Cargando…

How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: With the increasing digitalization of the working environment, the demands on managers are changing fundamentally to the point of an emerging field of research in digital leadership. Municipal administrations are particularly affected by the digital transformation processes. Therefore, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claassen, Kevin, dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil, Kettschau, Jan, Broding, Horst Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34598724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00335-x
_version_ 1784577467975991296
author Claassen, Kevin
dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil
Kettschau, Jan
Broding, Horst Christoph
author_facet Claassen, Kevin
dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil
Kettschau, Jan
Broding, Horst Christoph
author_sort Claassen, Kevin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the increasing digitalization of the working environment, the demands on managers are changing fundamentally to the point of an emerging field of research in digital leadership. Municipal administrations are particularly affected by the digital transformation processes. Therefore, a score to measure the construct of digital leadership competence in the context of virtual-based workstation was developed and tested. METHODS: Based on an online survey with n = 546 employees at virtual-based workstations in municipal administrations in 2020, the instrument is tested regarding selectivity (coefficients), dimensionality (principal component analysis), homogeneity (inter-product-moment correlations), reliability (Cronbach’s α) and construct validity (correlation with general leadership skills). RESULTS: The instrument can be considered selective, one-dimensional, homogeneous, reliable and constructively valid in the sense of the formulated hypotheses. By integrating the employees’ perspective, the instrument aims to be one of the first of its kind to initiate a scientific further discourse. Among other things, the categorization of the co-determination component as either traditional or digital leadership can be discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The developed instrument for measuring digital leadership performs well concerning the aspects of discriminatory power, one-dimensionality, homogeneity, reliability as well as construct validity. It aims to induce further research and a scientific discourse on the topic of health-oriented leadership within the world of work 4.0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8485107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84851072021-10-01 How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study Claassen, Kevin dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil Kettschau, Jan Broding, Horst Christoph J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: With the increasing digitalization of the working environment, the demands on managers are changing fundamentally to the point of an emerging field of research in digital leadership. Municipal administrations are particularly affected by the digital transformation processes. Therefore, a score to measure the construct of digital leadership competence in the context of virtual-based workstation was developed and tested. METHODS: Based on an online survey with n = 546 employees at virtual-based workstations in municipal administrations in 2020, the instrument is tested regarding selectivity (coefficients), dimensionality (principal component analysis), homogeneity (inter-product-moment correlations), reliability (Cronbach’s α) and construct validity (correlation with general leadership skills). RESULTS: The instrument can be considered selective, one-dimensional, homogeneous, reliable and constructively valid in the sense of the formulated hypotheses. By integrating the employees’ perspective, the instrument aims to be one of the first of its kind to initiate a scientific further discourse. Among other things, the categorization of the co-determination component as either traditional or digital leadership can be discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The developed instrument for measuring digital leadership performs well concerning the aspects of discriminatory power, one-dimensionality, homogeneity, reliability as well as construct validity. It aims to induce further research and a scientific discourse on the topic of health-oriented leadership within the world of work 4.0. BioMed Central 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8485107/ /pubmed/34598724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00335-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Claassen, Kevin
dos Anjos, Dominique Rodil
Kettschau, Jan
Broding, Horst Christoph
How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study
title How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study
title_full How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study
title_short How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study
title_sort how to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34598724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00335-x
work_keys_str_mv AT claassenkevin howtoevaluatedigitalleadershipacrosssectionalstudy
AT dosanjosdominiquerodil howtoevaluatedigitalleadershipacrosssectionalstudy
AT kettschaujan howtoevaluatedigitalleadershipacrosssectionalstudy
AT brodinghorstchristoph howtoevaluatedigitalleadershipacrosssectionalstudy