Cargando…

The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation

Colonoscopy, since it was first employed over 60 years ago, is now the gold standard method for visualizing the mucosa of the colon, but should be of good quality. Many factors affect quality, including the type of health service organization, type of facility, staff, equipment, patient characterist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tontini, Gian E, Prada, Alberto, Sferrazza, Sandro, Ciprandi, Giorgio, Vecchi, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12653
_version_ 1784577534833197056
author Tontini, Gian E
Prada, Alberto
Sferrazza, Sandro
Ciprandi, Giorgio
Vecchi, Maurizio
author_facet Tontini, Gian E
Prada, Alberto
Sferrazza, Sandro
Ciprandi, Giorgio
Vecchi, Maurizio
author_sort Tontini, Gian E
collection PubMed
description Colonoscopy, since it was first employed over 60 years ago, is now the gold standard method for visualizing the mucosa of the colon, but should be of good quality. Many factors affect quality, including the type of health service organization, type of facility, staff, equipment, patient characteristics, and bowel preparation (BP). The adequacy of bowel cleansing is critical, but, unfortunately, may be inadequate in up to one‐third of procedures. The current article will present and discuss the main BPs and their drawbacks, which include patient‐dependent and procedure‐dependent factors. Cleansing quality depends on the ease/complexity of solution preparation, volume, taste, and timing of consumption. Consequently, important positive factors include simple instructions, easy preparation of the solution, low volume, pleasant taste, short drinking time (e.g. <30 min), and splitting the dose between the evening before and the morning of the colonoscopy (or even better, only one dose in the early morning to avoid night‐time problems), and short onset of action. The BP solution must also be safe with negligible side effects. Furthermore, a positive experience supports patient willingness to repeat the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8485412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84854122021-10-06 The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation Tontini, Gian E Prada, Alberto Sferrazza, Sandro Ciprandi, Giorgio Vecchi, Maurizio JGH Open Review Articles Colonoscopy, since it was first employed over 60 years ago, is now the gold standard method for visualizing the mucosa of the colon, but should be of good quality. Many factors affect quality, including the type of health service organization, type of facility, staff, equipment, patient characteristics, and bowel preparation (BP). The adequacy of bowel cleansing is critical, but, unfortunately, may be inadequate in up to one‐third of procedures. The current article will present and discuss the main BPs and their drawbacks, which include patient‐dependent and procedure‐dependent factors. Cleansing quality depends on the ease/complexity of solution preparation, volume, taste, and timing of consumption. Consequently, important positive factors include simple instructions, easy preparation of the solution, low volume, pleasant taste, short drinking time (e.g. <30 min), and splitting the dose between the evening before and the morning of the colonoscopy (or even better, only one dose in the early morning to avoid night‐time problems), and short onset of action. The BP solution must also be safe with negligible side effects. Furthermore, a positive experience supports patient willingness to repeat the procedure. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8485412/ /pubmed/34621998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12653 Text en © 2021 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Tontini, Gian E
Prada, Alberto
Sferrazza, Sandro
Ciprandi, Giorgio
Vecchi, Maurizio
The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
title The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
title_full The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
title_fullStr The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
title_full_unstemmed The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
title_short The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
title_sort unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12653
work_keys_str_mv AT tontinigiane theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation
AT pradaalberto theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation
AT sferrazzasandro theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation
AT ciprandigiorgio theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation
AT vecchimaurizio theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation
AT tontinigiane unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation
AT pradaalberto unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation
AT sferrazzasandro unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation
AT ciprandigiorgio unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation
AT vecchimaurizio unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation