindavid movingsomaticgeneeditingtotheclinicroutestomarketaccessandreimbursementineurope
AT weinreichstephanies movingsomaticgeneeditingtotheclinicroutestomarketaccessandreimbursementineurope
AT cornelmartinac movingsomaticgeneeditingtotheclinicroutestomarketaccessandreimbursementineurope