Cargando…

Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to visualize and diagnose soft tissues. Hearing implant (HI) recipients are likely to require at least one MRI scan during their lifetime. However, the MRI scanner can interact with the implant magnet, resulting in complications for the HI reci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Heyning, Paul, Mertens, Griet, Topsakal, Vedat, de Brito, Ruben, Wimmer, Wilhelm, Caversaccio, Marco D., Dazert, Stefan, Volkenstein, Stefan, Zernotti, Mario, Parnes, Lorne S., Staecker, Hinrich, Bruce, Iain A., Rajan, Gunesh, Atlas, Marcus, Friedland, Peter, Skarzynski, Piotr H., Sugarova, Serafima, Kuzovkov, Vladislav, Hagr, Abdulrahman, Mlynski, Robert, Schmutzhard, Joachim, Usami, Shin-Ichi, Lassaletta, Luis, Gavilán, Javier, Godey, Benoit, Raine, Christopher H., Hagen, Rudolf, Sprinzl, Georg M., Brown, Kevin, Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter, Karltorp, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06525-3
_version_ 1784577802078519296
author van de Heyning, Paul
Mertens, Griet
Topsakal, Vedat
de Brito, Ruben
Wimmer, Wilhelm
Caversaccio, Marco D.
Dazert, Stefan
Volkenstein, Stefan
Zernotti, Mario
Parnes, Lorne S.
Staecker, Hinrich
Bruce, Iain A.
Rajan, Gunesh
Atlas, Marcus
Friedland, Peter
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
Sugarova, Serafima
Kuzovkov, Vladislav
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Mlynski, Robert
Schmutzhard, Joachim
Usami, Shin-Ichi
Lassaletta, Luis
Gavilán, Javier
Godey, Benoit
Raine, Christopher H.
Hagen, Rudolf
Sprinzl, Georg M.
Brown, Kevin
Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
Karltorp, Eva
author_facet van de Heyning, Paul
Mertens, Griet
Topsakal, Vedat
de Brito, Ruben
Wimmer, Wilhelm
Caversaccio, Marco D.
Dazert, Stefan
Volkenstein, Stefan
Zernotti, Mario
Parnes, Lorne S.
Staecker, Hinrich
Bruce, Iain A.
Rajan, Gunesh
Atlas, Marcus
Friedland, Peter
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
Sugarova, Serafima
Kuzovkov, Vladislav
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Mlynski, Robert
Schmutzhard, Joachim
Usami, Shin-Ichi
Lassaletta, Luis
Gavilán, Javier
Godey, Benoit
Raine, Christopher H.
Hagen, Rudolf
Sprinzl, Georg M.
Brown, Kevin
Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
Karltorp, Eva
author_sort van de Heyning, Paul
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to visualize and diagnose soft tissues. Hearing implant (HI) recipients are likely to require at least one MRI scan during their lifetime. However, the MRI scanner can interact with the implant magnet, resulting in complications for the HI recipient. This survey, which was conducted in two phases, aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of MRI scans for individuals with a HI manufactured by MED-EL (MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). METHODS: A survey was developed and distributed in two phases to HEARRING clinics to obtain information about the use of MRI for recipients of MED-EL devices. Phase 1 focused on how often MRI is used in diagnostic imaging of the head region of the cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Phase 2 collected safety information about MRI scans performed on HI recipients. RESULTS: 106 of the 126 MRI scans reported in this survey were performed at a field strength of 1.5 T, on HI recipients who wore the SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI. The head and spine were the most frequently imaged regions. 123 of the 126 scans were performed without any complications; two HI recipients experienced discomfort/pain. One recipient required reimplantation after an MRI was performed using a scanner that had not been approved for that implant. There was only one case that required surgical removal of the implant to reduce the imaging artefact. CONCLUSION: Individuals with either a SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI from MED-EL can safely undergo a 1.5 T MRI when it is performed according to the manufacturer’s safety policies and procedures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-020-06525-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8486706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84867062021-10-04 Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients van de Heyning, Paul Mertens, Griet Topsakal, Vedat de Brito, Ruben Wimmer, Wilhelm Caversaccio, Marco D. Dazert, Stefan Volkenstein, Stefan Zernotti, Mario Parnes, Lorne S. Staecker, Hinrich Bruce, Iain A. Rajan, Gunesh Atlas, Marcus Friedland, Peter Skarzynski, Piotr H. Sugarova, Serafima Kuzovkov, Vladislav Hagr, Abdulrahman Mlynski, Robert Schmutzhard, Joachim Usami, Shin-Ichi Lassaletta, Luis Gavilán, Javier Godey, Benoit Raine, Christopher H. Hagen, Rudolf Sprinzl, Georg M. Brown, Kevin Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter Karltorp, Eva Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to visualize and diagnose soft tissues. Hearing implant (HI) recipients are likely to require at least one MRI scan during their lifetime. However, the MRI scanner can interact with the implant magnet, resulting in complications for the HI recipient. This survey, which was conducted in two phases, aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of MRI scans for individuals with a HI manufactured by MED-EL (MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). METHODS: A survey was developed and distributed in two phases to HEARRING clinics to obtain information about the use of MRI for recipients of MED-EL devices. Phase 1 focused on how often MRI is used in diagnostic imaging of the head region of the cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Phase 2 collected safety information about MRI scans performed on HI recipients. RESULTS: 106 of the 126 MRI scans reported in this survey were performed at a field strength of 1.5 T, on HI recipients who wore the SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI. The head and spine were the most frequently imaged regions. 123 of the 126 scans were performed without any complications; two HI recipients experienced discomfort/pain. One recipient required reimplantation after an MRI was performed using a scanner that had not been approved for that implant. There was only one case that required surgical removal of the implant to reduce the imaging artefact. CONCLUSION: Individuals with either a SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI from MED-EL can safely undergo a 1.5 T MRI when it is performed according to the manufacturer’s safety policies and procedures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-020-06525-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8486706/ /pubmed/33788034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06525-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
van de Heyning, Paul
Mertens, Griet
Topsakal, Vedat
de Brito, Ruben
Wimmer, Wilhelm
Caversaccio, Marco D.
Dazert, Stefan
Volkenstein, Stefan
Zernotti, Mario
Parnes, Lorne S.
Staecker, Hinrich
Bruce, Iain A.
Rajan, Gunesh
Atlas, Marcus
Friedland, Peter
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
Sugarova, Serafima
Kuzovkov, Vladislav
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Mlynski, Robert
Schmutzhard, Joachim
Usami, Shin-Ichi
Lassaletta, Luis
Gavilán, Javier
Godey, Benoit
Raine, Christopher H.
Hagen, Rudolf
Sprinzl, Georg M.
Brown, Kevin
Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
Karltorp, Eva
Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients
title Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients
title_full Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients
title_fullStr Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients
title_short Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients
title_sort two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of mri for hearing implant recipients
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06525-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeheyningpaul twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT mertensgriet twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT topsakalvedat twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT debritoruben twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT wimmerwilhelm twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT caversacciomarcod twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT dazertstefan twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT volkensteinstefan twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT zernottimario twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT parneslornes twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT staeckerhinrich twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT bruceiaina twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT rajangunesh twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT atlasmarcus twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT friedlandpeter twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT skarzynskipiotrh twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT sugarovaserafima twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT kuzovkovvladislav twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT hagrabdulrahman twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT mlynskirobert twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT schmutzhardjoachim twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT usamishinichi twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT lassalettaluis twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT gavilanjavier twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT godeybenoit twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT rainechristopherh twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT hagenrudolf twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT sprinzlgeorgm twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT brownkevin twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT baumgartnerwolfdieter twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients
AT karltorpeva twophasesurveyonthefrequencyofuseandsafetyofmriforhearingimplantrecipients