Cargando…

A 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique

BACKGROUND: To compare the functional and anatomic outcomes at 24 months of eyes with a primary macular hole that failed to close after a prior surgery and were treated with either an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane (AT-ILM) or the retina expansion (RE) technique. METHODS: R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alezzandrini, Arturo, Dorrego, Camila I., Cibrán, María Victoria, Cortina-Revelli, Valentina, Rocco, Franco D., Zas, Marcelo, Wu, Lihteh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34600572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00329-1
_version_ 1784577978559102976
author Alezzandrini, Arturo
Dorrego, Camila I.
Cibrán, María Victoria
Cortina-Revelli, Valentina
Rocco, Franco D.
Zas, Marcelo
Wu, Lihteh
author_facet Alezzandrini, Arturo
Dorrego, Camila I.
Cibrán, María Victoria
Cortina-Revelli, Valentina
Rocco, Franco D.
Zas, Marcelo
Wu, Lihteh
author_sort Alezzandrini, Arturo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the functional and anatomic outcomes at 24 months of eyes with a primary macular hole that failed to close after a prior surgery and were treated with either an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane (AT-ILM) or the retina expansion (RE) technique. METHODS: Retrospective, single center, comparative study of 28 eyes with a macular hole that failed to close after a prior vitrectomy. All eyes had a size of ≥ 500 μm. Participants were divided into two groups according to the type of intervention performed: AT-ILM group (n = 14) and RE group (n = 14). Main outcomes measured were the MH closure rate assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Patients in the AT-ILM group experienced a statistically significantly improved post-operative BCVA (median 49.50 letters, range 20–66 letters) over the pre-operative BCVA (median 39 letters, range 18–52 letters) (p-value = 0.006 Wilcoxon paired sample test). In contrast, patients in the RE group did not achieve a statistically significant improvement (p-value = 0.328, Wilcoxon paired sample test). The median pre-operative BCVA was 35 letters (range 18–52 letters), whereas the median post-operative BCVA was 39 letters (range 16–66 letters). At 24 months of follow-up, 85.7% of patients in the AT-ILM group achieved closure compared to 57.1% in the RE group (p-value = 0.209, Fisher’s exact test). Multivariate analysis showed that MH size and baseline BCVA were important determinants of post-operative BCVA. The baseline MH size was the only significant pre-operative factor that influenced MH closure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates similar closure rates for both groups however better visual outcomes were obtained with the AT-ILM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40942-021-00329-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8487545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84875452021-10-04 A 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique Alezzandrini, Arturo Dorrego, Camila I. Cibrán, María Victoria Cortina-Revelli, Valentina Rocco, Franco D. Zas, Marcelo Wu, Lihteh Int J Retina Vitreous Original Article BACKGROUND: To compare the functional and anatomic outcomes at 24 months of eyes with a primary macular hole that failed to close after a prior surgery and were treated with either an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane (AT-ILM) or the retina expansion (RE) technique. METHODS: Retrospective, single center, comparative study of 28 eyes with a macular hole that failed to close after a prior vitrectomy. All eyes had a size of ≥ 500 μm. Participants were divided into two groups according to the type of intervention performed: AT-ILM group (n = 14) and RE group (n = 14). Main outcomes measured were the MH closure rate assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Patients in the AT-ILM group experienced a statistically significantly improved post-operative BCVA (median 49.50 letters, range 20–66 letters) over the pre-operative BCVA (median 39 letters, range 18–52 letters) (p-value = 0.006 Wilcoxon paired sample test). In contrast, patients in the RE group did not achieve a statistically significant improvement (p-value = 0.328, Wilcoxon paired sample test). The median pre-operative BCVA was 35 letters (range 18–52 letters), whereas the median post-operative BCVA was 39 letters (range 16–66 letters). At 24 months of follow-up, 85.7% of patients in the AT-ILM group achieved closure compared to 57.1% in the RE group (p-value = 0.209, Fisher’s exact test). Multivariate analysis showed that MH size and baseline BCVA were important determinants of post-operative BCVA. The baseline MH size was the only significant pre-operative factor that influenced MH closure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates similar closure rates for both groups however better visual outcomes were obtained with the AT-ILM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40942-021-00329-1. BioMed Central 2021-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8487545/ /pubmed/34600572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00329-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alezzandrini, Arturo
Dorrego, Camila I.
Cibrán, María Victoria
Cortina-Revelli, Valentina
Rocco, Franco D.
Zas, Marcelo
Wu, Lihteh
A 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique
title A 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique
title_full A 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique
title_fullStr A 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique
title_full_unstemmed A 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique
title_short A 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique
title_sort 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34600572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00329-1
work_keys_str_mv AT alezzandriniarturo a24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT dorregocamilai a24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT cibranmariavictoria a24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT cortinarevellivalentina a24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT roccofrancod a24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT zasmarcelo a24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT wulihteh a24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT alezzandriniarturo 24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT dorregocamilai 24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT cibranmariavictoria 24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT cortinarevellivalentina 24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT roccofrancod 24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT zasmarcelo 24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique
AT wulihteh 24monthfollowupofrefractorymacularholestreatedwithanautologoustransplantationofinternallimitingmembraneversusretinaexpansiontechnique