Cargando…

The “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones

Large meta-analyses demonstrated that ureteral access sheaths (UAS) have specific complications during and after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). The present study focused on the technical aspects, advantages, drawbacks, and limitations of the latest “no-touch” technique (NTT) in the flexible ureterosc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geavlete, Bogdan, Cozma, Cosmin, Geavlete, Petrisor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Carol Davila University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621370
http://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2021-0217
_version_ 1784577526748676096
author Geavlete, Bogdan
Cozma, Cosmin
Geavlete, Petrisor
author_facet Geavlete, Bogdan
Cozma, Cosmin
Geavlete, Petrisor
author_sort Geavlete, Bogdan
collection PubMed
description Large meta-analyses demonstrated that ureteral access sheaths (UAS) have specific complications during and after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). The present study focused on the technical aspects, advantages, drawbacks, and limitations of the latest “no-touch” technique (NTT) in the flexible ureteroscopic therapeutic approach of renal stones. A total of 288 patients with a single pyelocaliceal stone (largest diameter between 11 and 29 mm) underwent fURS: 144 using the 12/14 Fr UAS (group 1) and 144 without UAS (group 2). For NTT, we used four types of ureteroscopes: Olympus URF-V2 (8.5 Fr) – 33 cases, Storz Flex X2 (8.4 Fr) – 60 cases, single-use PUSEN PU 3022 (9.5 Fr) – 37 cases, and single-use PUSEN – PU 3033A (7.5 Fr) – 14 cases. For group 1, we used the Olympus URF–V2 ureteroscope in 44 cases, the Storz Flex X2 in 58 cases, and the single-use PUSEN PU 3022 in 42 cases. We compared the operative time, hospitalization periods, and complications. Successful access sheath insertion was noted in 83.3% of cases from group 1, and successful ureteroscope insertion was noted in 90.9% of cases from group 2. The average operative time was slightly higher in group 1 vs. group 2 (47 vs. 39 min). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were overall lower in group 2 (76.3% vs. 86.8%) at 1 month. At 3 months, we did not find a significant difference between these two groups. Superficial mucosal ureteral wall lesions were found in 38.8% of patients from group 1 and 4.1% from group 2. Hospitalization periods were longer in group 1 vs. group 2 (21 vs. 29 hours, respectively). The single-use 7.5 Fr ureteroscope should receive a special mention: the insertion was simple, we did not encounter any mucosal ureteral wall lesions, and all patients were discharged on the same day. Despite the clear advantages of routine UAS usage, there are many adverse events for the patient. Larger diameter sheaths involve a greater risk of ureteral wall injury. NTT seems to improve peri- and postoperative safety while preserving therapeutic efficiency. The new 7.5 Fr ureteroscopes appear to optimize surgical efficiency and diminish complications in the flexible ureteroscopic treatment of renal stones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8485380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Carol Davila University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84853802021-10-06 The “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones Geavlete, Bogdan Cozma, Cosmin Geavlete, Petrisor J Med Life Original Article Large meta-analyses demonstrated that ureteral access sheaths (UAS) have specific complications during and after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). The present study focused on the technical aspects, advantages, drawbacks, and limitations of the latest “no-touch” technique (NTT) in the flexible ureteroscopic therapeutic approach of renal stones. A total of 288 patients with a single pyelocaliceal stone (largest diameter between 11 and 29 mm) underwent fURS: 144 using the 12/14 Fr UAS (group 1) and 144 without UAS (group 2). For NTT, we used four types of ureteroscopes: Olympus URF-V2 (8.5 Fr) – 33 cases, Storz Flex X2 (8.4 Fr) – 60 cases, single-use PUSEN PU 3022 (9.5 Fr) – 37 cases, and single-use PUSEN – PU 3033A (7.5 Fr) – 14 cases. For group 1, we used the Olympus URF–V2 ureteroscope in 44 cases, the Storz Flex X2 in 58 cases, and the single-use PUSEN PU 3022 in 42 cases. We compared the operative time, hospitalization periods, and complications. Successful access sheath insertion was noted in 83.3% of cases from group 1, and successful ureteroscope insertion was noted in 90.9% of cases from group 2. The average operative time was slightly higher in group 1 vs. group 2 (47 vs. 39 min). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were overall lower in group 2 (76.3% vs. 86.8%) at 1 month. At 3 months, we did not find a significant difference between these two groups. Superficial mucosal ureteral wall lesions were found in 38.8% of patients from group 1 and 4.1% from group 2. Hospitalization periods were longer in group 1 vs. group 2 (21 vs. 29 hours, respectively). The single-use 7.5 Fr ureteroscope should receive a special mention: the insertion was simple, we did not encounter any mucosal ureteral wall lesions, and all patients were discharged on the same day. Despite the clear advantages of routine UAS usage, there are many adverse events for the patient. Larger diameter sheaths involve a greater risk of ureteral wall injury. NTT seems to improve peri- and postoperative safety while preserving therapeutic efficiency. The new 7.5 Fr ureteroscopes appear to optimize surgical efficiency and diminish complications in the flexible ureteroscopic treatment of renal stones. Carol Davila University Press 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8485380/ /pubmed/34621370 http://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2021-0217 Text en ©2021 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Geavlete, Bogdan
Cozma, Cosmin
Geavlete, Petrisor
The “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones
title The “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones
title_full The “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones
title_fullStr The “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones
title_full_unstemmed The “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones
title_short The “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones
title_sort “no-touch” technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621370
http://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2021-0217
work_keys_str_mv AT geavletebogdan thenotouchtechniqueintheflexibleureteroscopicapproachofrenalstones
AT cozmacosmin thenotouchtechniqueintheflexibleureteroscopicapproachofrenalstones
AT geavletepetrisor thenotouchtechniqueintheflexibleureteroscopicapproachofrenalstones
AT geavletebogdan notouchtechniqueintheflexibleureteroscopicapproachofrenalstones
AT cozmacosmin notouchtechniqueintheflexibleureteroscopicapproachofrenalstones
AT geavletepetrisor notouchtechniqueintheflexibleureteroscopicapproachofrenalstones