Cargando…

Gastric Cancer Risk of Intestinal Metaplasia Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is an independent risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). However, the subtypes of IM as a risk factor for GC remain controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between IM subtypes and GC risk. METHODS: Systematic searches we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Sijing, Yang, Yang, Fang, Shuangshuang, Guo, Song, Xu, Chuchu, Zhang, Ping, Wei, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34597278
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000402
_version_ 1784578022176718848
author Du, Sijing
Yang, Yang
Fang, Shuangshuang
Guo, Song
Xu, Chuchu
Zhang, Ping
Wei, Wei
author_facet Du, Sijing
Yang, Yang
Fang, Shuangshuang
Guo, Song
Xu, Chuchu
Zhang, Ping
Wei, Wei
author_sort Du, Sijing
collection PubMed
description Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is an independent risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). However, the subtypes of IM as a risk factor for GC remain controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between IM subtypes and GC risk. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for published cohort studies of patients with complete IM (type I) or incomplete IM (type II or type III) from inception to May 15, 2021. We extracted relevant data and calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the GC risk with IM subtypes. RESULTS: Twelve cohort studies comprising 6,498 individuals were included in the study. Compared with complete IM, the pooled relative risk of GC risk of patients with incomplete IM was 5.16 (95% CI, 3.28–8.12), and the GC risk of type III IM was the highest, with a pooled relative risk of 2.88 (95% CI, 1.37–6.04) compared with that of type II. Compared with complete IM, the pooled relative risk of dysplasia risk in patients with incomplete IM was 3.72 (95% CI, 1.42–9.72), and the dysplasia risk of type III IM was 11.73 (95% CI, 2.08–66.08) compared with that of type I. DISCUSSION: Patients with incomplete IM, especially type III, were at a higher risk of GC and dysplasia than those with complete IM. The current evidence indicates a potential correlation between IM subtypes and GC risk, which may support the use of IM subtypes in GC surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8487777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84877772021-10-04 Gastric Cancer Risk of Intestinal Metaplasia Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies Du, Sijing Yang, Yang Fang, Shuangshuang Guo, Song Xu, Chuchu Zhang, Ping Wei, Wei Clin Transl Gastroenterol Review Article Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is an independent risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). However, the subtypes of IM as a risk factor for GC remain controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between IM subtypes and GC risk. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for published cohort studies of patients with complete IM (type I) or incomplete IM (type II or type III) from inception to May 15, 2021. We extracted relevant data and calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the GC risk with IM subtypes. RESULTS: Twelve cohort studies comprising 6,498 individuals were included in the study. Compared with complete IM, the pooled relative risk of GC risk of patients with incomplete IM was 5.16 (95% CI, 3.28–8.12), and the GC risk of type III IM was the highest, with a pooled relative risk of 2.88 (95% CI, 1.37–6.04) compared with that of type II. Compared with complete IM, the pooled relative risk of dysplasia risk in patients with incomplete IM was 3.72 (95% CI, 1.42–9.72), and the dysplasia risk of type III IM was 11.73 (95% CI, 2.08–66.08) compared with that of type I. DISCUSSION: Patients with incomplete IM, especially type III, were at a higher risk of GC and dysplasia than those with complete IM. The current evidence indicates a potential correlation between IM subtypes and GC risk, which may support the use of IM subtypes in GC surveillance. Wolters Kluwer 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8487777/ /pubmed/34597278 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000402 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Review Article
Du, Sijing
Yang, Yang
Fang, Shuangshuang
Guo, Song
Xu, Chuchu
Zhang, Ping
Wei, Wei
Gastric Cancer Risk of Intestinal Metaplasia Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title Gastric Cancer Risk of Intestinal Metaplasia Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_full Gastric Cancer Risk of Intestinal Metaplasia Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_fullStr Gastric Cancer Risk of Intestinal Metaplasia Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_full_unstemmed Gastric Cancer Risk of Intestinal Metaplasia Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_short Gastric Cancer Risk of Intestinal Metaplasia Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_sort gastric cancer risk of intestinal metaplasia subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34597278
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000402
work_keys_str_mv AT dusijing gastriccancerriskofintestinalmetaplasiasubtypesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT yangyang gastriccancerriskofintestinalmetaplasiasubtypesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT fangshuangshuang gastriccancerriskofintestinalmetaplasiasubtypesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT guosong gastriccancerriskofintestinalmetaplasiasubtypesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT xuchuchu gastriccancerriskofintestinalmetaplasiasubtypesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT zhangping gastriccancerriskofintestinalmetaplasiasubtypesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT weiwei gastriccancerriskofintestinalmetaplasiasubtypesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies