Cargando…

Thermal tolerance and preference are both consistent with the clinal distribution of house fly proto‐Y chromosomes

Selection pressures can vary within localized areas and across massive geographical scales. Temperature is one of the best studied ecologically variable abiotic factors that can affect selection pressures across multiple spatial scales. Organisms rely on physiological (thermal tolerance) and behavio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delclos, Pablo J., Adhikari, Kiran, Hassan, Oluwatomi, Cambric, Jessica E., Matuk, Anna G., Presley, Rebecca I., Tran, Jessica, Sriskantharajah, Vyshnika, Meisel, Richard P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.248
_version_ 1784577381699158016
author Delclos, Pablo J.
Adhikari, Kiran
Hassan, Oluwatomi
Cambric, Jessica E.
Matuk, Anna G.
Presley, Rebecca I.
Tran, Jessica
Sriskantharajah, Vyshnika
Meisel, Richard P.
author_facet Delclos, Pablo J.
Adhikari, Kiran
Hassan, Oluwatomi
Cambric, Jessica E.
Matuk, Anna G.
Presley, Rebecca I.
Tran, Jessica
Sriskantharajah, Vyshnika
Meisel, Richard P.
author_sort Delclos, Pablo J.
collection PubMed
description Selection pressures can vary within localized areas and across massive geographical scales. Temperature is one of the best studied ecologically variable abiotic factors that can affect selection pressures across multiple spatial scales. Organisms rely on physiological (thermal tolerance) and behavioral (thermal preference) mechanisms to thermoregulate in response to environmental temperature. In addition, spatial heterogeneity in temperatures can select for local adaptation in thermal tolerance, thermal preference, or both. However, the concordance between thermal tolerance and preference across genotypes and sexes within species and across populations is greatly understudied. The house fly, Musca domestica, is a well‐suited system to examine how genotype and environment interact to affect thermal tolerance and preference. Across multiple continents, house fly males from higher latitudes tend to carry the male‐determining gene on the Y chromosome, whereas those from lower latitudes usually have the male determiner on the third chromosome. We tested whether these two male‐determining chromosomes differentially affect thermal tolerance and preference as predicted by their geographical distributions. We identify effects of genotype and developmental temperature on male thermal tolerance and preference that are concordant with the natural distributions of the chromosomes, suggesting that temperature variation across the species range contributes to the maintenance of the polymorphism. In contrast, female thermal preference is bimodal and largely independent of congener male genotypes. These sexually dimorphic thermal preferences suggest that temperature‐dependent mating dynamics within populations could further affect the distribution of the two chromosomes. Together, the differences in thermal tolerance and preference across sexes and male genotypes suggest that different selection pressures may affect the frequencies of the male‐determining chromosomes across different spatial scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8484723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84847232021-10-06 Thermal tolerance and preference are both consistent with the clinal distribution of house fly proto‐Y chromosomes Delclos, Pablo J. Adhikari, Kiran Hassan, Oluwatomi Cambric, Jessica E. Matuk, Anna G. Presley, Rebecca I. Tran, Jessica Sriskantharajah, Vyshnika Meisel, Richard P. Evol Lett Letters Selection pressures can vary within localized areas and across massive geographical scales. Temperature is one of the best studied ecologically variable abiotic factors that can affect selection pressures across multiple spatial scales. Organisms rely on physiological (thermal tolerance) and behavioral (thermal preference) mechanisms to thermoregulate in response to environmental temperature. In addition, spatial heterogeneity in temperatures can select for local adaptation in thermal tolerance, thermal preference, or both. However, the concordance between thermal tolerance and preference across genotypes and sexes within species and across populations is greatly understudied. The house fly, Musca domestica, is a well‐suited system to examine how genotype and environment interact to affect thermal tolerance and preference. Across multiple continents, house fly males from higher latitudes tend to carry the male‐determining gene on the Y chromosome, whereas those from lower latitudes usually have the male determiner on the third chromosome. We tested whether these two male‐determining chromosomes differentially affect thermal tolerance and preference as predicted by their geographical distributions. We identify effects of genotype and developmental temperature on male thermal tolerance and preference that are concordant with the natural distributions of the chromosomes, suggesting that temperature variation across the species range contributes to the maintenance of the polymorphism. In contrast, female thermal preference is bimodal and largely independent of congener male genotypes. These sexually dimorphic thermal preferences suggest that temperature‐dependent mating dynamics within populations could further affect the distribution of the two chromosomes. Together, the differences in thermal tolerance and preference across sexes and male genotypes suggest that different selection pressures may affect the frequencies of the male‐determining chromosomes across different spatial scales. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8484723/ /pubmed/34621536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.248 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Delclos, Pablo J.
Adhikari, Kiran
Hassan, Oluwatomi
Cambric, Jessica E.
Matuk, Anna G.
Presley, Rebecca I.
Tran, Jessica
Sriskantharajah, Vyshnika
Meisel, Richard P.
Thermal tolerance and preference are both consistent with the clinal distribution of house fly proto‐Y chromosomes
title Thermal tolerance and preference are both consistent with the clinal distribution of house fly proto‐Y chromosomes
title_full Thermal tolerance and preference are both consistent with the clinal distribution of house fly proto‐Y chromosomes
title_fullStr Thermal tolerance and preference are both consistent with the clinal distribution of house fly proto‐Y chromosomes
title_full_unstemmed Thermal tolerance and preference are both consistent with the clinal distribution of house fly proto‐Y chromosomes
title_short Thermal tolerance and preference are both consistent with the clinal distribution of house fly proto‐Y chromosomes
title_sort thermal tolerance and preference are both consistent with the clinal distribution of house fly proto‐y chromosomes
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.248
work_keys_str_mv AT delclospabloj thermaltoleranceandpreferencearebothconsistentwiththeclinaldistributionofhouseflyprotoychromosomes
AT adhikarikiran thermaltoleranceandpreferencearebothconsistentwiththeclinaldistributionofhouseflyprotoychromosomes
AT hassanoluwatomi thermaltoleranceandpreferencearebothconsistentwiththeclinaldistributionofhouseflyprotoychromosomes
AT cambricjessicae thermaltoleranceandpreferencearebothconsistentwiththeclinaldistributionofhouseflyprotoychromosomes
AT matukannag thermaltoleranceandpreferencearebothconsistentwiththeclinaldistributionofhouseflyprotoychromosomes
AT presleyrebeccai thermaltoleranceandpreferencearebothconsistentwiththeclinaldistributionofhouseflyprotoychromosomes
AT tranjessica thermaltoleranceandpreferencearebothconsistentwiththeclinaldistributionofhouseflyprotoychromosomes
AT sriskantharajahvyshnika thermaltoleranceandpreferencearebothconsistentwiththeclinaldistributionofhouseflyprotoychromosomes
AT meiselrichardp thermaltoleranceandpreferencearebothconsistentwiththeclinaldistributionofhouseflyprotoychromosomes