Cargando…
Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing emerged as a promising alternative to His bundle (HB) pacing in difficult cases of physiological pacing and failed cases of cardiac resynchronization. So, it is important to understand ECG features of LBB area pacing in various subsets of patients. OB...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12610 |
_version_ | 1784577611248173056 |
---|---|
author | Das, Asit Chatterjeet Das, Suman Mandal, Aniruddha |
author_facet | Das, Asit Chatterjeet Das, Suman Mandal, Aniruddha |
author_sort | Das, Asit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing emerged as a promising alternative to His bundle (HB) pacing in difficult cases of physiological pacing and failed cases of cardiac resynchronization. So, it is important to understand ECG features of LBB area pacing in various subsets of patients. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to find out different morphological patterns and characteristic ECG features of LBB area pacing. METHOD: Medtronic 3830 pacing lead was used to pierce the interventricular septum 1‐2 cm distal towards the RV cavity to a previously placed electrophysiology catheter at distal HB region to reach the LBB area in the right anterior oblique (RAO) 30 degree projection. We observed paced QRS morphology in lead V1 and paced QRS duration. RESULTS: We have analyzed ECG features of 60 patients who had undergone LBB area pacing and 60 patients with RV apical pacing. LBB area pacing resulted in narrower‐paced QRS complex than conventional RV apical pacing. In patients with baseline LBBB QRS shortening from LBB area pacing was more in comparison to patients with RBBB (34.45 ± 8.07 ms vs 19.78 ± 10.24 ms, P value .004). Paced QRS morphological pattern in lead V1 was most commonly qR pattern followed by Qr pattern. CONCLUSIONS: LBB area pacing results in narrower‐paced QRS duration than RV apical pacing. The morphological pattern is most commonly a qR or Qr pattern in lead V1. Patients with baseline RBBB showed lesser paced QRS shortening in comparison to patients with baseline LBBB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8485822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84858222021-10-06 Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features Das, Asit Chatterjeet Das, Suman Mandal, Aniruddha J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing emerged as a promising alternative to His bundle (HB) pacing in difficult cases of physiological pacing and failed cases of cardiac resynchronization. So, it is important to understand ECG features of LBB area pacing in various subsets of patients. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to find out different morphological patterns and characteristic ECG features of LBB area pacing. METHOD: Medtronic 3830 pacing lead was used to pierce the interventricular septum 1‐2 cm distal towards the RV cavity to a previously placed electrophysiology catheter at distal HB region to reach the LBB area in the right anterior oblique (RAO) 30 degree projection. We observed paced QRS morphology in lead V1 and paced QRS duration. RESULTS: We have analyzed ECG features of 60 patients who had undergone LBB area pacing and 60 patients with RV apical pacing. LBB area pacing resulted in narrower‐paced QRS complex than conventional RV apical pacing. In patients with baseline LBBB QRS shortening from LBB area pacing was more in comparison to patients with RBBB (34.45 ± 8.07 ms vs 19.78 ± 10.24 ms, P value .004). Paced QRS morphological pattern in lead V1 was most commonly qR pattern followed by Qr pattern. CONCLUSIONS: LBB area pacing results in narrower‐paced QRS duration than RV apical pacing. The morphological pattern is most commonly a qR or Qr pattern in lead V1. Patients with baseline RBBB showed lesser paced QRS shortening in comparison to patients with baseline LBBB. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8485822/ /pubmed/34621412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12610 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Das, Asit Chatterjeet Das, Suman Mandal, Aniruddha Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features |
title | Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features |
title_full | Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features |
title_fullStr | Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features |
title_full_unstemmed | Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features |
title_short | Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features |
title_sort | left bundle branch area pacing: electrocardiographic features |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasasit leftbundlebranchareapacingelectrocardiographicfeatures AT chatterjeetdassuman leftbundlebranchareapacingelectrocardiographicfeatures AT mandalaniruddha leftbundlebranchareapacingelectrocardiographicfeatures |