Cargando…

Procedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction‐assisted femoral lead extraction in Thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation rate has been increasing worldwide. Despite proper surgical technique and preincisional intravenous antibiotics, the incidence of infected CIED remains high and leads to serious complications. When encountered with CIED infection,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiratham‐Opas, Jirarat, Prasertwitayakij, Narawudt, Nantsupawat, Teerapat, Wongcharoen, Wanwarang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12574
_version_ 1784577608315305984
author Jiratham‐Opas, Jirarat
Prasertwitayakij, Narawudt
Nantsupawat, Teerapat
Wongcharoen, Wanwarang
author_facet Jiratham‐Opas, Jirarat
Prasertwitayakij, Narawudt
Nantsupawat, Teerapat
Wongcharoen, Wanwarang
author_sort Jiratham‐Opas, Jirarat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation rate has been increasing worldwide. Despite proper surgical technique and preincisional intravenous antibiotics, the incidence of infected CIED remains high and leads to serious complications. When encountered with CIED infection, complete CIED system removal is indicated. Several lead extraction approaches have shown a high success rate. However, the facilities are limited in Thailand. In our current practice, we perform lead extraction using the Dotter basket snare femoral approach as our primary method. There are no prior data on this countertraction‐assisted transfemoral technique. Therefore, we aim to study the procedural outcome of countertraction‐assisted transfemoral lead removal technique of CIED infection in Thai patients. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with CIED infection and with a history of device infection were retrospectively included. Simple manual removal was performed. In case of failure, we proceeded with the modified countertraction‐assisted transfemoral technique. RESULTS: There were 35 patients in the study. The success rate was 94.3%. Most of the leads, 62.8%, were removed by simple manual traction. In the 37.1% who required further femoral approach lead extractions, procedural failure was observed in 5.7% and procedure‐related adverse events in 5.6%. CIED infection‐related death accounted for 5.7% and nosocomial infection‐related death, 2.8%. CONCLUSION: The success rate of CIED infection lead explant and countertraction‐assisted transfemoral lead extraction technique was high with small complications and can be performed without advanced facilities. However, the procedure required a main center with a cardiovascular thoracic surgery support team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8485811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84858112021-10-06 Procedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction‐assisted femoral lead extraction in Thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection Jiratham‐Opas, Jirarat Prasertwitayakij, Narawudt Nantsupawat, Teerapat Wongcharoen, Wanwarang J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation rate has been increasing worldwide. Despite proper surgical technique and preincisional intravenous antibiotics, the incidence of infected CIED remains high and leads to serious complications. When encountered with CIED infection, complete CIED system removal is indicated. Several lead extraction approaches have shown a high success rate. However, the facilities are limited in Thailand. In our current practice, we perform lead extraction using the Dotter basket snare femoral approach as our primary method. There are no prior data on this countertraction‐assisted transfemoral technique. Therefore, we aim to study the procedural outcome of countertraction‐assisted transfemoral lead removal technique of CIED infection in Thai patients. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with CIED infection and with a history of device infection were retrospectively included. Simple manual removal was performed. In case of failure, we proceeded with the modified countertraction‐assisted transfemoral technique. RESULTS: There were 35 patients in the study. The success rate was 94.3%. Most of the leads, 62.8%, were removed by simple manual traction. In the 37.1% who required further femoral approach lead extractions, procedural failure was observed in 5.7% and procedure‐related adverse events in 5.6%. CIED infection‐related death accounted for 5.7% and nosocomial infection‐related death, 2.8%. CONCLUSION: The success rate of CIED infection lead explant and countertraction‐assisted transfemoral lead extraction technique was high with small complications and can be performed without advanced facilities. However, the procedure required a main center with a cardiovascular thoracic surgery support team. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8485811/ /pubmed/34621410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12574 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jiratham‐Opas, Jirarat
Prasertwitayakij, Narawudt
Nantsupawat, Teerapat
Wongcharoen, Wanwarang
Procedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction‐assisted femoral lead extraction in Thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection
title Procedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction‐assisted femoral lead extraction in Thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection
title_full Procedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction‐assisted femoral lead extraction in Thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection
title_fullStr Procedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction‐assisted femoral lead extraction in Thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection
title_full_unstemmed Procedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction‐assisted femoral lead extraction in Thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection
title_short Procedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction‐assisted femoral lead extraction in Thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection
title_sort procedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction‐assisted femoral lead extraction in thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12574
work_keys_str_mv AT jirathamopasjirarat proceduraloutcomeofleadexplantandcountertractionassistedfemoralleadextractioninthaipatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceinfection
AT prasertwitayakijnarawudt proceduraloutcomeofleadexplantandcountertractionassistedfemoralleadextractioninthaipatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceinfection
AT nantsupawatteerapat proceduraloutcomeofleadexplantandcountertractionassistedfemoralleadextractioninthaipatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceinfection
AT wongcharoenwanwarang proceduraloutcomeofleadexplantandcountertractionassistedfemoralleadextractioninthaipatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceinfection