Cargando…

An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Triage, identifying patients with critical and time-sensitive disorders, is an integrated process in general emergency medicine. Obstetric triage is more specialised, requiring assessment of both woman, fetus and labour status. Failure to identify severely ill obstetric patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindroos, Linnéa, Elden, Helen, Karlsson, Ove, Sengpiel, Verena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34600512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04136-2
_version_ 1784577885537828864
author Lindroos, Linnéa
Elden, Helen
Karlsson, Ove
Sengpiel, Verena
author_facet Lindroos, Linnéa
Elden, Helen
Karlsson, Ove
Sengpiel, Verena
author_sort Lindroos, Linnéa
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Triage, identifying patients with critical and time-sensitive disorders, is an integrated process in general emergency medicine. Obstetric triage is more specialised, requiring assessment of both woman, fetus and labour status. Failure to identify severely ill obstetric patients has repeatedly led to maternal morbidity and mortality. Reliable triage systems, adapted to obstetric patients as well as local conditions, are thus essential. The study aims to assess the interrater reliability (IRR) of the Gothenburg Obstetric Triage System (GOTS). METHODS: Midwives (n = 6) and registered nurses with no experience in managing obstetric patients (n = 7), assessed 30 paper cases based on actual real-life cases, using the GOTS. Furthermore, a reference group consisting of two midwives and two obstetricians, with extensive experience in obstetric care, determined the correct triage level in order to enable analysis of over- and undertriage. IRR was assessed, both with percentage of absolute agreement and with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 388 assessments were performed, comprising all five levels of acuity in the GOTS. Absolute agreement was found in 69.6% of the assessments. The overall IRR was good, with a Kappa value of 0.78 (0.69–0.87, 95% CI) for final triage level. Comparison with reference group assessments established that over- and undertriage had occurred in 9% and 21% of the cases, respectively. The main reasons for undertriage were “not acknowledging abnormal vital sign parameters” and “limitations in study design”. CONCLUSION: The GOTS is a reliable tool for triaging obstetric patients. It enables a standardized triage process unrelated to the assessors’ level of experience in assessing and managing obstetric patients and is applicable for triaging obstetric patients presenting for emergency care at obstetric or emergency units. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04136-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8487102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84871022021-10-04 An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system Lindroos, Linnéa Elden, Helen Karlsson, Ove Sengpiel, Verena BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Triage, identifying patients with critical and time-sensitive disorders, is an integrated process in general emergency medicine. Obstetric triage is more specialised, requiring assessment of both woman, fetus and labour status. Failure to identify severely ill obstetric patients has repeatedly led to maternal morbidity and mortality. Reliable triage systems, adapted to obstetric patients as well as local conditions, are thus essential. The study aims to assess the interrater reliability (IRR) of the Gothenburg Obstetric Triage System (GOTS). METHODS: Midwives (n = 6) and registered nurses with no experience in managing obstetric patients (n = 7), assessed 30 paper cases based on actual real-life cases, using the GOTS. Furthermore, a reference group consisting of two midwives and two obstetricians, with extensive experience in obstetric care, determined the correct triage level in order to enable analysis of over- and undertriage. IRR was assessed, both with percentage of absolute agreement and with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 388 assessments were performed, comprising all five levels of acuity in the GOTS. Absolute agreement was found in 69.6% of the assessments. The overall IRR was good, with a Kappa value of 0.78 (0.69–0.87, 95% CI) for final triage level. Comparison with reference group assessments established that over- and undertriage had occurred in 9% and 21% of the cases, respectively. The main reasons for undertriage were “not acknowledging abnormal vital sign parameters” and “limitations in study design”. CONCLUSION: The GOTS is a reliable tool for triaging obstetric patients. It enables a standardized triage process unrelated to the assessors’ level of experience in assessing and managing obstetric patients and is applicable for triaging obstetric patients presenting for emergency care at obstetric or emergency units. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04136-2. BioMed Central 2021-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8487102/ /pubmed/34600512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04136-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lindroos, Linnéa
Elden, Helen
Karlsson, Ove
Sengpiel, Verena
An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system
title An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system
title_full An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system
title_fullStr An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system
title_full_unstemmed An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system
title_short An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system
title_sort interrater reliability study on the gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34600512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04136-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lindrooslinnea aninterraterreliabilitystudyonthegothenburgobstetrictriagesystemanewobstetrictriagesystem
AT eldenhelen aninterraterreliabilitystudyonthegothenburgobstetrictriagesystemanewobstetrictriagesystem
AT karlssonove aninterraterreliabilitystudyonthegothenburgobstetrictriagesystemanewobstetrictriagesystem
AT sengpielverena aninterraterreliabilitystudyonthegothenburgobstetrictriagesystemanewobstetrictriagesystem
AT lindrooslinnea interraterreliabilitystudyonthegothenburgobstetrictriagesystemanewobstetrictriagesystem
AT eldenhelen interraterreliabilitystudyonthegothenburgobstetrictriagesystemanewobstetrictriagesystem
AT karlssonove interraterreliabilitystudyonthegothenburgobstetrictriagesystemanewobstetrictriagesystem
AT sengpielverena interraterreliabilitystudyonthegothenburgobstetrictriagesystemanewobstetrictriagesystem