Cargando…

Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DCA) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of shortening the duration of liver stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) without jeopardizing dosimetry or conformity by utilizing weight-optimized dynamic conformal arcs (WO-DCA) as opposed to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for tumors away from critical str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saglam, Yucel, Bolukbasi, Yasemin, Atasoy, Ali Ihsan, Karakose, Fatih, Budak, Mustafa, Alpan, Vildan, Topkan, Erkan, Selek, Ugur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611405
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S328375
_version_ 1784577921713700864
author Saglam, Yucel
Bolukbasi, Yasemin
Atasoy, Ali Ihsan
Karakose, Fatih
Budak, Mustafa
Alpan, Vildan
Topkan, Erkan
Selek, Ugur
author_facet Saglam, Yucel
Bolukbasi, Yasemin
Atasoy, Ali Ihsan
Karakose, Fatih
Budak, Mustafa
Alpan, Vildan
Topkan, Erkan
Selek, Ugur
author_sort Saglam, Yucel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of shortening the duration of liver stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) without jeopardizing dosimetry or conformity by utilizing weight-optimized dynamic conformal arcs (WO-DCA) as opposed to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for tumors away from critical structures. METHODS: Nineteen patients with liver metastasis were included, previously treated with 50 Gy in 4 fractions with VMAT technique using two partial coplanar arcs of 6 MV beams delivered in high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC). Two coplanar partial WO-DCA were generated on Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) for each patient; and MLC aperture around the planning target volume (PTV) was automatically generated at different margins for both arcs and maintained dynamically around the target during arc rotation. Weight of the two arcs using optimization method was adjusted between the arcs to maximize tumor coverage and protect organs at risk (OAR) based on the RTOG‐0438 protocol. RESULTS: The WO-DCA plans successfully “agreed” with the standard VMAT for OAR (liver, spinal cord, stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and heart) and PTV (D(mean), D(98%), D(2%), CI, and GI), with superior mean quality assurance (QA) pass rate (97.06 vs 93.00 for VMAT; P < 0.001 and t = 8.87). Similarly, the WO-DCA technique additionally reduced the beam‐on time (3.26 vs 4.43; P < 0.001) and monitor unit (1860 vs 2705 for VMAT; P < 0.001) values significantly. CONCLUSION: The WO‐DCA plans might minimize small‐field dosimetry errors and defeat patient‐specific VMAT QA requirements due to the omission of MLC beam modulation through the target volume. The WO‐DCA plans may additionally enable faster treatment delivery times and lower OAR without sacrificing target doses in SBRT of liver tumors away from critical structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8487279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84872792021-10-04 Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DCA) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Saglam, Yucel Bolukbasi, Yasemin Atasoy, Ali Ihsan Karakose, Fatih Budak, Mustafa Alpan, Vildan Topkan, Erkan Selek, Ugur Ther Clin Risk Manag Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of shortening the duration of liver stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) without jeopardizing dosimetry or conformity by utilizing weight-optimized dynamic conformal arcs (WO-DCA) as opposed to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for tumors away from critical structures. METHODS: Nineteen patients with liver metastasis were included, previously treated with 50 Gy in 4 fractions with VMAT technique using two partial coplanar arcs of 6 MV beams delivered in high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC). Two coplanar partial WO-DCA were generated on Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) for each patient; and MLC aperture around the planning target volume (PTV) was automatically generated at different margins for both arcs and maintained dynamically around the target during arc rotation. Weight of the two arcs using optimization method was adjusted between the arcs to maximize tumor coverage and protect organs at risk (OAR) based on the RTOG‐0438 protocol. RESULTS: The WO-DCA plans successfully “agreed” with the standard VMAT for OAR (liver, spinal cord, stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and heart) and PTV (D(mean), D(98%), D(2%), CI, and GI), with superior mean quality assurance (QA) pass rate (97.06 vs 93.00 for VMAT; P < 0.001 and t = 8.87). Similarly, the WO-DCA technique additionally reduced the beam‐on time (3.26 vs 4.43; P < 0.001) and monitor unit (1860 vs 2705 for VMAT; P < 0.001) values significantly. CONCLUSION: The WO‐DCA plans might minimize small‐field dosimetry errors and defeat patient‐specific VMAT QA requirements due to the omission of MLC beam modulation through the target volume. The WO‐DCA plans may additionally enable faster treatment delivery times and lower OAR without sacrificing target doses in SBRT of liver tumors away from critical structures. Dove 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8487279/ /pubmed/34611405 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S328375 Text en © 2021 Saglam et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Saglam, Yucel
Bolukbasi, Yasemin
Atasoy, Ali Ihsan
Karakose, Fatih
Budak, Mustafa
Alpan, Vildan
Topkan, Erkan
Selek, Ugur
Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DCA) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
title Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DCA) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
title_full Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DCA) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
title_fullStr Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DCA) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
title_full_unstemmed Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DCA) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
title_short Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DCA) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
title_sort novel clinically weight-optimized dynamic conformal arcs (wo-dca) for liver sbrt: a comparison with volumetric modulated arc therapy (vmat)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611405
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S328375
work_keys_str_mv AT saglamyucel novelclinicallyweightoptimizeddynamicconformalarcswodcaforliversbrtacomparisonwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat
AT bolukbasiyasemin novelclinicallyweightoptimizeddynamicconformalarcswodcaforliversbrtacomparisonwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat
AT atasoyaliihsan novelclinicallyweightoptimizeddynamicconformalarcswodcaforliversbrtacomparisonwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat
AT karakosefatih novelclinicallyweightoptimizeddynamicconformalarcswodcaforliversbrtacomparisonwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat
AT budakmustafa novelclinicallyweightoptimizeddynamicconformalarcswodcaforliversbrtacomparisonwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat
AT alpanvildan novelclinicallyweightoptimizeddynamicconformalarcswodcaforliversbrtacomparisonwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat
AT topkanerkan novelclinicallyweightoptimizeddynamicconformalarcswodcaforliversbrtacomparisonwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat
AT selekugur novelclinicallyweightoptimizeddynamicconformalarcswodcaforliversbrtacomparisonwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat