Cargando…

Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke’s Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation

OBJECTIVE: Clinically, the foot posture index-6 (FPI-6) and Clarke’s angle (CA) are widely utilized to assess static foot posture; however, due to scarcity of scientific evidence, clinicians continue to debate the validity and diagnostic accuracy of these measures in children and adolescents. This s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegazy, Fatma, Aboelnasr, Emad, Abuzaid, Mohamed, Kim, In-Ju, Salem, Yasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611407
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S317439
_version_ 1784577649392222208
author Hegazy, Fatma
Aboelnasr, Emad
Abuzaid, Mohamed
Kim, In-Ju
Salem, Yasser
author_facet Hegazy, Fatma
Aboelnasr, Emad
Abuzaid, Mohamed
Kim, In-Ju
Salem, Yasser
author_sort Hegazy, Fatma
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Clinically, the foot posture index-6 (FPI-6) and Clarke’s angle (CA) are widely utilized to assess static foot posture; however, due to scarcity of scientific evidence, clinicians continue to debate the validity and diagnostic accuracy of these measures in children and adolescents. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the FPI-6 and CA in determining adolescents’ flexible flatfoot between ages of 12 and 18 years, considering radiographic investigation as a reference standard measure. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Governmental hospitals. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A sample of 460 people (920 feet) with flexible flatfoot between the ages of 12 and 18 (15.23 ± 0.84 years) was enrolled in the study. The findings of the investigated measures were compared to the reference standard radiographic measure and plotted on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was determined as a measure of FPI-6 and CA diagnostic accuracy. Intra-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of FPI-6 and CA were calculated and compared. The post-test probability of flatfoot was determined using the Fagan nomogram. RESULTS: CA had a substantially higher intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.99) than the FPI-6 (ICC=0.96), with p-value of 0.001. CA has greater sensitivity (98%) than FPI-6, as well as a superior specificity (99%), positive predictive value (98%), negative predictive value (98.9%), positive likelihood ratio (97), and a lower negative likelihood ratio (0.02). CA had such an area under ROC curve of 0.98 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.95–1.00, while FPI-6 had an area under ROC curve of 0.80 with a 95% confidence interval of (0.77–0.85). CONCLUSION: FPI-6 and Clarke’s angle are both valid and diagnostically accurate clinical tests for flatfoot detection, with Clarke’s angle outperforming FPI-6 in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years with a normal BMI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8486009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84860092021-10-04 Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke’s Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation Hegazy, Fatma Aboelnasr, Emad Abuzaid, Mohamed Kim, In-Ju Salem, Yasser J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research OBJECTIVE: Clinically, the foot posture index-6 (FPI-6) and Clarke’s angle (CA) are widely utilized to assess static foot posture; however, due to scarcity of scientific evidence, clinicians continue to debate the validity and diagnostic accuracy of these measures in children and adolescents. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the FPI-6 and CA in determining adolescents’ flexible flatfoot between ages of 12 and 18 years, considering radiographic investigation as a reference standard measure. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Governmental hospitals. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A sample of 460 people (920 feet) with flexible flatfoot between the ages of 12 and 18 (15.23 ± 0.84 years) was enrolled in the study. The findings of the investigated measures were compared to the reference standard radiographic measure and plotted on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was determined as a measure of FPI-6 and CA diagnostic accuracy. Intra-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of FPI-6 and CA were calculated and compared. The post-test probability of flatfoot was determined using the Fagan nomogram. RESULTS: CA had a substantially higher intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.99) than the FPI-6 (ICC=0.96), with p-value of 0.001. CA has greater sensitivity (98%) than FPI-6, as well as a superior specificity (99%), positive predictive value (98%), negative predictive value (98.9%), positive likelihood ratio (97), and a lower negative likelihood ratio (0.02). CA had such an area under ROC curve of 0.98 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.95–1.00, while FPI-6 had an area under ROC curve of 0.80 with a 95% confidence interval of (0.77–0.85). CONCLUSION: FPI-6 and Clarke’s angle are both valid and diagnostically accurate clinical tests for flatfoot detection, with Clarke’s angle outperforming FPI-6 in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years with a normal BMI. Dove 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8486009/ /pubmed/34611407 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S317439 Text en © 2021 Hegazy et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hegazy, Fatma
Aboelnasr, Emad
Abuzaid, Mohamed
Kim, In-Ju
Salem, Yasser
Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke’s Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation
title Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke’s Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation
title_full Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke’s Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation
title_fullStr Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke’s Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke’s Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation
title_short Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke’s Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation
title_sort comparing validity and diagnostic accuracy of clarke’s angle and foot posture index-6 to determine flexible flatfoot in adolescents: a cross-sectional investigation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611407
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S317439
work_keys_str_mv AT hegazyfatma comparingvalidityanddiagnosticaccuracyofclarkesangleandfootpostureindex6todetermineflexibleflatfootinadolescentsacrosssectionalinvestigation
AT aboelnasremad comparingvalidityanddiagnosticaccuracyofclarkesangleandfootpostureindex6todetermineflexibleflatfootinadolescentsacrosssectionalinvestigation
AT abuzaidmohamed comparingvalidityanddiagnosticaccuracyofclarkesangleandfootpostureindex6todetermineflexibleflatfootinadolescentsacrosssectionalinvestigation
AT kiminju comparingvalidityanddiagnosticaccuracyofclarkesangleandfootpostureindex6todetermineflexibleflatfootinadolescentsacrosssectionalinvestigation
AT salemyasser comparingvalidityanddiagnosticaccuracyofclarkesangleandfootpostureindex6todetermineflexibleflatfootinadolescentsacrosssectionalinvestigation