Cargando…
Analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study
BACKGROUND: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty(UPPP) is the most prevalent surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, but postoperative pharyngeal pain may affect patient comfort. The enhanced recovery after surgery pathway has been proved beneficial to many types of surgery but not to UPPP yet. The aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34600487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01458-8 |
_version_ | 1784577887330893824 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Fei Wang, Minxue Chen, Huixin Cheng, Nan Wang, Yanling Wu, Di Zhou, Shaoli |
author_facet | Huang, Fei Wang, Minxue Chen, Huixin Cheng, Nan Wang, Yanling Wu, Di Zhou, Shaoli |
author_sort | Huang, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty(UPPP) is the most prevalent surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, but postoperative pharyngeal pain may affect patient comfort. The enhanced recovery after surgery pathway has been proved beneficial to many types of surgery but not to UPPP yet. The aim of this pilot study was to preliminarily standrize an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for UPPP, to assess whether it has positive effects on reducing postoperative pharyngeal pain and improving patient comfort, and to test its feasibility for an international multicentre study. METHODS: This randomised controlled study analysed 116 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) who were undergoing UPPP in a single tertiary care hospital. They were randomly divided according to treatment: the ERAS group (those who received ERAS treatment) and the control group (those who received traditional treatment). Ninety-five patients completed the assessment (ERAS group, 59 patients; control group, 36 patients). Pharyngeal pain and patient comfort were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 30 min and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after UPPP. Complications, hospitalisation duration, and hospital cost were recorded. RESULTS: The VAS scores for resting pain and swallowing pain were significantly lower in the ERAS group than those in the control group at 30 min and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Patient comfort was improved in the ERAS group. The hospitalisation duration and cost were comparable between the groups. The incidence of complications showed an increasing trend in the ERAS group. CONCLUSION: The ERAS protocol significantly relieved pharyngeal pain after UPPP and improved comfort in patients with OSA, which showed the prospect for an larger study. Meanwhile a potential increase of post-operative complications in the ERAS group should be noticed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (23/09/2018, ChiCTR1800018537) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8487110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84871102021-10-04 Analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study Huang, Fei Wang, Minxue Chen, Huixin Cheng, Nan Wang, Yanling Wu, Di Zhou, Shaoli BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty(UPPP) is the most prevalent surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, but postoperative pharyngeal pain may affect patient comfort. The enhanced recovery after surgery pathway has been proved beneficial to many types of surgery but not to UPPP yet. The aim of this pilot study was to preliminarily standrize an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for UPPP, to assess whether it has positive effects on reducing postoperative pharyngeal pain and improving patient comfort, and to test its feasibility for an international multicentre study. METHODS: This randomised controlled study analysed 116 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) who were undergoing UPPP in a single tertiary care hospital. They were randomly divided according to treatment: the ERAS group (those who received ERAS treatment) and the control group (those who received traditional treatment). Ninety-five patients completed the assessment (ERAS group, 59 patients; control group, 36 patients). Pharyngeal pain and patient comfort were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 30 min and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after UPPP. Complications, hospitalisation duration, and hospital cost were recorded. RESULTS: The VAS scores for resting pain and swallowing pain were significantly lower in the ERAS group than those in the control group at 30 min and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Patient comfort was improved in the ERAS group. The hospitalisation duration and cost were comparable between the groups. The incidence of complications showed an increasing trend in the ERAS group. CONCLUSION: The ERAS protocol significantly relieved pharyngeal pain after UPPP and improved comfort in patients with OSA, which showed the prospect for an larger study. Meanwhile a potential increase of post-operative complications in the ERAS group should be noticed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (23/09/2018, ChiCTR1800018537) BioMed Central 2021-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8487110/ /pubmed/34600487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01458-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Huang, Fei Wang, Minxue Chen, Huixin Cheng, Nan Wang, Yanling Wu, Di Zhou, Shaoli Analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title | Analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_full | Analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_fullStr | Analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_short | Analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_sort | analgesia and patient comfort after enhanced recovery after surgery in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a randomised controlled pilot study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34600487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01458-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangfei analgesiaandpatientcomfortafterenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryinuvulopalatopharyngoplastyarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT wangminxue analgesiaandpatientcomfortafterenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryinuvulopalatopharyngoplastyarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT chenhuixin analgesiaandpatientcomfortafterenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryinuvulopalatopharyngoplastyarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT chengnan analgesiaandpatientcomfortafterenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryinuvulopalatopharyngoplastyarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT wangyanling analgesiaandpatientcomfortafterenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryinuvulopalatopharyngoplastyarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT wudi analgesiaandpatientcomfortafterenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryinuvulopalatopharyngoplastyarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT zhoushaoli analgesiaandpatientcomfortafterenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryinuvulopalatopharyngoplastyarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy |