Cargando…
Barrett’s Epithelium to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Is There a “Point of No Return”?
Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) arises from Barrett’s epithelium (BE), and chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease is considered the strongest risk factor for disease progression. All BE patients undergo acid suppressive therapy, surveillance, and BE removal by surgery or endoscopic ablat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.706706 |
_version_ | 1784577634576891904 |
---|---|
author | Panda, Anshuman Shin, Mi ryung Cheng, Christina Bajpai, Manisha |
author_facet | Panda, Anshuman Shin, Mi ryung Cheng, Christina Bajpai, Manisha |
author_sort | Panda, Anshuman |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) arises from Barrett’s epithelium (BE), and chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease is considered the strongest risk factor for disease progression. All BE patients undergo acid suppressive therapy, surveillance, and BE removal by surgery or endoscopic ablation, yet the incidence of EAC continues to increase. Despite the known side effects and mortality, the one-size-fits-all approach is the standard clinical management as there are no reliable methods for risk stratification. Methods: Paired-end Illumina NextSeq500 RNA sequencing was performed on total RNA extracted from 20-week intervals (0, 20, 40, and 60 W) of an in vitro BE carcinogenesis (BEC) model to construct time series global gene expression patterns (GEPs). The cells from two strategic time points (20 and 40 W) based on the GEPs were grown for another 20 weeks, with and without further acid and bile salt (ABS) stimulation, and the recurrent neoplastic cell phenotypes were evaluated. Results: Hierarchical clustering of 866 genes with ≥ twofold change in transcript levels across the four time points revealed maximum variation between the BEC20W and BEC40W cells. Enrichment analysis confirmed that the genes altered ≥ twofold during this window period associated with carcinogenesis and malignancy. Intriguingly, the BEC20W cells required further ABS exposure to gain neoplastic changes, but the BEC40W cells progressed to malignant transformation after 20 weeks even in the absence of additional ABS. Discussion: The transcriptomic gene expression patterns in the BEC model demonstrate evidence of a clear threshold in the progression of BE to malignancy. Catastrophic transcriptomic changes during a window period culminate in the commitment of the BE cells to a “point of no return,” and removal of ABS is not effective in preventing their malignant transformation. Discerning this “point of no return” during BE surveillance by tracking the GEPs has the potential to evaluate risk of BE progression and enable personalized clinical management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8485939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84859392021-10-02 Barrett’s Epithelium to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Is There a “Point of No Return”? Panda, Anshuman Shin, Mi ryung Cheng, Christina Bajpai, Manisha Front Genet Genetics Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) arises from Barrett’s epithelium (BE), and chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease is considered the strongest risk factor for disease progression. All BE patients undergo acid suppressive therapy, surveillance, and BE removal by surgery or endoscopic ablation, yet the incidence of EAC continues to increase. Despite the known side effects and mortality, the one-size-fits-all approach is the standard clinical management as there are no reliable methods for risk stratification. Methods: Paired-end Illumina NextSeq500 RNA sequencing was performed on total RNA extracted from 20-week intervals (0, 20, 40, and 60 W) of an in vitro BE carcinogenesis (BEC) model to construct time series global gene expression patterns (GEPs). The cells from two strategic time points (20 and 40 W) based on the GEPs were grown for another 20 weeks, with and without further acid and bile salt (ABS) stimulation, and the recurrent neoplastic cell phenotypes were evaluated. Results: Hierarchical clustering of 866 genes with ≥ twofold change in transcript levels across the four time points revealed maximum variation between the BEC20W and BEC40W cells. Enrichment analysis confirmed that the genes altered ≥ twofold during this window period associated with carcinogenesis and malignancy. Intriguingly, the BEC20W cells required further ABS exposure to gain neoplastic changes, but the BEC40W cells progressed to malignant transformation after 20 weeks even in the absence of additional ABS. Discussion: The transcriptomic gene expression patterns in the BEC model demonstrate evidence of a clear threshold in the progression of BE to malignancy. Catastrophic transcriptomic changes during a window period culminate in the commitment of the BE cells to a “point of no return,” and removal of ABS is not effective in preventing their malignant transformation. Discerning this “point of no return” during BE surveillance by tracking the GEPs has the potential to evaluate risk of BE progression and enable personalized clinical management. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8485939/ /pubmed/34603373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.706706 Text en Copyright © 2021 Panda, Shin, Cheng and Bajpai. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Panda, Anshuman Shin, Mi ryung Cheng, Christina Bajpai, Manisha Barrett’s Epithelium to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Is There a “Point of No Return”? |
title | Barrett’s Epithelium to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Is There a “Point of No Return”? |
title_full | Barrett’s Epithelium to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Is There a “Point of No Return”? |
title_fullStr | Barrett’s Epithelium to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Is There a “Point of No Return”? |
title_full_unstemmed | Barrett’s Epithelium to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Is There a “Point of No Return”? |
title_short | Barrett’s Epithelium to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Is There a “Point of No Return”? |
title_sort | barrett’s epithelium to esophageal adenocarcinoma: is there a “point of no return”? |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.706706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pandaanshuman barrettsepitheliumtoesophagealadenocarcinomaisthereapointofnoreturn AT shinmiryung barrettsepitheliumtoesophagealadenocarcinomaisthereapointofnoreturn AT chengchristina barrettsepitheliumtoesophagealadenocarcinomaisthereapointofnoreturn AT bajpaimanisha barrettsepitheliumtoesophagealadenocarcinomaisthereapointofnoreturn |