Cargando…

Dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom?

Intensive chemotherapy has been the backbone of the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for decades. However, an increase in novel targeted agents, which has been brought about in part by a deeper understanding of the genetic makeup of AML, has led to remission- inducing regimens that do not r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCurdy, Shannon R., Luger, Selina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fondazione Ferrata Storti 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34320781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2020.269134
_version_ 1784577579554963456
author McCurdy, Shannon R.
Luger, Selina M.
author_facet McCurdy, Shannon R.
Luger, Selina M.
author_sort McCurdy, Shannon R.
collection PubMed
description Intensive chemotherapy has been the backbone of the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for decades. However, an increase in novel targeted agents, which has been brought about in part by a deeper understanding of the genetic makeup of AML, has led to remission- inducing regimens that do not require traditional cytotoxic agents. Combinations of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) and venetoclax have doubled the chance of remission for patients considered unfit for induction chemotherapy who would have traditionally been offered singleagent HMA. In fact, this regimen may rival the complete remission rate achieved with induction chemotherapy for certain populations such as the very elderly and those with secondary AML, but equivalency has yet to be established. Further advances include the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin and FLT3 inhibitors to induction chemotherapy, which improves survival for patients with core-binding factor and FLT3-mutated AML, respectively. Still, much work is needed to improve the outcomes of the highest-risk subgroups: frail patients and those with high-risk cytogenetics and/or TP53 mutations. Promisingly, the landscape of AML therapy is shifting dramatically and no longer is intensity, when feasible, always the best answer for AML.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8485660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Fondazione Ferrata Storti
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84856602021-10-18 Dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom? McCurdy, Shannon R. Luger, Selina M. Haematologica Review Article Intensive chemotherapy has been the backbone of the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for decades. However, an increase in novel targeted agents, which has been brought about in part by a deeper understanding of the genetic makeup of AML, has led to remission- inducing regimens that do not require traditional cytotoxic agents. Combinations of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) and venetoclax have doubled the chance of remission for patients considered unfit for induction chemotherapy who would have traditionally been offered singleagent HMA. In fact, this regimen may rival the complete remission rate achieved with induction chemotherapy for certain populations such as the very elderly and those with secondary AML, but equivalency has yet to be established. Further advances include the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin and FLT3 inhibitors to induction chemotherapy, which improves survival for patients with core-binding factor and FLT3-mutated AML, respectively. Still, much work is needed to improve the outcomes of the highest-risk subgroups: frail patients and those with high-risk cytogenetics and/or TP53 mutations. Promisingly, the landscape of AML therapy is shifting dramatically and no longer is intensity, when feasible, always the best answer for AML. Fondazione Ferrata Storti 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8485660/ /pubmed/34320781 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2020.269134 Text en Copyright© 2021 Ferrata Storti Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
McCurdy, Shannon R.
Luger, Selina M.
Dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom?
title Dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom?
title_full Dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom?
title_fullStr Dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom?
title_full_unstemmed Dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom?
title_short Dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom?
title_sort dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34320781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2020.269134
work_keys_str_mv AT mccurdyshannonr doseintensityforinductioninacutemyeloidleukemiawhatwhenandforwhom
AT lugerselinam doseintensityforinductioninacutemyeloidleukemiawhatwhenandforwhom