Cargando…

Performance of NEWS2, RETTS, clinical judgment and the Predict Sepsis screening tools with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with suspected infection: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence of which sepsis screening tool to use in the ambulance setting. The primary aim of the current study was to compare the performance of NEWS2 (National Early Warning score 2) and RETTS (Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System) with respect to identification of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallgren, Ulrika M., Sjölin, Jan, Järnbert-Pettersson, Hans, Kurland, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00958-3
_version_ 1784577541802033152
author Wallgren, Ulrika M.
Sjölin, Jan
Järnbert-Pettersson, Hans
Kurland, Lisa
author_facet Wallgren, Ulrika M.
Sjölin, Jan
Järnbert-Pettersson, Hans
Kurland, Lisa
author_sort Wallgren, Ulrika M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is little evidence of which sepsis screening tool to use in the ambulance setting. The primary aim of the current study was to compare the performance of NEWS2 (National Early Warning score 2) and RETTS (Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System) with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with clinically suspected infection. The secondary aim was to compare the performance of the novel Predict Sepsis screening tools with that of NEWS2, RETTS and clinical judgment. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 323 adult ambulance patients with clinically suspected infection, transported to hospitals in Stockholm, during 2017/2018. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC (Area Under the receiver operating Curve) were calculated and compared by using McNemar´s test and DeLong’s test. RESULTS: The prevalence of sepsis in the current study population was 44.6% (144 of 323 patients). No significant difference in AUC was demonstrated between NEWS2 ≥ 5 and RETTS ≥ orange. NEWS2 ≥ 7 demonstrated a significantly greater AUC than RETTS red. The Predict Sepsis screening tools ≥ 2 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (range 0.87–0.91), along with RETTS ≥ orange (0.83), but the lowest specificity (range 0.39–0.49). The AUC of NEWS2 (0.73) and the Predict Sepsis screening tools (range 0.75–0.77) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that NEWS2 could be the better alternative for sepsis identification in the ambulance, as compared to RETTS. The Predict Sepsis screening tools demonstrated a high sensitivity and AUCs similar to that of NEWS2. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution as the Predict Sepsis screening tools require external validation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03249597. Registered 15 August 2017—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03249597. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00958-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8485465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84854652021-10-04 Performance of NEWS2, RETTS, clinical judgment and the Predict Sepsis screening tools with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with suspected infection: a prospective cohort study Wallgren, Ulrika M. Sjölin, Jan Järnbert-Pettersson, Hans Kurland, Lisa Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: There is little evidence of which sepsis screening tool to use in the ambulance setting. The primary aim of the current study was to compare the performance of NEWS2 (National Early Warning score 2) and RETTS (Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System) with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with clinically suspected infection. The secondary aim was to compare the performance of the novel Predict Sepsis screening tools with that of NEWS2, RETTS and clinical judgment. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 323 adult ambulance patients with clinically suspected infection, transported to hospitals in Stockholm, during 2017/2018. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC (Area Under the receiver operating Curve) were calculated and compared by using McNemar´s test and DeLong’s test. RESULTS: The prevalence of sepsis in the current study population was 44.6% (144 of 323 patients). No significant difference in AUC was demonstrated between NEWS2 ≥ 5 and RETTS ≥ orange. NEWS2 ≥ 7 demonstrated a significantly greater AUC than RETTS red. The Predict Sepsis screening tools ≥ 2 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (range 0.87–0.91), along with RETTS ≥ orange (0.83), but the lowest specificity (range 0.39–0.49). The AUC of NEWS2 (0.73) and the Predict Sepsis screening tools (range 0.75–0.77) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that NEWS2 could be the better alternative for sepsis identification in the ambulance, as compared to RETTS. The Predict Sepsis screening tools demonstrated a high sensitivity and AUCs similar to that of NEWS2. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution as the Predict Sepsis screening tools require external validation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03249597. Registered 15 August 2017—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03249597. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00958-3. BioMed Central 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8485465/ /pubmed/34593001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00958-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wallgren, Ulrika M.
Sjölin, Jan
Järnbert-Pettersson, Hans
Kurland, Lisa
Performance of NEWS2, RETTS, clinical judgment and the Predict Sepsis screening tools with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with suspected infection: a prospective cohort study
title Performance of NEWS2, RETTS, clinical judgment and the Predict Sepsis screening tools with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with suspected infection: a prospective cohort study
title_full Performance of NEWS2, RETTS, clinical judgment and the Predict Sepsis screening tools with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with suspected infection: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Performance of NEWS2, RETTS, clinical judgment and the Predict Sepsis screening tools with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with suspected infection: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Performance of NEWS2, RETTS, clinical judgment and the Predict Sepsis screening tools with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with suspected infection: a prospective cohort study
title_short Performance of NEWS2, RETTS, clinical judgment and the Predict Sepsis screening tools with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with suspected infection: a prospective cohort study
title_sort performance of news2, retts, clinical judgment and the predict sepsis screening tools with respect to identification of sepsis among ambulance patients with suspected infection: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00958-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wallgrenulrikam performanceofnews2rettsclinicaljudgmentandthepredictsepsisscreeningtoolswithrespecttoidentificationofsepsisamongambulancepatientswithsuspectedinfectionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sjolinjan performanceofnews2rettsclinicaljudgmentandthepredictsepsisscreeningtoolswithrespecttoidentificationofsepsisamongambulancepatientswithsuspectedinfectionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT jarnbertpetterssonhans performanceofnews2rettsclinicaljudgmentandthepredictsepsisscreeningtoolswithrespecttoidentificationofsepsisamongambulancepatientswithsuspectedinfectionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kurlandlisa performanceofnews2rettsclinicaljudgmentandthepredictsepsisscreeningtoolswithrespecttoidentificationofsepsisamongambulancepatientswithsuspectedinfectionaprospectivecohortstudy