Cargando…

Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents

Objectives: We aimed to compare the hemodynamic responses to the active sitting test with the passive head-up tilt test (HUTT) in children and adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). We hypothesized that sitting tachycardia was also present in POTS patients during sitting. Materials a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Hong, Wang, Shuo, Zou, Runmei, Liu, Ping, Li, Fang, Wang, Yuwen, Wang, Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.691390
_version_ 1784577588477296640
author Cai, Hong
Wang, Shuo
Zou, Runmei
Liu, Ping
Li, Fang
Wang, Yuwen
Wang, Cheng
author_facet Cai, Hong
Wang, Shuo
Zou, Runmei
Liu, Ping
Li, Fang
Wang, Yuwen
Wang, Cheng
author_sort Cai, Hong
collection PubMed
description Objectives: We aimed to compare the hemodynamic responses to the active sitting test with the passive head-up tilt test (HUTT) in children and adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). We hypothesized that sitting tachycardia was also present in POTS patients during sitting. Materials and methods: We tested 30 POTS patients and 31 control subjects (mean age = 12 years, range = 9–16 years) who underwent both active sitting test and HUTT successively. We measured the heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) during each test. Results: For both POTS patients and control subjects, the HUTT produced significantly larger HR and BP increases from 3 to 10 min of postural change than did the sitting test. Moreover, POTS patients with excessive orthostatic tachycardia during the HUTT also had significantly larger increases in HR at all test intervals during the sitting test than did the control subjects. A maximum increase in HR ≥ 22 bpm within 10 min of the sitting test was likely suggested to predict orthostatic tachycardia, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3 and 83.9%, respectively. Only six of 30 POTS patients (20%) reached the 40-bpm criterion during the sitting test, and no one complained of sitting intolerance symptoms. Conclusions: We have shown that POTS patients also have sitting tachycardia when changing from a supine position to a sitting position. We believe that the active sitting test is a reasonable alternative maneuver in assessing POTS in population groups that cannot tolerate the standing test or HUTT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8485704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84857042021-10-02 Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents Cai, Hong Wang, Shuo Zou, Runmei Liu, Ping Li, Fang Wang, Yuwen Wang, Cheng Front Pediatr Pediatrics Objectives: We aimed to compare the hemodynamic responses to the active sitting test with the passive head-up tilt test (HUTT) in children and adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). We hypothesized that sitting tachycardia was also present in POTS patients during sitting. Materials and methods: We tested 30 POTS patients and 31 control subjects (mean age = 12 years, range = 9–16 years) who underwent both active sitting test and HUTT successively. We measured the heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) during each test. Results: For both POTS patients and control subjects, the HUTT produced significantly larger HR and BP increases from 3 to 10 min of postural change than did the sitting test. Moreover, POTS patients with excessive orthostatic tachycardia during the HUTT also had significantly larger increases in HR at all test intervals during the sitting test than did the control subjects. A maximum increase in HR ≥ 22 bpm within 10 min of the sitting test was likely suggested to predict orthostatic tachycardia, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3 and 83.9%, respectively. Only six of 30 POTS patients (20%) reached the 40-bpm criterion during the sitting test, and no one complained of sitting intolerance symptoms. Conclusions: We have shown that POTS patients also have sitting tachycardia when changing from a supine position to a sitting position. We believe that the active sitting test is a reasonable alternative maneuver in assessing POTS in population groups that cannot tolerate the standing test or HUTT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8485704/ /pubmed/34604136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.691390 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cai, Wang, Zou, Liu, Li, Wang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Cai, Hong
Wang, Shuo
Zou, Runmei
Liu, Ping
Li, Fang
Wang, Yuwen
Wang, Cheng
Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents
title Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents
title_full Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents
title_fullStr Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents
title_short Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents
title_sort comparison of the active sitting test and head-up tilt test for diagnosis of postural tachycardia syndrome in children and adolescents
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.691390
work_keys_str_mv AT caihong comparisonoftheactivesittingtestandheaduptilttestfordiagnosisofposturaltachycardiasyndromeinchildrenandadolescents
AT wangshuo comparisonoftheactivesittingtestandheaduptilttestfordiagnosisofposturaltachycardiasyndromeinchildrenandadolescents
AT zourunmei comparisonoftheactivesittingtestandheaduptilttestfordiagnosisofposturaltachycardiasyndromeinchildrenandadolescents
AT liuping comparisonoftheactivesittingtestandheaduptilttestfordiagnosisofposturaltachycardiasyndromeinchildrenandadolescents
AT lifang comparisonoftheactivesittingtestandheaduptilttestfordiagnosisofposturaltachycardiasyndromeinchildrenandadolescents
AT wangyuwen comparisonoftheactivesittingtestandheaduptilttestfordiagnosisofposturaltachycardiasyndromeinchildrenandadolescents
AT wangcheng comparisonoftheactivesittingtestandheaduptilttestfordiagnosisofposturaltachycardiasyndromeinchildrenandadolescents