Cargando…
Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetric factors associated with hysterotomy extension among women undergoing a second-stage cesarean. STUDY DESIGN: This 5-year retrospective cohort study (2013–2017) included all women with second-stage cesarean deliveries of live-born singleton fetuses in cephalic presentati...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34597319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258049 |
_version_ | 1784577668502519808 |
---|---|
author | Merrer, Jade Dreyfus, Clara Girault, Aude Goffinet, François Le Ray, Camille |
author_facet | Merrer, Jade Dreyfus, Clara Girault, Aude Goffinet, François Le Ray, Camille |
author_sort | Merrer, Jade |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetric factors associated with hysterotomy extension among women undergoing a second-stage cesarean. STUDY DESIGN: This 5-year retrospective cohort study (2013–2017) included all women with second-stage cesarean deliveries of live-born singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation at term. It took place at a tertiary center that practices delayed pushing. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to assess the maternal, obstetric, and neonatal factors associated with hysterotomy extension mentioned in the surgical report. Operative time, postpartum hemorrhage, and maternal complications were also studied. RESULTS: Of the 3350 intrapartum cesareans, 2637 were performed at term for singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation: 747 (28.3%) during the second stage of labor, 83 (11.1%) of which were complicated by a hysterotomy extension. The median duration of the passive phase of the second stage did not differ between women with and without an extension (164 min versus 160 min, P = 0.85). No other second-stage obstetric characteristics, i.e., duration of the active phase, fetal head station, or fetal malposition, were associated with the risk of extension. Factors significantly associated with extension were the surgeon’s experience and forceps use during the cesarean. Women with an extension, compared to women without one, had a longer median operative time (49 min versus 32 min, P<0.001) and higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage and blood transfusion (respectively, 30.1% versus 15.1%, p = 0.002 and 7.2% versus 2.4%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The risk of a hysterotomy extension does not appear to be associated with second-stage obstetric characteristics, including the duration of the passive phase of this stage. In our center, which practices delayed pushing, prolonging this passive phase beyond 2 hours does not increase the risk of hysterotomy extension in second-stage cesareans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8486087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84860872021-10-02 Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean? Merrer, Jade Dreyfus, Clara Girault, Aude Goffinet, François Le Ray, Camille PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetric factors associated with hysterotomy extension among women undergoing a second-stage cesarean. STUDY DESIGN: This 5-year retrospective cohort study (2013–2017) included all women with second-stage cesarean deliveries of live-born singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation at term. It took place at a tertiary center that practices delayed pushing. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to assess the maternal, obstetric, and neonatal factors associated with hysterotomy extension mentioned in the surgical report. Operative time, postpartum hemorrhage, and maternal complications were also studied. RESULTS: Of the 3350 intrapartum cesareans, 2637 were performed at term for singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation: 747 (28.3%) during the second stage of labor, 83 (11.1%) of which were complicated by a hysterotomy extension. The median duration of the passive phase of the second stage did not differ between women with and without an extension (164 min versus 160 min, P = 0.85). No other second-stage obstetric characteristics, i.e., duration of the active phase, fetal head station, or fetal malposition, were associated with the risk of extension. Factors significantly associated with extension were the surgeon’s experience and forceps use during the cesarean. Women with an extension, compared to women without one, had a longer median operative time (49 min versus 32 min, P<0.001) and higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage and blood transfusion (respectively, 30.1% versus 15.1%, p = 0.002 and 7.2% versus 2.4%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The risk of a hysterotomy extension does not appear to be associated with second-stage obstetric characteristics, including the duration of the passive phase of this stage. In our center, which practices delayed pushing, prolonging this passive phase beyond 2 hours does not increase the risk of hysterotomy extension in second-stage cesareans. Public Library of Science 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8486087/ /pubmed/34597319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258049 Text en © 2021 Merrer et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Merrer, Jade Dreyfus, Clara Girault, Aude Goffinet, François Le Ray, Camille Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean? |
title | Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean? |
title_full | Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean? |
title_fullStr | Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean? |
title_short | Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean? |
title_sort | is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34597319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merrerjade isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean AT dreyfusclara isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean AT giraultaude isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean AT goffinetfrancois isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean AT leraycamille isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean |