Cargando…

Comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears using wooden Ayre’s spatula, VS Papcone® sampling device

This is a comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears obtained using the Papcone® sampling device or wooden Ayre’s spatula conducted from two tertiary health facilities –– Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi and Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital Awka, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Enechukwu, Chukwunonso Isaiah, Adinma, Joseph Ifeanyi Brian-D, Ikechebelu, Joseph Ifeanyichukwu, Onyiaorah, Igwebuike Victor, Onwusulu, Daniel Nnaemeka, Chiemeka, Michael Emeka, Eleje, George Uchenna, Ugboaja, Joseph Odirichukwu, Ezebialu, Ifeanyichukwu Uzoma, Ezenwa, Onochie Bruno, Nwosu, Betrand Obi, Eke, Nkemakolam Obinna, Osakwe, Chukwudi Richmond
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100860
_version_ 1784577867426824192
author Enechukwu, Chukwunonso Isaiah
Adinma, Joseph Ifeanyi Brian-D
Ikechebelu, Joseph Ifeanyichukwu
Onyiaorah, Igwebuike Victor
Onwusulu, Daniel Nnaemeka
Chiemeka, Michael Emeka
Eleje, George Uchenna
Ugboaja, Joseph Odirichukwu
Ezebialu, Ifeanyichukwu Uzoma
Ezenwa, Onochie Bruno
Nwosu, Betrand Obi
Eke, Nkemakolam Obinna
Osakwe, Chukwudi Richmond
author_facet Enechukwu, Chukwunonso Isaiah
Adinma, Joseph Ifeanyi Brian-D
Ikechebelu, Joseph Ifeanyichukwu
Onyiaorah, Igwebuike Victor
Onwusulu, Daniel Nnaemeka
Chiemeka, Michael Emeka
Eleje, George Uchenna
Ugboaja, Joseph Odirichukwu
Ezebialu, Ifeanyichukwu Uzoma
Ezenwa, Onochie Bruno
Nwosu, Betrand Obi
Eke, Nkemakolam Obinna
Osakwe, Chukwudi Richmond
author_sort Enechukwu, Chukwunonso Isaiah
collection PubMed
description This is a comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears obtained using the Papcone® sampling device or wooden Ayre’s spatula conducted from two tertiary health facilities –– Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi and Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital Awka, in Anambra State, Nigeria. Slides from smears obtained using both devices were read by a cytopathologist blinded for the study. The primary outcome was the proportion of smears with an adequate endocervical component. Significantly higher adequate cervical smears were obtained in 177/192 (92.2%) women using the Papcone® sampling device, compared to 152/192 (79.2%) using wooden Ayre’s spatula (p < 0.001). Kappa analysis showed moderate inter-rater agreement between the two devices. We recommend the use of the Papcone device when it is available, as the adequacy of cervical smears obtained with the Papcone® was better than that obtained using wooden Ayre’s spatula.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8487021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84870212021-10-07 Comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears using wooden Ayre’s spatula, VS Papcone® sampling device Enechukwu, Chukwunonso Isaiah Adinma, Joseph Ifeanyi Brian-D Ikechebelu, Joseph Ifeanyichukwu Onyiaorah, Igwebuike Victor Onwusulu, Daniel Nnaemeka Chiemeka, Michael Emeka Eleje, George Uchenna Ugboaja, Joseph Odirichukwu Ezebialu, Ifeanyichukwu Uzoma Ezenwa, Onochie Bruno Nwosu, Betrand Obi Eke, Nkemakolam Obinna Osakwe, Chukwudi Richmond Gynecol Oncol Rep Article This is a comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears obtained using the Papcone® sampling device or wooden Ayre’s spatula conducted from two tertiary health facilities –– Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi and Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital Awka, in Anambra State, Nigeria. Slides from smears obtained using both devices were read by a cytopathologist blinded for the study. The primary outcome was the proportion of smears with an adequate endocervical component. Significantly higher adequate cervical smears were obtained in 177/192 (92.2%) women using the Papcone® sampling device, compared to 152/192 (79.2%) using wooden Ayre’s spatula (p < 0.001). Kappa analysis showed moderate inter-rater agreement between the two devices. We recommend the use of the Papcone device when it is available, as the adequacy of cervical smears obtained with the Papcone® was better than that obtained using wooden Ayre’s spatula. Elsevier 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8487021/ /pubmed/34632035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100860 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Enechukwu, Chukwunonso Isaiah
Adinma, Joseph Ifeanyi Brian-D
Ikechebelu, Joseph Ifeanyichukwu
Onyiaorah, Igwebuike Victor
Onwusulu, Daniel Nnaemeka
Chiemeka, Michael Emeka
Eleje, George Uchenna
Ugboaja, Joseph Odirichukwu
Ezebialu, Ifeanyichukwu Uzoma
Ezenwa, Onochie Bruno
Nwosu, Betrand Obi
Eke, Nkemakolam Obinna
Osakwe, Chukwudi Richmond
Comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears using wooden Ayre’s spatula, VS Papcone® sampling device
title Comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears using wooden Ayre’s spatula, VS Papcone® sampling device
title_full Comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears using wooden Ayre’s spatula, VS Papcone® sampling device
title_fullStr Comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears using wooden Ayre’s spatula, VS Papcone® sampling device
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears using wooden Ayre’s spatula, VS Papcone® sampling device
title_short Comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears using wooden Ayre’s spatula, VS Papcone® sampling device
title_sort comparative study on the adequacy of cervical smears using wooden ayre’s spatula, vs papcone® sampling device
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100860
work_keys_str_mv AT enechukwuchukwunonsoisaiah comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT adinmajosephifeanyibriand comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT ikechebelujosephifeanyichukwu comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT onyiaorahigwebuikevictor comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT onwusuludanielnnaemeka comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT chiemekamichaelemeka comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT elejegeorgeuchenna comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT ugboajajosephodirichukwu comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT ezebialuifeanyichukwuuzoma comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT ezenwaonochiebruno comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT nwosubetrandobi comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT ekenkemakolamobinna comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice
AT osakwechukwudirichmond comparativestudyontheadequacyofcervicalsmearsusingwoodenayresspatulavspapconesamplingdevice