Cargando…

Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To describe and compare the histological changes in the cut edges of the remaining donor corneal rim using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty (FAK) versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) via light and transmission electron microscopic examination. METHODS: This was a prospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tolba, Mohamed Y., Zaki, Iman M. A., Raafat, Karim A., Dib, Amr A. Al, Eleiwa, Taher, Chase, Collin, Taher, Ibrahim M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667932
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.325785
_version_ 1784577653649440768
author Tolba, Mohamed Y.
Zaki, Iman M. A.
Raafat, Karim A.
Dib, Amr A. Al
Eleiwa, Taher
Chase, Collin
Taher, Ibrahim M.
author_facet Tolba, Mohamed Y.
Zaki, Iman M. A.
Raafat, Karim A.
Dib, Amr A. Al
Eleiwa, Taher
Chase, Collin
Taher, Ibrahim M.
author_sort Tolba, Mohamed Y.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To describe and compare the histological changes in the cut edges of the remaining donor corneal rim using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty (FAK) versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) via light and transmission electron microscopic examination. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 10 eyes; 5 FAK (top-hat technique) and 5 conventional PK. Main outcomes were histological findings at the cut edge of the donor corneal rim (at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock). RESULTS: Cellular and ultra-cellular changes in the form of stromal edema, disorganized collagen fibers, and nuclear changes were more prominent in the FAK eyes as compared to the conventional PK ones. CONCLUSION: FAK induces more collateral damage in the cut edge of corneal donor graft at cellular and ultra-cellular levels, compared to conventional trephination. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical ramifications of this observation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8486028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84860282021-10-18 Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty Tolba, Mohamed Y. Zaki, Iman M. A. Raafat, Karim A. Dib, Amr A. Al Eleiwa, Taher Chase, Collin Taher, Ibrahim M. Saudi J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To describe and compare the histological changes in the cut edges of the remaining donor corneal rim using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty (FAK) versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) via light and transmission electron microscopic examination. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 10 eyes; 5 FAK (top-hat technique) and 5 conventional PK. Main outcomes were histological findings at the cut edge of the donor corneal rim (at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock). RESULTS: Cellular and ultra-cellular changes in the form of stromal edema, disorganized collagen fibers, and nuclear changes were more prominent in the FAK eyes as compared to the conventional PK ones. CONCLUSION: FAK induces more collateral damage in the cut edge of corneal donor graft at cellular and ultra-cellular levels, compared to conventional trephination. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical ramifications of this observation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8486028/ /pubmed/34667932 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.325785 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tolba, Mohamed Y.
Zaki, Iman M. A.
Raafat, Karim A.
Dib, Amr A. Al
Eleiwa, Taher
Chase, Collin
Taher, Ibrahim M.
Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty
title Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty
title_full Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty
title_fullStr Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty
title_short Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty
title_sort electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667932
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.325785
work_keys_str_mv AT tolbamohamedy electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty
AT zakiimanma electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty
AT raafatkarima electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty
AT dibamraal electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty
AT eleiwataher electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty
AT chasecollin electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty
AT taheribrahimm electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty