Cargando…
The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation
Colonoscopy, since it was first employed over 60 years ago, is now the gold standard method for visualizing the mucosa of the colon, but should be of good quality. Many factors affect quality, including the type of health service organization, type of facility, staff, equipment, patient characterist...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12653 |
_version_ | 1784577534833197056 |
---|---|
author | Tontini, Gian E Prada, Alberto Sferrazza, Sandro Ciprandi, Giorgio Vecchi, Maurizio |
author_facet | Tontini, Gian E Prada, Alberto Sferrazza, Sandro Ciprandi, Giorgio Vecchi, Maurizio |
author_sort | Tontini, Gian E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Colonoscopy, since it was first employed over 60 years ago, is now the gold standard method for visualizing the mucosa of the colon, but should be of good quality. Many factors affect quality, including the type of health service organization, type of facility, staff, equipment, patient characteristics, and bowel preparation (BP). The adequacy of bowel cleansing is critical, but, unfortunately, may be inadequate in up to one‐third of procedures. The current article will present and discuss the main BPs and their drawbacks, which include patient‐dependent and procedure‐dependent factors. Cleansing quality depends on the ease/complexity of solution preparation, volume, taste, and timing of consumption. Consequently, important positive factors include simple instructions, easy preparation of the solution, low volume, pleasant taste, short drinking time (e.g. <30 min), and splitting the dose between the evening before and the morning of the colonoscopy (or even better, only one dose in the early morning to avoid night‐time problems), and short onset of action. The BP solution must also be safe with negligible side effects. Furthermore, a positive experience supports patient willingness to repeat the procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8485412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84854122021-10-06 The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation Tontini, Gian E Prada, Alberto Sferrazza, Sandro Ciprandi, Giorgio Vecchi, Maurizio JGH Open Review Articles Colonoscopy, since it was first employed over 60 years ago, is now the gold standard method for visualizing the mucosa of the colon, but should be of good quality. Many factors affect quality, including the type of health service organization, type of facility, staff, equipment, patient characteristics, and bowel preparation (BP). The adequacy of bowel cleansing is critical, but, unfortunately, may be inadequate in up to one‐third of procedures. The current article will present and discuss the main BPs and their drawbacks, which include patient‐dependent and procedure‐dependent factors. Cleansing quality depends on the ease/complexity of solution preparation, volume, taste, and timing of consumption. Consequently, important positive factors include simple instructions, easy preparation of the solution, low volume, pleasant taste, short drinking time (e.g. <30 min), and splitting the dose between the evening before and the morning of the colonoscopy (or even better, only one dose in the early morning to avoid night‐time problems), and short onset of action. The BP solution must also be safe with negligible side effects. Furthermore, a positive experience supports patient willingness to repeat the procedure. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8485412/ /pubmed/34621998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12653 Text en © 2021 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Tontini, Gian E Prada, Alberto Sferrazza, Sandro Ciprandi, Giorgio Vecchi, Maurizio The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation |
title | The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation |
title_full | The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation |
title_fullStr | The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation |
title_full_unstemmed | The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation |
title_short | The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation |
title_sort | unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tontinigiane theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation AT pradaalberto theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation AT sferrazzasandro theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation AT ciprandigiorgio theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation AT vecchimaurizio theunmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation AT tontinigiane unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation AT pradaalberto unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation AT sferrazzasandro unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation AT ciprandigiorgio unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation AT vecchimaurizio unmetneedsforidentifyingtheidealbowelpreparation |