Cargando…

Individual Postprandial Glycemic Responses to Diet in n-of-1 Trials: Westlake N-of-1 Trials for Macronutrient Intake (WE-MACNUTR)

BACKGROUND: The role of different types and quantities of macronutrients on human health has been controversial, and the individual response to dietary macronutrient intake needs more investigation. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to use an ‘n-of-1’ study design to investigate the individual variability in pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yue, Fu, Yuanqing, Tian, Yunyi, Gou, Wanglong, Miao, Zelei, Yang, Min, Ordovás, José M, Zheng, Ju-Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxab227
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The role of different types and quantities of macronutrients on human health has been controversial, and the individual response to dietary macronutrient intake needs more investigation. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to use an ‘n-of-1’ study design to investigate the individual variability in postprandial glycemic response when eating diets with different macronutrient distributions among apparently healthy adults. METHODS: Thirty apparently healthy young Chinese adults (women, 68%) aged between 22 and 34 y, with BMI between 17.2 and 31.9 kg/m(2), were provided with high-fat, low-carbohydrate (HF-LC, 60–70% fat, 15–25% carbohydrate, 15% protein, of total energy) and low-fat, high-carbohydrate (LF-HC, 10–20% fat, 65–75% carbohydrate, 15% protein) diets, for 6 d wearing continuous glucose monitoring systems, respectively, in a randomized sequence, interspersed by a 6-d wash-out period. Three cycles were conducted. The primary outcomes were the differences of maximum postprandial glucose (MPG), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and AUC(24) between intervention periods of LF-HC and HF-LC diets. A Bayesian model was used to predict responders with the posterior probability of any 1 of the 3 outcomes reaching a clinically meaningful difference. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants were included in the analysis. Posterior probability of reaching a clinically meaningful difference of MPG (0.167 mmol/L), MAGE (0.072 mmol/L), and AUC(24) (13.889 mmol/L·h) between LF-HC and HF-LC diets varied among participants, and those with posterior probability >80% were identified as high-carbohydrate responders (n = 9) or high-fat responders (n = 6). Analyses of the Bayesian-aggregated n-of-1 trials among all participants showed a relatively low posterior probability of reaching a clinically meaningful difference of the 3 outcomes between LF-HC and HF-LC diets. CONCLUSIONS: N-of-1 trials are feasible to characterize personal response to dietary intervention in young Chinese adults.