Balancing Pragmatism and Sustainability: A Case Study of an Interorganisational Network to Improve Integrated Care for the Elderly

INTRODUCTION: Networks constitute a promising strategy for interorganisational collaboration, but may fail due to network tensions. By investigating the activities and internal dynamics of a voluntary meso-level network operating in the intersection of health and social care, this study aims to enhance the understanding of the relationship between pragmatism and sustainability and the role network governance plays in this respect. METHODS: In this descriptive case study, 2–3 researchers observed 3 three-hour long network meetings during the course of a year, and four complementary interviews were performed. Data were analysed based on the literature on network functioning and effectiveness. RESULTS: Pragmatism (a focus on ‘getting things done’) was more emphasised than sustainability although the network meetings also contained elements of relationship- and trust-building. The network leadership (a Network Administrative Organisation, NAO) created structure and concretized the participants’ ideas while remaining flexible and perceptive, and also carried out tasks which would otherwise not have been performed. DISCUSSION: The emphasis on pragmatism did not seem to influence sustainability negatively which has been pointed out as a potential risk in previous literature. Rather, the focus on pragmatism reinforced sustainability in a way that is similar to what has been described in prior research as a “trust-building loop” and discussed further in terms of a “perception of progress” mechanism. However, it was unclear what future the voluntary network would have without the NAO. CONCLUSION: Network governance is instrumental to success, and should be carefully considered when initiating interorganisational network initiatives for integrated care.