Cargando…
Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty
PURPOSE: To describe and compare the histological changes in the cut edges of the remaining donor corneal rim using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty (FAK) versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) via light and transmission electron microscopic examination. METHODS: This was a prospec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667932 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.325785 |
_version_ | 1784577653649440768 |
---|---|
author | Tolba, Mohamed Y. Zaki, Iman M. A. Raafat, Karim A. Dib, Amr A. Al Eleiwa, Taher Chase, Collin Taher, Ibrahim M. |
author_facet | Tolba, Mohamed Y. Zaki, Iman M. A. Raafat, Karim A. Dib, Amr A. Al Eleiwa, Taher Chase, Collin Taher, Ibrahim M. |
author_sort | Tolba, Mohamed Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To describe and compare the histological changes in the cut edges of the remaining donor corneal rim using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty (FAK) versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) via light and transmission electron microscopic examination. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 10 eyes; 5 FAK (top-hat technique) and 5 conventional PK. Main outcomes were histological findings at the cut edge of the donor corneal rim (at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock). RESULTS: Cellular and ultra-cellular changes in the form of stromal edema, disorganized collagen fibers, and nuclear changes were more prominent in the FAK eyes as compared to the conventional PK ones. CONCLUSION: FAK induces more collateral damage in the cut edge of corneal donor graft at cellular and ultra-cellular levels, compared to conventional trephination. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical ramifications of this observation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8486028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84860282021-10-18 Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty Tolba, Mohamed Y. Zaki, Iman M. A. Raafat, Karim A. Dib, Amr A. Al Eleiwa, Taher Chase, Collin Taher, Ibrahim M. Saudi J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To describe and compare the histological changes in the cut edges of the remaining donor corneal rim using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty (FAK) versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) via light and transmission electron microscopic examination. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 10 eyes; 5 FAK (top-hat technique) and 5 conventional PK. Main outcomes were histological findings at the cut edge of the donor corneal rim (at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock). RESULTS: Cellular and ultra-cellular changes in the form of stromal edema, disorganized collagen fibers, and nuclear changes were more prominent in the FAK eyes as compared to the conventional PK ones. CONCLUSION: FAK induces more collateral damage in the cut edge of corneal donor graft at cellular and ultra-cellular levels, compared to conventional trephination. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical ramifications of this observation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8486028/ /pubmed/34667932 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.325785 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tolba, Mohamed Y. Zaki, Iman M. A. Raafat, Karim A. Dib, Amr A. Al Eleiwa, Taher Chase, Collin Taher, Ibrahim M. Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty |
title | Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty |
title_full | Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty |
title_fullStr | Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty |
title_short | Electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty |
title_sort | electron microscopic comparison of the donor cut edges using femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional keratoplasty |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667932 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.325785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tolbamohamedy electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty AT zakiimanma electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty AT raafatkarima electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty AT dibamraal electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty AT eleiwataher electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty AT chasecollin electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty AT taheribrahimm electronmicroscopiccomparisonofthedonorcutedgesusingfemtosecondlaserassistedkeratoplastyversusconventionalkeratoplasty |