Cargando…

Laparoscopic Excision of Patent Processus Vaginalis for Pediatric Hydroceles

Background The standard surgical practice for pediatric hydrocele is resection and ligation of the patent processus vaginalis (PPV). Non-ligation of PPV for pediatric hydrocele is another possibility that can be repaired laparoscopically. Material & methods A retrospective study was undertaken o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Banieghbal, Behrouz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646588
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18416
Descripción
Sumario:Background The standard surgical practice for pediatric hydrocele is resection and ligation of the patent processus vaginalis (PPV). Non-ligation of PPV for pediatric hydrocele is another possibility that can be repaired laparoscopically. Material & methods A retrospective study was undertaken over 10 years (Jan 2011-Feb 2020), of a case series of boys with hydroceles that underwent laparoscopic PPV (Lap PPV) excision. Exclusion criteria were for parents who requested open surgery (10 cases) or an omental plug noted at the PPV site during laparoscopy (one case). Laparoscopic PPV excision was performed via a transperitoneal approach. Results There were 43 cases of Lap PP excision, including three recurrences after open surgery. There were no conversions, complications, or recurrences in any patients. The average operative time for unilateral cases was 21 mins (range 15-30 mins). Three concurrent contra-lateral hydroceles were noted and resected during the primary procedure. Time to regular activity was within one day. There was no visible scar or recurrence after Lap PPV at six months post-surgery review. Conclusion Lap PPV excision appears to be at least equivalent to the “open and ligation” approach. During laparoscopy, both internal rings are assessed for a PPV. By avoiding an inguinal incision(s), a better cosmetic result is possible. It is conceivably safer than open surgery in recurrent cases.