Cargando…

The voices of lived experience: reflections from citizen team members in a long-term care research program

BACKGROUND: The Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program is a partnered health services research team that aims to improve the quality of care and quality of life for residents and quality of worklife for staff in nursing homes. The TREC team undertook several activities to enhance the coll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mann, Jim, Bishop, Roberta, Bond, Graham, Forbes, Faye, Kieloch, Barbara, Thelker, Christine, Chamberlain, Stephanie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34600593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00312-y
_version_ 1784577982489165824
author Mann, Jim
Bishop, Roberta
Bond, Graham
Forbes, Faye
Kieloch, Barbara
Thelker, Christine
Chamberlain, Stephanie A.
author_facet Mann, Jim
Bishop, Roberta
Bond, Graham
Forbes, Faye
Kieloch, Barbara
Thelker, Christine
Chamberlain, Stephanie A.
author_sort Mann, Jim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program is a partnered health services research team that aims to improve the quality of care and quality of life for residents and quality of worklife for staff in nursing homes. The TREC team undertook several activities to enhance the collaboration between the academic researchers and us, the citizen members. Known as VOICES (Voice Of (potential) Incoming residents, Caregivers Educating uS) we aim to share our experience working with a large research team. METHODS: We reflect on the findings reported in the paper by Chamberlain et al. (2021). They described the findings from two surveys (May 2018, July 2019) that were completed by TREC team members (researchers, trainees, staff, decision-makers, citizens). The survey questions asked about the respondents’ experience with citizen engagement, their perceptions of the benefits and challenges of citizen engagement, and their unmet needs for training. RESULTS: The paper reported on the survey findings from all the survey respondents (research team, decision-makers, citizens), but much of the results focused on the researcher perspective. They reported that respondents believed that citizen engagement was a benefit to their research but noted many challenges. While we appreciate the researchers’ positive perceptions of citizen engagement, much work remains to fully integrate us into all stages of the research. We offer our reflections and suggestions for how to work with citizen members and identify areas for more training and support. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased interest in citizen engagement, we feel there is a lack of understanding and support to truly integrate non-academic team members on research teams. We hope the discussion in this commentary identifies specific areas that need to be addressed to support the continued engagement of citizens and show how the lived experience can bring value to research teams.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8487564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84875642021-10-04 The voices of lived experience: reflections from citizen team members in a long-term care research program Mann, Jim Bishop, Roberta Bond, Graham Forbes, Faye Kieloch, Barbara Thelker, Christine Chamberlain, Stephanie A. Res Involv Engagem Commentary BACKGROUND: The Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program is a partnered health services research team that aims to improve the quality of care and quality of life for residents and quality of worklife for staff in nursing homes. The TREC team undertook several activities to enhance the collaboration between the academic researchers and us, the citizen members. Known as VOICES (Voice Of (potential) Incoming residents, Caregivers Educating uS) we aim to share our experience working with a large research team. METHODS: We reflect on the findings reported in the paper by Chamberlain et al. (2021). They described the findings from two surveys (May 2018, July 2019) that were completed by TREC team members (researchers, trainees, staff, decision-makers, citizens). The survey questions asked about the respondents’ experience with citizen engagement, their perceptions of the benefits and challenges of citizen engagement, and their unmet needs for training. RESULTS: The paper reported on the survey findings from all the survey respondents (research team, decision-makers, citizens), but much of the results focused on the researcher perspective. They reported that respondents believed that citizen engagement was a benefit to their research but noted many challenges. While we appreciate the researchers’ positive perceptions of citizen engagement, much work remains to fully integrate us into all stages of the research. We offer our reflections and suggestions for how to work with citizen members and identify areas for more training and support. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased interest in citizen engagement, we feel there is a lack of understanding and support to truly integrate non-academic team members on research teams. We hope the discussion in this commentary identifies specific areas that need to be addressed to support the continued engagement of citizens and show how the lived experience can bring value to research teams. BioMed Central 2021-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8487564/ /pubmed/34600593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00312-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Mann, Jim
Bishop, Roberta
Bond, Graham
Forbes, Faye
Kieloch, Barbara
Thelker, Christine
Chamberlain, Stephanie A.
The voices of lived experience: reflections from citizen team members in a long-term care research program
title The voices of lived experience: reflections from citizen team members in a long-term care research program
title_full The voices of lived experience: reflections from citizen team members in a long-term care research program
title_fullStr The voices of lived experience: reflections from citizen team members in a long-term care research program
title_full_unstemmed The voices of lived experience: reflections from citizen team members in a long-term care research program
title_short The voices of lived experience: reflections from citizen team members in a long-term care research program
title_sort voices of lived experience: reflections from citizen team members in a long-term care research program
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34600593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00312-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mannjim thevoicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT bishoproberta thevoicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT bondgraham thevoicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT forbesfaye thevoicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT kielochbarbara thevoicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT thelkerchristine thevoicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT chamberlainstephaniea thevoicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT mannjim voicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT bishoproberta voicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT bondgraham voicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT forbesfaye voicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT kielochbarbara voicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT thelkerchristine voicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram
AT chamberlainstephaniea voicesoflivedexperiencereflectionsfromcitizenteammembersinalongtermcareresearchprogram