Cargando…

Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing emerged as a promising alternative to His bundle (HB) pacing in difficult cases of physiological pacing and failed cases of cardiac resynchronization. So, it is important to understand ECG features of LBB area pacing in various subsets of patients. OB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Asit, Chatterjeet Das, Suman, Mandal, Aniruddha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12610
_version_ 1784577611248173056
author Das, Asit
Chatterjeet Das, Suman
Mandal, Aniruddha
author_facet Das, Asit
Chatterjeet Das, Suman
Mandal, Aniruddha
author_sort Das, Asit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing emerged as a promising alternative to His bundle (HB) pacing in difficult cases of physiological pacing and failed cases of cardiac resynchronization. So, it is important to understand ECG features of LBB area pacing in various subsets of patients. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to find out different morphological patterns and characteristic ECG features of LBB area pacing. METHOD: Medtronic 3830 pacing lead was used to pierce the interventricular septum 1‐2 cm distal towards the RV cavity to a previously placed electrophysiology catheter at distal HB region to reach the LBB area in the right anterior oblique (RAO) 30 degree projection. We observed paced QRS morphology in lead V1 and paced QRS duration. RESULTS: We have analyzed ECG features of 60 patients who had undergone LBB area pacing and 60 patients with RV apical pacing. LBB area pacing resulted in narrower‐paced QRS complex than conventional RV apical pacing. In patients with baseline LBBB QRS shortening from LBB area pacing was more in comparison to patients with RBBB (34.45 ± 8.07 ms vs 19.78 ± 10.24 ms, P value .004). Paced QRS morphological pattern in lead V1 was most commonly qR pattern followed by Qr pattern. CONCLUSIONS: LBB area pacing results in narrower‐paced QRS duration than RV apical pacing. The morphological pattern is most commonly a qR or Qr pattern in lead V1. Patients with baseline RBBB showed lesser paced QRS shortening in comparison to patients with baseline LBBB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8485822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84858222021-10-06 Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features Das, Asit Chatterjeet Das, Suman Mandal, Aniruddha J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing emerged as a promising alternative to His bundle (HB) pacing in difficult cases of physiological pacing and failed cases of cardiac resynchronization. So, it is important to understand ECG features of LBB area pacing in various subsets of patients. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to find out different morphological patterns and characteristic ECG features of LBB area pacing. METHOD: Medtronic 3830 pacing lead was used to pierce the interventricular septum 1‐2 cm distal towards the RV cavity to a previously placed electrophysiology catheter at distal HB region to reach the LBB area in the right anterior oblique (RAO) 30 degree projection. We observed paced QRS morphology in lead V1 and paced QRS duration. RESULTS: We have analyzed ECG features of 60 patients who had undergone LBB area pacing and 60 patients with RV apical pacing. LBB area pacing resulted in narrower‐paced QRS complex than conventional RV apical pacing. In patients with baseline LBBB QRS shortening from LBB area pacing was more in comparison to patients with RBBB (34.45 ± 8.07 ms vs 19.78 ± 10.24 ms, P value .004). Paced QRS morphological pattern in lead V1 was most commonly qR pattern followed by Qr pattern. CONCLUSIONS: LBB area pacing results in narrower‐paced QRS duration than RV apical pacing. The morphological pattern is most commonly a qR or Qr pattern in lead V1. Patients with baseline RBBB showed lesser paced QRS shortening in comparison to patients with baseline LBBB. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8485822/ /pubmed/34621412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12610 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Das, Asit
Chatterjeet Das, Suman
Mandal, Aniruddha
Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
title Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
title_full Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
title_fullStr Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
title_full_unstemmed Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
title_short Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
title_sort left bundle branch area pacing: electrocardiographic features
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12610
work_keys_str_mv AT dasasit leftbundlebranchareapacingelectrocardiographicfeatures
AT chatterjeetdassuman leftbundlebranchareapacingelectrocardiographicfeatures
AT mandalaniruddha leftbundlebranchareapacingelectrocardiographicfeatures