Cargando…
Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pasireotide, cabergoline, ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, and temozolomide for the treatment of Cushing’s disease (CD). METHODS: The primary outcomes were the proportion of CD...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.732240 |
_version_ | 1784577594596786176 |
---|---|
author | Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia Correa Neto, Afonso Nogueira Simões Demetres, Michelle Boguszewski, Cesar Luiz Nogueira, Vania dos Santos Nunes |
author_facet | Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia Correa Neto, Afonso Nogueira Simões Demetres, Michelle Boguszewski, Cesar Luiz Nogueira, Vania dos Santos Nunes |
author_sort | Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pasireotide, cabergoline, ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, and temozolomide for the treatment of Cushing’s disease (CD). METHODS: The primary outcomes were the proportion of CD control, adverse events (AE), and reduction of urinary free cortisol. Search strategies were applied to Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL. Independent reviewers assessed the study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Standardized mean difference was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data (i.e., pre- and post-intervention). Random meta-analyses for the proportion of CD control and AE were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-nine controlled and non-controlled studies were included. No study with temozolomide and levoketoconazole and one study with osilodrostat fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The meta-analyses of proportion of CD control was 35% for cabergoline (95% CI: 27–43%, six studies, 141 participants), 44% for pasireotide (95% CI: 25–35%, eight studies, 522 participants), 41% for ketoconazole (95% CI: 36–46%, six studies, 450 participants), 66% for metyrapone (95% CI: 46–87%, four studies, 66 participants), and of 66.4% for osilodrostat (95% CI: 57.9, 74.3, 97 participants, one study). One study compared two different treatments (cabergoline vs. ketoconazole), and no statistical difference was observed in CD control (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.87, 14 participants, very low certainty of evidence). The most frequent AE associated with pasireotide was hyperglycemia, dizziness and nausea with cabergoline and metyrapone, and elevated transaminases with ketoconazole. CONCLUSION: The superiority of one drug over another could not be determined due to lack of controlled studies, but the proportion of disease control identified in our meta-analysis may support clinical decision. New therapeutic options should be investigated due to the limited efficacy and tolerability of the currently available medical treatment for patients with Cushing’s disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020205567, identifier CRD42020205567. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8485729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84857292021-10-02 Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia Correa Neto, Afonso Nogueira Simões Demetres, Michelle Boguszewski, Cesar Luiz Nogueira, Vania dos Santos Nunes Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pasireotide, cabergoline, ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, and temozolomide for the treatment of Cushing’s disease (CD). METHODS: The primary outcomes were the proportion of CD control, adverse events (AE), and reduction of urinary free cortisol. Search strategies were applied to Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL. Independent reviewers assessed the study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Standardized mean difference was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data (i.e., pre- and post-intervention). Random meta-analyses for the proportion of CD control and AE were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-nine controlled and non-controlled studies were included. No study with temozolomide and levoketoconazole and one study with osilodrostat fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The meta-analyses of proportion of CD control was 35% for cabergoline (95% CI: 27–43%, six studies, 141 participants), 44% for pasireotide (95% CI: 25–35%, eight studies, 522 participants), 41% for ketoconazole (95% CI: 36–46%, six studies, 450 participants), 66% for metyrapone (95% CI: 46–87%, four studies, 66 participants), and of 66.4% for osilodrostat (95% CI: 57.9, 74.3, 97 participants, one study). One study compared two different treatments (cabergoline vs. ketoconazole), and no statistical difference was observed in CD control (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.87, 14 participants, very low certainty of evidence). The most frequent AE associated with pasireotide was hyperglycemia, dizziness and nausea with cabergoline and metyrapone, and elevated transaminases with ketoconazole. CONCLUSION: The superiority of one drug over another could not be determined due to lack of controlled studies, but the proportion of disease control identified in our meta-analysis may support clinical decision. New therapeutic options should be investigated due to the limited efficacy and tolerability of the currently available medical treatment for patients with Cushing’s disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020205567, identifier CRD42020205567. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8485729/ /pubmed/34603209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.732240 Text en Copyright © 2021 Simões Corrêa Galendi, Correa Neto, Demetres, Boguszewski and Nogueira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Simões Corrêa Galendi, Julia Correa Neto, Afonso Nogueira Simões Demetres, Michelle Boguszewski, Cesar Luiz Nogueira, Vania dos Santos Nunes Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of medical treatment of cushing’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.732240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simoescorreagalendijulia effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT correanetoafonsonogueirasimoes effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT demetresmichelle effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT boguszewskicesarluiz effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nogueiravaniadossantosnunes effectivenessofmedicaltreatmentofcushingsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |