Cargando…

Comparison of a Lateral Flow Assay and a Latex Agglutination Test for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection

Infections by the basidiomycete yeast Cryptococcus neoformans are life-threatening diseases claiming more than 600,000 lives every year. The most common manifestation is cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS patients. Diagnosis primarily relies on antigen testing from serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schub, Thilo, Forster, Johannes, Suerbaum, Sebastian, Wagener, Johannes, Dichtl, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-021-02664-w
_version_ 1784577806250803200
author Schub, Thilo
Forster, Johannes
Suerbaum, Sebastian
Wagener, Johannes
Dichtl, Karl
author_facet Schub, Thilo
Forster, Johannes
Suerbaum, Sebastian
Wagener, Johannes
Dichtl, Karl
author_sort Schub, Thilo
collection PubMed
description Infections by the basidiomycete yeast Cryptococcus neoformans are life-threatening diseases claiming more than 600,000 lives every year. The most common manifestation is cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS patients. Diagnosis primarily relies on antigen testing from serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Current guidelines recommend rapid antigen testing with a focus on point-of-care assays. Over the recent years, a range of new lateral flow assays (LFAs) was launched. There is still a lack of data evaluating the CE-certified Biosynex RDT CryptoPS LFA. We compared the performance of this LFA with a latex agglutination assay (LAA; Latex-Cryptococcus Antigen Detection System, IMMY) from blood and CSF samples. Blood and/or CSF samples of 27 patients with proven cryptococcal infections caused by different species and blood–CSF pairs of 20 controls were tested applying LFA and LAA. Upon combined analysis of blood and CSF, both assays were able to identify all C. neoformans infections. Based on CSF analysis only, the LFA and the LAA had sensitivities of 100% and 93%. Neither test gave false-positive results nor was reactive in two cases of C. non-neoformans/non-gattii species infections. Both assays have high sensitivities and specificities for the diagnosis of C. neoformans infection. Contrarily to the IMMY LAA, the RDT CryptoPS LFA is suitable as a point-of-care test but is limited in the quantification of antigen reactivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00284-021-02664-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8486725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84867252021-10-04 Comparison of a Lateral Flow Assay and a Latex Agglutination Test for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection Schub, Thilo Forster, Johannes Suerbaum, Sebastian Wagener, Johannes Dichtl, Karl Curr Microbiol Article Infections by the basidiomycete yeast Cryptococcus neoformans are life-threatening diseases claiming more than 600,000 lives every year. The most common manifestation is cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS patients. Diagnosis primarily relies on antigen testing from serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Current guidelines recommend rapid antigen testing with a focus on point-of-care assays. Over the recent years, a range of new lateral flow assays (LFAs) was launched. There is still a lack of data evaluating the CE-certified Biosynex RDT CryptoPS LFA. We compared the performance of this LFA with a latex agglutination assay (LAA; Latex-Cryptococcus Antigen Detection System, IMMY) from blood and CSF samples. Blood and/or CSF samples of 27 patients with proven cryptococcal infections caused by different species and blood–CSF pairs of 20 controls were tested applying LFA and LAA. Upon combined analysis of blood and CSF, both assays were able to identify all C. neoformans infections. Based on CSF analysis only, the LFA and the LAA had sensitivities of 100% and 93%. Neither test gave false-positive results nor was reactive in two cases of C. non-neoformans/non-gattii species infections. Both assays have high sensitivities and specificities for the diagnosis of C. neoformans infection. Contrarily to the IMMY LAA, the RDT CryptoPS LFA is suitable as a point-of-care test but is limited in the quantification of antigen reactivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00284-021-02664-w. Springer US 2021-09-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8486725/ /pubmed/34581848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-021-02664-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schub, Thilo
Forster, Johannes
Suerbaum, Sebastian
Wagener, Johannes
Dichtl, Karl
Comparison of a Lateral Flow Assay and a Latex Agglutination Test for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection
title Comparison of a Lateral Flow Assay and a Latex Agglutination Test for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection
title_full Comparison of a Lateral Flow Assay and a Latex Agglutination Test for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection
title_fullStr Comparison of a Lateral Flow Assay and a Latex Agglutination Test for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a Lateral Flow Assay and a Latex Agglutination Test for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection
title_short Comparison of a Lateral Flow Assay and a Latex Agglutination Test for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection
title_sort comparison of a lateral flow assay and a latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of cryptococcus neoformans infection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-021-02664-w
work_keys_str_mv AT schubthilo comparisonofalateralflowassayandalatexagglutinationtestforthediagnosisofcryptococcusneoformansinfection
AT forsterjohannes comparisonofalateralflowassayandalatexagglutinationtestforthediagnosisofcryptococcusneoformansinfection
AT suerbaumsebastian comparisonofalateralflowassayandalatexagglutinationtestforthediagnosisofcryptococcusneoformansinfection
AT wagenerjohannes comparisonofalateralflowassayandalatexagglutinationtestforthediagnosisofcryptococcusneoformansinfection
AT dichtlkarl comparisonofalateralflowassayandalatexagglutinationtestforthediagnosisofcryptococcusneoformansinfection