Cargando…
How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: With the increasing digitalization of the working environment, the demands on managers are changing fundamentally to the point of an emerging field of research in digital leadership. Municipal administrations are particularly affected by the digital transformation processes. Therefore, a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34598724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00335-x |
_version_ | 1784577467975991296 |
---|---|
author | Claassen, Kevin dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil Kettschau, Jan Broding, Horst Christoph |
author_facet | Claassen, Kevin dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil Kettschau, Jan Broding, Horst Christoph |
author_sort | Claassen, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the increasing digitalization of the working environment, the demands on managers are changing fundamentally to the point of an emerging field of research in digital leadership. Municipal administrations are particularly affected by the digital transformation processes. Therefore, a score to measure the construct of digital leadership competence in the context of virtual-based workstation was developed and tested. METHODS: Based on an online survey with n = 546 employees at virtual-based workstations in municipal administrations in 2020, the instrument is tested regarding selectivity (coefficients), dimensionality (principal component analysis), homogeneity (inter-product-moment correlations), reliability (Cronbach’s α) and construct validity (correlation with general leadership skills). RESULTS: The instrument can be considered selective, one-dimensional, homogeneous, reliable and constructively valid in the sense of the formulated hypotheses. By integrating the employees’ perspective, the instrument aims to be one of the first of its kind to initiate a scientific further discourse. Among other things, the categorization of the co-determination component as either traditional or digital leadership can be discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The developed instrument for measuring digital leadership performs well concerning the aspects of discriminatory power, one-dimensionality, homogeneity, reliability as well as construct validity. It aims to induce further research and a scientific discourse on the topic of health-oriented leadership within the world of work 4.0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8485107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84851072021-10-01 How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study Claassen, Kevin dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil Kettschau, Jan Broding, Horst Christoph J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: With the increasing digitalization of the working environment, the demands on managers are changing fundamentally to the point of an emerging field of research in digital leadership. Municipal administrations are particularly affected by the digital transformation processes. Therefore, a score to measure the construct of digital leadership competence in the context of virtual-based workstation was developed and tested. METHODS: Based on an online survey with n = 546 employees at virtual-based workstations in municipal administrations in 2020, the instrument is tested regarding selectivity (coefficients), dimensionality (principal component analysis), homogeneity (inter-product-moment correlations), reliability (Cronbach’s α) and construct validity (correlation with general leadership skills). RESULTS: The instrument can be considered selective, one-dimensional, homogeneous, reliable and constructively valid in the sense of the formulated hypotheses. By integrating the employees’ perspective, the instrument aims to be one of the first of its kind to initiate a scientific further discourse. Among other things, the categorization of the co-determination component as either traditional or digital leadership can be discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The developed instrument for measuring digital leadership performs well concerning the aspects of discriminatory power, one-dimensionality, homogeneity, reliability as well as construct validity. It aims to induce further research and a scientific discourse on the topic of health-oriented leadership within the world of work 4.0. BioMed Central 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8485107/ /pubmed/34598724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00335-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Claassen, Kevin dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil Kettschau, Jan Broding, Horst Christoph How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study |
title | How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | how to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34598724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00335-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claassenkevin howtoevaluatedigitalleadershipacrosssectionalstudy AT dosanjosdominiquerodil howtoevaluatedigitalleadershipacrosssectionalstudy AT kettschaujan howtoevaluatedigitalleadershipacrosssectionalstudy AT brodinghorstchristoph howtoevaluatedigitalleadershipacrosssectionalstudy |