Cargando…

Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pasireotide, cabergoline, ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, and temozolomide for the treatment of Cushing’s disease (CD). METHODS: The primary outcomes were the proportion of CD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia, Correa Neto, Afonso Nogueira Simões, Demetres, Michelle, Boguszewski, Cesar Luiz, Nogueira, Vania dos Santos Nunes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.732240
_version_ 1784577594596786176
author Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia
Correa Neto, Afonso Nogueira Simões
Demetres, Michelle
Boguszewski, Cesar Luiz
Nogueira, Vania dos Santos Nunes
author_facet Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia
Correa Neto, Afonso Nogueira Simões
Demetres, Michelle
Boguszewski, Cesar Luiz
Nogueira, Vania dos Santos Nunes
author_sort Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pasireotide, cabergoline, ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, and temozolomide for the treatment of Cushing’s disease (CD). METHODS: The primary outcomes were the proportion of CD control, adverse events (AE), and reduction of urinary free cortisol. Search strategies were applied to Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL. Independent reviewers assessed the study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Standardized mean difference was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data (i.e., pre- and post-intervention). Random meta-analyses for the proportion of CD control and AE were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-nine controlled and non-controlled studies were included. No study with temozolomide and levoketoconazole and one study with osilodrostat fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The meta-analyses of proportion of CD control was 35% for cabergoline (95% CI: 27–43%, six studies, 141 participants), 44% for pasireotide (95% CI: 25–35%, eight studies, 522 participants), 41% for ketoconazole (95% CI: 36–46%, six studies, 450 participants), 66% for metyrapone (95% CI: 46–87%, four studies, 66 participants), and of 66.4% for osilodrostat (95% CI: 57.9, 74.3, 97 participants, one study). One study compared two different treatments (cabergoline vs. ketoconazole), and no statistical difference was observed in CD control (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.87, 14 participants, very low certainty of evidence). The most frequent AE associated with pasireotide was hyperglycemia, dizziness and nausea with cabergoline and metyrapone, and elevated transaminases with ketoconazole. CONCLUSION: The superiority of one drug over another could not be determined due to lack of controlled studies, but the proportion of disease control identified in our meta-analysis may support clinical decision. New therapeutic options should be investigated due to the limited efficacy and tolerability of the currently available medical treatment for patients with Cushing’s disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020205567, identifier CRD42020205567.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8485729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84857292021-10-02 Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia Correa Neto, Afonso Nogueira Simões Demetres, Michelle Boguszewski, Cesar Luiz Nogueira, Vania dos Santos Nunes Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pasireotide, cabergoline, ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, and temozolomide for the treatment of Cushing’s disease (CD). METHODS: The primary outcomes were the proportion of CD control, adverse events (AE), and reduction of urinary free cortisol. Search strategies were applied to Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL. Independent reviewers assessed the study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Standardized mean difference was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data (i.e., pre- and post-intervention). Random meta-analyses for the proportion of CD control and AE were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-nine controlled and non-controlled studies were included. No study with temozolomide and levoketoconazole and one study with osilodrostat fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The meta-analyses of proportion of CD control was 35% for cabergoline (95% CI: 27–43%, six studies, 141 participants), 44% for pasireotide (95% CI: 25–35%, eight studies, 522 participants), 41% for ketoconazole (95% CI: 36–46%, six studies, 450 participants), 66% for metyrapone (95% CI: 46–87%, four studies, 66 participants), and of 66.4% for osilodrostat (95% CI: 57.9, 74.3, 97 participants, one study). One study compared two different treatments (cabergoline vs. ketoconazole), and no statistical difference was observed in CD control (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.87, 14 participants, very low certainty of evidence). The most frequent AE associated with pasireotide was hyperglycemia, dizziness and nausea with cabergoline and metyrapone, and elevated transaminases with ketoconazole. CONCLUSION: The superiority of one drug over another could not be determined due to lack of controlled studies, but the proportion of disease control identified in our meta-analysis may support clinical decision. New therapeutic options should be investigated due to the limited efficacy and tolerability of the currently available medical treatment for patients with Cushing’s disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020205567, identifier CRD42020205567. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8485729/ /pubmed/34603209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.732240 Text en Copyright © 2021 Simões Corrêa Galendi, Correa Neto, Demetres, Boguszewski and Nogueira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia
Correa Neto, Afonso Nogueira Simões
Demetres, Michelle
Boguszewski, Cesar Luiz
Nogueira, Vania dos Santos Nunes
Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effectiveness of medical treatment of cushing’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.732240
work_keys_str_mv AT simoescorreagalendijulia effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT correanetoafonsonogueirasimoes effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT demetresmichelle effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boguszewskicesarluiz effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nogueiravaniadossantosnunes effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis